Automated Tissue Analysis – a Bioinformatics Perspective

Summary

Objectives: Recent progress in automated tissue analysis (tissomics) provides reproducible phenotypical characterization of histological specimens. We introduce informatics tools to cluster and correlate quantitative tissue profiles with gene expression data. The great potential of synergies between tissue analysis and bioinformatics and its perspectives in medical research and computational diagnostics are discussed.

Methods: Key enablers in microscopic imaging and machine vision are reviewed to perform a high-throughput tissue analysis. Methodologies are described and results are demonstrated that support a combined analysis of tissue with gene expression profiles whereby the consideration of individual responses is key.

Results: Comprehensive histomorphometric profiles, extracted using machine vision, provide information regarding the components and heterogeneity of a tissue in a reproducible format amenable to data mining and analysis. Tissue quantitative information can be placed in synergetic context with bioinformatics data, such as gene expression profiles, for a more comprehensive stratification of individual responses. From a bioinformatics point of view tissue data are co-variants that support the identification of candidate genes relevant in tissue injury or disease.

Conclusions: Progress in automated analytics enables the generation of quantitative data about tissue previously limited to visual histopathology. Such reproducible data sets can be statistically correlated and clustered throughout the continuum of bioinformatics. The combined approach supports a system-wide view of biology and has a potential to accelerate developments for a personalized computational diagnosis.

Keywords

Digital tissue imaging - phenotyping - tissomics - multi-sample comparison - computational diagnosis - biomedical informatics - systems biology

• References

• 1 Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein O. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. PNAS 1998; 95: 14863-8.
• 2 Thomas JG, Olson JM, Tapscott SJ, Zhao LP. An efficient and robust statistical modeling approach to analyze genome-wide expression profiles: discovery of differentially expressed genes in human cancers. Genome Research 2001; 11: 1227-36.
• 3 Hedenfalk et al. Gene expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. The New Journal of Medicine 2001; 344 (08) 539-48.
• 4 Granzow M, Barrar D, Dubitzky W, Schuster A, Azuaje F, Eils R. Tumor classification by gene expression profiling: comparison and validation of five clustering methods. SIGBIO Newsletters on Biomedical Computing of the ACM 2001; 2 (01) 16-22.
• 5 Pusztai L, Ayers M, Stec J Hortobagyi. Clinical applications of cDNA microarrays in oncology. The Oncologist 2003; 8: 252-8.
• 6 Mansfield E. Genetic testing and personalized medicine – an FDA view. Preclinica 2003; 1 (04) 155-8.
• 7 Kohane S. Bioinformatics and clinical informatics: the imparative to collaborate. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7 (05) 512-6.
• 8 Kanade T. Region segmentation, signal vs semantics. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 1980; 13: 279-97.
• 9 Kanal N. Automatic pattern recognition. In Pattern recognition and image processing in physics. Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK: Nato Adv Studies; 1990: 55-79.
• 10 Kriete A, Schaffer R, Harms H, Aus HM. Computer- based cytophotometric classification of thyroid tumors in imprints. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1985; 109 (03) 252-6.
• 11 Kriete A, Romen W, Schaffer R, Harms H, Haucke M, Gerlach B, Aus HM, ter Meulen V. Computer analysis of chromatin arrangement and nuclear texture in follicular thyroid tumours. Histochemistry 1983; 78 (02) 227-30.
• 12 Kriete A, Anderson M, Love B, Caffrey J, Young B, Sendera T, Magnuson S, Braughler M. Combined histomorphometric and gene expression profiling applied to toxicology. Genome Biology 2003; 4: R32.
• 13 Kriete A, Boyce K. Advanced tissue analysis using a combined histo-morphometric and gene expression profiling method. In Advanced biomedical and clinical diagnostic systems. Vo-Dinh, Grundfest, Benaron, Cohn (eds). SPIE/BIOS Conf Proc 2003; 4958: 137-43.
• 14 Collins FS. et al. Variations on a theme: Cataloging human DNA sequence variation. Science 1997; 278: 1580-1.
• 15 MacBeath G. Protein microarrays and proteomics. Nature Genetics 2002; 32: 526-32.
• 16 Glasbrook N, Beecher C, Ryals J. Metabolic profiling on the right path. Nature Biotech 2000; 18: 1142-3.
• 17 Vector Expression User’s Manual, Informax Inc. 2003
• 18 Quackenbush J. Computational analysis of microarray data. Nature Reviews Genetics 2001; 2: 418-27.
• 19 Sultan M, Wigle DA, Cumbaa CA, Maziarz M, Glasgow J, Tsao MS, Jurisica I. Binary tree-structured vector quantization approach to clustering and visualizing microarray data. Bioinformatics 2002; 18 (Suppl. 01) Suppl S111-S119.
• 20 Boll M, Weber LW, Becker E, Stampfl A. Hepatocyte damage induced by carbon tetrachloride: inhibited lipoprotein secretion and changed lipoprotein composition. Z Naturforsch [C] 2001; 56 3-4 283-90.
• 21 The NCBI handbook [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information 2002; Oct. Chapter 17, The Reference Sequence (RefSeq) Project.
• 22 Verhoeven NM, Huck JH, Roos B, Struys EA, Salomons GS, Douwes AC, van der Knaap MS, Jakobs C. Transaldolase deficiency: liver cirrhosis associated with a new inborn error in the pentose phosphate pathway. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68 (05) 1086-92.
• 23 Bechic MJ. The role of the pathologist as a tissue refiner and data miner: the impact of functional genomics on the modern pathology laboratory and the critical roles of pathology informatics and bioinformatics. Molecular Diagnosis 2001; 5 (04) 287-99.
• 24 Hamadeh HK, Knight BL, Haugen AC, Sieber S, Amin RP, Bushel PB, Stoll R, Blanchard K, Jayadev S, Tennant R, Cunningham M, Afshari C, Paules S. Methapyrilene Toxicity: Anchorage of pathologic observations to gene expression alterations. Toxicol Pathology 2002; 30 (04) 470-82.
• 25 Best CJ, Emmert-Buck MR. Molecular profiling of tissue samples using laser capture microdissection. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2001; 1: 53-60.
• 26 Nadkarni PM. The challenges of recording phenotype in a generalizable and computable form. The Pharmacogenomics Journal 2003; 3: 8-10.