Methods Inf Med 1993; 32(03): 214-218
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634931
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Significant Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Subjects with Normal Resting Pressures but Exaggerated Pressure Response During Light Exertion

C. E. Cannon
1   Pitt County Memorial Medical Center and East Carolina Heart Institute, Greenville NC, USA
,
A. F. Bowyer
1   Pitt County Memorial Medical Center and East Carolina Heart Institute, Greenville NC, USA
,
R. A. Thomas
1   Pitt County Memorial Medical Center and East Carolina Heart Institute, Greenville NC, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

Abstract:

Concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) frequently occurs in subjects with normal resting systolic and diastolic pressures (SP and DP, respectively). LVH in this normotensive-hypertrophic group (NH) may be due to an abnormally exaggerated pressure response to exercise. The SP and DP responses to exercise were studied in 130 subjects free from coronary artery disease or cardiomyopathy. The NH subjects (n = 35) had normal resting pressure (SP ≤140 and DP ≤85 mmHg) and increased LV wall thickness (T) by echocardiography (T >1.1 cm). A normal control group (NN) (n = 57) and a hypertensive control group (HH) (n = 23) were simultaneously evaluated. The original groups, subgroups censored for age and weight, and matched-pair subgroups demonstrated greater exercise SP for NH than for NN (p <0.005). Moreover, the rate of SP increase with exercise was greater for NH than for NN or HH (p <0.05). Hence, an exaggerated exercise SP response may have been the stimulus for LVH in these NH subjects.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Alderman MH. Treatment-induced blood pressure reduction and the risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA 1989; 262: 920-4.
  • 2 Kaplan NM. Systemic hypertension: Mechanisms and diagnosis. In: Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. . Braunwald E. ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1988
  • 3 Ghali JK. Prognostic role of left ventricular hypertrophy independent of coronary artery disease (Abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 258 A..
  • 4 Kannel WB, Doyle JT, McNamara PM, Quickenton P, Gordon T. Precursors of sudden coronary death: factors related to the incidence of sudden death. Circulation 1975; 51: 606-13.
  • 5 Kannel WB, Dannenberg AL, Levy D. Population implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60: 851-931.
  • 6 Dunn FG, Chandraratna P, deCarvalho JG, Basta LL, Frohlich ED. Pathophysiologic assessment of hypertensive heart disease with echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1977; 39: 789-95.
  • 7 Levy D, Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 956-60.
  • 8 Devereux RB, Pickering TG, Harshfield GA. et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension: importance of blood pressure response to regularly recurring stress. Circulation 1983; 68: 470-6.
  • 9 Ren J-F, Hakki A-H, Kotler MN, Iskand-rian AS. Exercise systolic blood pressure: a powerful determinant of increased left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 05: 1224-31.
  • 10 Gupta A. Systolic blood pressure response to exercise predicts incident hypertension: The Framingham offspring study (Abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 257 A..
  • 11 Azevedo J. Echocardiographic study of hypertensive stress test response subjects (Abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 257 A..
  • 12 McCaffrey FM. Relationship between left ventricular mass and cardiovascular reactivity in children (Abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 257 A..