Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2002; 41(04): 229-304
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634491
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

Requirements Engineering for Inter-Organizational Health Information Systems with Functions for Spatial Analyses: Modeling a WHO Safe Community Applying Use Case Maps

C. Ölvingson
1   Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
,
N. Hallberg
1   Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
2   Swedish Defense Research Agency, Linköping, Sweden
,
T. Timpka
1   Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
3   Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
,
K. Lindqvist
1   Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
3   Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 06 September 2001

Accepted 04 February 2002

Publication Date:
07 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To evaluate Use Case Maps (UCMs) as a technique for Requirements Engineering (RE) in the development of information systems with functions for spatial analyses in inter-organizational public health settings.

Methods: In this study, Participatory Action Research (PAR) is used to explore the UCM notation for requirements elicitation and to gather the opinions of the users. The Delphi technique is used to reach consensus in the construction of UCMs.

Results: The results show that UCMs can provide a visualization of the system‘s functionality and in combination with PAR provide a sound basis for gathering requirements in inter-organizational settings. UCMs were found to represent a suitable level for describing the organization and the dynamic flux of information including spatial resolution to all stakeholders. Moreover, by using PAR, the voices of the users and their tacit knowledge is intercepted. Further, UCMs are found useful in generating intuitive requirements by the creation of use cases.

Conclusions: With UCMs and PAR it is possible to study the effects of design changes in the general information display and the spatial resolution in the same context. Both requirements on the information system in general and the functions for spatial analyses are possible to elicit when identifying the different responsibilities and the demands on spatial resolution associated to the actions of each administrative unit. However, the development process of UCM is not well documented and needs further investigation and formulation of guidelines.

Keywords

Health informatics - public health - system development - requirements engineering (RE) - case study methods
 

  • References

  • 1 De Lepper MJC, Scholten HJ, Stern RM. (eds). The Added Value of Geographical Information Systems in Public and Environmental Health. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Gatrell A, Löytönen M. GIS and Health. London: Taylor & Francis; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Siddiqi J, Shekaran MC. Requirements Engineering: The Emerging Wisdom. IEEE Software 1996; 13: 15-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Suchman LA. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge, UK: University Press; 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Leonard D, Rayport JF. Spark Innovation Through Empathic Design. Harvard Business Review. 1997: 102-13.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hallberg N. Incorporating User Values in the Design of Information Systems and Services in the Public Sector. A Methods Approach. [Dissertation No. 596]. Linköping University; Linköping, Sweden: 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Buhr RJA. Use Case Maps as Architectural Entities for Complex Systems. Transactions on Software Engineering IEEE 1998; 24 (Suppl. 12) 1131-55.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Andrade RMC. Applying Use Case Maps and Formal Methods to the Development of Wireless Mobile ATM Networks. Lfm2000:The Fifth NASA Langley Formal Methods Workshop, Willamsburg, Virginia, USA: June, 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Regnell B, Runeson P, Wohlin C. Towards Integration of Use Case Modelling and Usage-based Testing. J Systems Software 2000; 50: 117-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jacobsen I, Christerson M, Jonsson P, Övergaard G. Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Wokingham: ACM Press: Addison-Wesley; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Kulak D, Guiney E. Use Cases: Requirements in Context. New York: ACM Press: Addison-Wesley; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Buhr RJA, Casselman RS. Use Case Maps for Object-Oriented Systems. Prentice Hall; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Buhr RJA. (1996 a). Use Case Maps for Attributing Behaviour to System Architecture. Fourth International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Real Time Systems (WPDRTS), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: April 15-16, 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Amyot D, Logrippo L. Use Case Maps and LOTOS for the Prototyping and Validation of a Mobile Group Call System. Computer Communications 2000; 23: 1135-57.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Amyot D. Use Case Maps Quick Tutorial Version 1.0. www.usecasemaps.org 1999 Acc. 204491-11-03.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 World Health Organization. Handle Life With Care. Information Kit (World Health Day 7 April 1993) WHO: Geneva; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Lindqvist K, Timpka T, Schelp L. Ten Years of Experience from a Participatory Community-based Injury Prevention Program in Motala, Sweden. Public Health 1996; 110: 339-46.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Karlsen JI. Action Research as Method: Reflections from a Program for Developing Methods and Competence. In: Whyte WF. (ed.). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Argyris C, Schön DA. Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared: A Commentary. In: Whyte WF. (ed.). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Whyte WF, Greenwood DJ, Lazes P. Participatory Action Research: Through Practice to Science in Social Research. In: Whyte WF. (ed.). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Elden M, Levin M. Cogenerative Learning: Bringing Participation into Action Research. In: Whyte WF. (ed.). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Jones J, Hunter D. Qualitative Research: Consensus Methods for Medical and Health Services Research. BMJ 1995; 311: 376-80.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Stewart J, O’Halloran C, Harrigan P. et al. Identifying Appropriate Tasks for the Preregistration Year: Modified Delphi Technique. BMJ 1999; 319: 224-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kvale S. Interviews: an Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 25 National Academy of Sciences. Networking Health: prescriptions for the Internet. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Buhr RJA. Understanding Large-scale Behaviour Patterns in Complex Systems. Proceedings Second IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems. 1996: 143-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Onsrud HJ, Pinto JK. Diffusion of Geographic Information Innovations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1991; 5 (Suppl. 04) 447-67.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Walton RE, Gaffney ME. Research, Action, and Participation: The Merchant Shipping Case. In: Whyte WF. (ed.). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Amyot D, Mussbacher G. On the Extension of UML with Use Case Maps Concepts. The 3rd International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (<<UML2000>>). York, UK: October 2000
    Google Scholar