RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634773
Development of a Computer-Aided Reference System for Differential Diagnostics Support
The authors wish to thank C. Lageman, who helped us a great deal in creating the knowledge base, A. Sager and D. Hollander for programming the user interface, and B. Graubner (Department of Medical Informatics) for many critical discussions. We would like to acknowledge the contribution of T. Naue in initially creating the PROLOG system and his ongoing efforts in evaluating the developed system.
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
06. Februar 2018 (online)
Abstract
In a situation of uncertain diagnosis, physicians may spend valuable time consulting relevant literature, often with unsatisfactory results. Therefore, our aim was to develop a computer system which supports differential diagnostics via rapid and comprehensive searches through information in literature. Based on entered signs and symptoms our prototype is able to offer probable diagnoses. Subsequently, further examinations and tests are suggested to confirm or exclude a certain disease. Thus, the final diagnosis is made gradually by differentiation of possible diseases.
Our first attempt consisted in representing knowledge in a rule-based PROLOG system. However, because nearly all information for a sign-oriented differential diagnosis can be represented with very few relations only, we turned to a fact-oriented representation of signs and diseases. Access was possible via PROLOG or an imperative programming language. The index-sequential access on a fact-oriented representation of knowledge was suitable to manage a large knowledge base, which is necessary for a thorough differential diagnosis. A pointer structure was recently examined in order to handle different object-to-object relations. Efficient information processing is now possible which provides short response times using even broad knowledge bases.
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Nash FA. Differential diagnosis. An apparatus to assist the logical faculties. Lancet 1954; 266: 874-5.
- 2 Grams RR, Buchanan P, Massey JK, Jin M. A PC-based free text DSS for health care. Case studies and applications. J Med Syst 1987; 11: 83-93.
- 3 Miller R, Masarie FE, Myers JD. Quick Medical Reference (QMR) for diagnostic assistance. MD Comp 1986; 03: 34-48.
- 4 Wieding JU, Schonle PW, Naue T, Conrad B. Computerunterstiitzte ärztliche Diagnostic. Med Klin 1988; 88: 188-91.
- 5 Shortliffe EH. Medical expert systems -Knowledge tools for physicians. West J Med 1986; 145: 830-9.
- 6 Pople HE. Heuristic methods for imposing structure on ill-structured problems: the structuring of medical diagnostics. In: Szolovits P. ed. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine . Boulder Col: Westview Press; 1982: 119-90.
- 7 Reggia JA, Tuhrim S. Computer-Assisted Medical Decision Making . New York: Springer Verlag; 1985
- 8 Reggia JA, Thurim S. An introduction to computer-assisted medical decision making. MD Comp 1985; 02: 28-36 40-6.
- 9 de Vries PH, de Vries PFRobbe. An overview of medical expert systems. Meth Inform Med 1985; 24: 57-64.
- 10 Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH. Rule Based Expert Systems, the MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project . Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley; 1984
- 11 Shortliffe EH. Computer Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. New York: Elsevier; 1976
- 12 Miller RA, Pople HE, Myers Jr, Myers JD. INTERNIST-I, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Eng J Med 1982; 307: 468-76.
- 13 Bouckaert A. Medical diagnosis: Are expert systems needed?. Int J Biomed Comp. 1987; 20: 123-33.
- 14 Puppe B, Puppe F. A knowledge representation concept facilitating construction and maintenance of large knowledge bases. Meth Inform Med 1988; 27: 10-6.
- 15 Walker MG, Blum R, Fagan LM. MINIMYCIN: A miniature rule-based system. MD Comp 1985; 02: 21-7 46.
- 16 Appelrath HJ. Von Datenbanken zu Expertensystemen . Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1985
- 17 van Bemmel JH. Formalization of medical knowledge. Meth Inform Med 1986; 25: 191-3.
- 18 Vogl H. Differentialdiagnose der medizinisch-klinischen Symptome . München: UTB Ernst-Reinhard Verlag; 1981
- 19 Gross R, Schölmerich P, Gerok W. Lehr-buch der Inneren Medizin . Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlag; 1987
- 20 Braunwald E, Isselbach KJ, Petersdorf RG, Wilson JD, Martin JB, Fauci AS. Harrisons’ Principles of Internal Medicine . New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1987
- 21 Wieding JU, Kretschmar T, Schonle PW. Mengen und Abbildungen in wissens-basierten Systemen zur Unterstiitzung der Diagnose-Findung. Angewandte Informatik 1988; 08: 337-41.
- 22 Lindberg G, Bjorkman A, Knill-Jones RP. Computer aided diagnosis for jaundice. A comparison of two databases. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1987; 128: 180-8.
- 23 Miller RA. INTERNIST-1/CADUCEUS: Problems facing expert consultant programs. Meth Inform Med 1984; 23: 9-14.
- 24 Kingsland LC, Lindberg DAB, Sharp GC. Anatomy of a knowledge-based consultant system: AI/RHEUM. MD Comp 1986; 03: 18-26.
- 25 Pohl B, Trendelenburg C. Pro.M.D. – A diagnostic expert system shell for clinical chemistry test result interpretation. Meth Inform Med 1988; 27: 111-7.
- 26 Langlotz CP, Fagan LM, Tu SW, Sikic BI, Shortliffe EH. A therapy planning architecture that combines decision theory and artificial intelligence techniques. Comp Biomed Res 1987; 20: 279-303.
- 27 Haux R. Expertensysteme in der Medizin, eine einfuhrende Ubersicht. Teil 1. Software Kurier 1988; 01: 65-77.
- 28 Clancey WJ. From GUIDON to NEOMYCIN and HERACLES in twenty short lessons: ORN final report 1979-1985. AI Magazine 1986; 07: 40-60 187.
- 29 Adlassnig KP, Kolarz G, Scheithauer W. Present state of the medical expert system CADIAG-2. Meth Inf Med 1985; 24: 13-20.