Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1993; 32(05): 345-348
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634949
Editorial
Schattauer GmbH

Decision-Support Systems as Safety-Critical Components: Towards a Safety Culture for Medical Informatics

J. Fox
1   Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, U.K
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Fox J, Barber DC, Bardhan KD. Alternatives to Bayes: A quantitative comparison with rule-base diagnosis. Meth Inform Med 1980; 19: 210-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Heathfield HA, Wyatt J. Philosophies for the design and development of clinical decision-support systems. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 1-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Szolovitz P, Pauker SG. A coherent philosophy for development or a straight-jacket for research? (Editorial Commentary). Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 16-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fox J. On the soundness and safety of expert systems. Artif Intel] Med 1993; 05: 1-21.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Huang J, Fox J, Gordon C, Jackson-Smale A. Symbolic decision support in medical care. Artif Intell Med. 1993 (in press.)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 van Harmelin F, Balder J. (ML)2: A formal language for KADS models of expertise. Knowl Acquis 1992; 04: 127-61.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Leveson NG. Software safety: What, when and how?. Comput Surv 1986; 18: 125-63.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Miller RA. Taking inventory of medical decision support software developmentEditorial comment. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 9-11.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Musen MA. Architectures for architects (Editorial commentary). Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 12-3.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Abbot RJ. Resourceful systems for fault tolerance, reliability and safety. ACM Comput Surv 1990; 22: 35-68.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar