J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(S 04): S328-S333
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667043
WFSBS 2016
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Safety and Efficacy of Preoperative Embolization in Patients with Meningioma

Hiroshi Manaka
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
,
Katsumi Sakata
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
,
Junya Tatezuki
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
,
Tadao Shinohara
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
,
Wataru Shimohigoshi
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
,
Tetsuya Yamamoto
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 January 2018

06 June 2018

Publication Date:
23 July 2018 (online)

Abstract

Preoperative embolization for intracranial meningioma has remained controversial for several decades. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed our experience of embolization using particulate embolic material and coil to clarify the therapeutic efficacy, safety, and risk of complication.

Methods We reviewed 69 patients who underwent embolization with particulate embolic material followed by surgical resection. An additional 6 procedures were included for patients in whom recurrence was treated, for a total of 75 procedures of preoperative embolization. We analyzed the following clinical data: age, sex, tumor size pathology, complications related to embolization, and surgeon's opinion on the intraoperative ease of debulking and blood transfusion. Embolization was performed mainly from the branches of the external carotid artery.

Results No allogenic blood transfusions were needed for any patients. The surgeon had the opinion that whitening and softening of the tumor allowed for easy debulking during decompression of the tumor in most of the patients. Hemorrhagic complications were seen in two patients after embolization. Emergency tumor removal was performed in both of those patients, and they were recovered well after surgery. Transient cranial nerve palsy was seen in one patient. One ischemic complication and one allergic complication occurred.

Conclusion Preoperative embolization could give us an advantage in surgery for meningioma. The procedure reduces intraoperative blood loss and operating time by softening the tumor consistency. However, we must pay attention to the possibility of embolic complications and keep the preparation of emergency craniotomy, particularly in patients with large meningiomas.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gruber A, Killer M, Mazal P, Bavinzski G, Richling B. Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas: a 17-years single center experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2000; 43 (01) 18-29
  • 2 Raper DM, Starke RM, Henderson Jr F. , et al. Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas: efficacy, technical considerations, and complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35 (09) 1798-1804
  • 3 Law-ye B, Clarençon F, Sourour NA. , et al. Risks of presurgical embolization of feeding arteries in 137 intracranial meningeal tumors. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (04) 707-714
  • 4 Lazzaro MA, Badruddin A, Zaidat OO, Darkhabani Z, Pandya DJ, Lynch JR. Endovascular embolization of head and neck tumors. Front Neurol 2011; 17 (02) 64
  • 5 Singla A, Deshaies EM, Melnyk V. , et al. Controversies in the role of preoperative embolization in meningioma management. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 35 (06) E17
  • 6 Shah AH, Patel N, Raper DM. , et al. The role of preoperative embolization for intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2013; 119 (02) 364-372
  • 7 Yu SC, Boet R, Wong GK, Lam WW, Poon WS. Postembolization hemorrhage of a large and necrotic meningioma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25 (03) 506-508
  • 8 Carli DF, Sluzewski M, Beute GN, van Rooij WJ. Complications of particle embolization of meningiomas: frequency, risk factors, and outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (01) 152-154
  • 9 Ishihara H, Ishihara S, Niimi J. , et al. The safety and efficacy of preoperative embolization of meningioma with N-butyl cyanoacrylate. Interv Neuroradiol 2015; 21 (05) 624-630
  • 10 Aihara M, Naito I, Shimizu T. , et al. Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas using n-butyl cyanoacrylate. Neuroradiology 2015; 57 (07) 713-719
  • 11 Rodiek SO, Stölzle A, Lumenta ChB. Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas with Embosphere microspheres. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47 (05) 299-305
  • 12 Arai S, Shimizu K, Mizutani T. , et al. Preoperative embolization of meningioma: differences in surgical operability and histopathological changes between Embosphere® and NBCA. World Neurosurg 2017; 111: 113-119
  • 13 Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Lohle PN, Beute GN, Peluso JP. Embolization of meningiomas: comparison of safety between calibrated microspheres and polyvinyl-alcohol particles as embolic agents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34 (04) 727-729
  • 14 Wang HH, Luo CB, Guo WY. , et al. Preoperative embolization of hypervascular pediatric brain tumors: evaluation of technical safety and outcome. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29 (11) 2043-2049