Methods Inf Med 1990; 29(01): 30-40
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634764
Knowledge-based systems
Schattauer GmbH

Proposed Methodology for Knowledge Acquisition: A Study on Congenital Heart Disease Diagnosis

F. B. Leãot
1   Institute de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
,
F. A. Rocha
2   Centro de Informática em Saúde da Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
The authors express their gratitude to Prof. M. L. Leāo for the revision of the English text, as well as to Ms. Helena Rossi for the proper organization of the bibliography.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

Abstract

“Knowledge and human power are synonymous, since the ignorance of the cause frustrates the effect:…“

Francis Bacon1

This paper proposes a methodology for knowledge acquisition (KA) from multiple experts, in an attempt to elicit the heuristic rules followed by the physician in diagnosing twelve frequently occurring congenital heart diseases (CHD). Twenty-two pediatric cardiologists and twenty-three general cardiologists were interviewed with this technique; 274 interviews were conducted, 169 with the 22 experts, 105 with the 23 non-experts. A graph formalism was employed to represent their reasoning model, leading to the construction of a “mean reasoning model” for each diagnosis, separately for experts and non-experts. The results indicate that experts, compared to non-experts, tend to build knowledge representation models (KRM) that are smaller and less complex. Qualitative differences in information utilization between the two groups were also observed. Entropy analysis suggests a greater objectivity and cohesion of the experts’ model.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Barr A, Cohen P R, Feigenbaum E A. Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (Vols 1-3). Los Altos Calif: Kaufmann; 1981/82.
  • 2 Buchanan B G, Shortliffe E H. The context of the Mycin experiments. In: Rule- Based. Expert Systems. The Mycin Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publ Comp; 1985: 3-19.
  • 3 Clancey W J. The epistemology of a rule- based expert system - a framework for explanation. Art Intell 1983; 20: 215-51.
  • 4 Duda R O, Shortliffe E H. Expert systems research. Science 1983; 220: 261-8.
  • 5 Hayes-Roth F, Waterman D A, Lenat B D. An overview of expert systems. In: Building Expert Systems. Hayes-Roth F, Watermann D A, Lenat B D. Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley Publ Comp; 1983: 3-30.
  • 6 Kingsland L C, Lindberg DAB, Sharp G C. Anatomy of a knowledge-based consultant system: AI/Rheum.M. D.. Computing 1986; 03: 18-26.
  • 7 Miller R, Masarie F, Myers J D. Quick Medical Reference (QMR) for diagnostic assistance. M. D.. Computing 1986; 03: 34-48.
  • 8 Miller R, Pople H, Myers J. INTERNIST- 1 an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 468-76.
  • 9 Nilsson N J. Principles of artificial intelligence. Palo Alto Calif: Tioga; 1980
  • 10 Shortliffe E H, Buchanan B G, Feigenbaum E A. Knowledge engineering for medical decison making: a review of computer-based clinical decision aids. Proc IEEE 1979; 67: 1207-24.
  • 11 Anderson H. Why artificial intelligence isn’t (yet). AI Expert 1987; 02: 36-44.
  • 12 Canning R C. What’s happening with expert systems?. EDP ANALYZER 1985; 23: 1-15.
  • 13 Friedman R B, Gustafson D H. Computers in clinical medicine: a critical review (editorial). Comp Biomed Res 1977; 10: 199-204.
  • 14 Kinney E L. Medical expert systems - who needs them?. (editorial) CHEST 1987; 91: 3-4.
  • 15 Reggia J A, Tuhrim S. An overview of methods for computer-assisted medical decision making. In: Computer-Assisted Medical Decision Making. Reggia J A, Tuhrim S. eds. New York: Springer Verlag; 1985: 45.
  • 16 Sandell H S H, Bourne J R. Expert system in medicine: a Biomedical Engineering perspective. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1985; 12: 95-129.
  • 17 Schwartz W B, Patil R S, Szolovits P. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Where do we stand?. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 685-8.
  • 18 De Greef P, Breuker J. A case study in structured knowledge acquisition. In: Proceedings of UCAI-9. Los Angeles: 1985
  • 19 Ericsson K A, Simon H A. Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev 1980; 87: 215-51.
  • 20 Finin T W. Interactive classification; a technique for acquiring and maintaining knowledge bases. In: Proc IEEE: 1986: 914-21.
  • 21 Goncalves CA. Aquisicāo e representaçāo de conhecimento para sistemas especialis- tas (Doctoral thesis). FEA/USP. 1986
  • 22 Grover M D. A pragmatic knowledge acquisition methodology. Proceedings of IJCAI-8, Karlsruhe. In: 1983
  • 23 Haley P, Williams C. Expert system development requires knowledge engineering. Comput Design 1986; 25: 83-8.
  • 24 Hoffman R R. The problem of extracting the knowledge of experts from the perspective of experimental psychology. AI Magazine 1987; 08: 53-67.
  • 25 Johnson P E. What kind of expert should a system be?. J Med Philos 1983; 08: 11-91.
  • 26 Kassirer J P, Kuipers B J, Gorry G A. Towards a therory of clinical expertise. Am J Med 1982; 73: 251-9.
  • 27 Kolodner J L. Towards an understanding of the role of experience in the evolution from novice to expert. Int J Man-Machine Stud 1983; 19: 497-518.
  • 28 Kolodner J, Kolodner R M. Using experience in clinical problem solving: introduction and framework. IEEE Trans Syst Man C. ybcrn 1987; SCM-17: 420-31.
  • 29 Kulikowsky C A. Problems in the design of knowledge bases for medical consultation. In: Computer-Assisted Medical Decision Making. Reggia A J, Tuhrim S. eds. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1985: 38-48.
  • 30 Larkin J, McDermott J, Simon D P, Simon H A. Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science 1980; 208: 1335-42.
  • 31 Leão B. Construcāo da base de conhecimento de um sistema especialista de apoio ao diagnóstico das cardiopatias congênitas (Ph D Thesis). Sāo Paulo: Escola Paulista de Medicina; 1988
  • 32 Leāo B F, Lucchese F A, Rocha A F. A methodology proposal of knowledge acquisition. In: Proc Seventh Intern Congr Med Inform Europe, Rome 1987; 1042-50.
  • 33 Leāo B F, Rocha A F. Medical knowledge representation - a case study. Second IFSA Congress, Tokyo 1987; 376-9.
  • 34 Michaelsen R H, Michie D, Boulanger A. The technology of expert systems - transplanting expert knowledge to machines. Byte 1985; 10: 303-12.
  • 35 Mittal S. Knowledge acquisition from multiple experts. AI Magazine 1985; 06: 32-6.
  • 36 Prerau D S. Knowledge acquisition in the development of a large expert system. AI Magazine 1987; 08: 43-51.
  • 37 Shachter R, Heckerman D E. Thinking backward for knowledge acquisition. AI Magazine 1987; 07: 55-61.
  • 38 Van Bemmel J H. Formalization of medical knowledge. Meth Inform Med 1986; 25: 191-3.
  • 39 Van Bemmel J H. Formalization of medical knowledge, the basis for diagnostic strategies and expert systems. In: Van Bemmel G J, Grémy F, Zvarova J. eds. Medical Decision Making: Diagnostic Strategies and Expert Systems.. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ Comp; 1985: 1-11.
  • 40 Wielinga B J, Breuker J A. Interpretation of verbal data for knowledge acquisition. In: O’Seha T. Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ Comp; 1985: 3-12.
  • 41 Wright G, Ayton P. Eliciting and modelling expert knowledge. Dec Supp Syst 1987; 03: 13-26.
  • 42 Kassirer J P, Gorry G A. Clinical problem solving: a behavioral analysis. Ann Intern Med 1978; 89: 245-55.
  • 43 Roch A F. Toward a theoretical and experimental approach of fuzzy learning. In: Gupta M M, Sanchez E. eds. Approximate Reasoning in Decision Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ Comp; 1982: 191-9.
  • 44 Haray F. Graph Theory. Reading mass: Addison-Wesley Publ Comp; 19872: 8-40.