Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2018; 39(05): 399-415
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669992
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

“Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Will Give You a Voice”: Key Practices in AAC Assessment and Intervention as Described by Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

David McNaughton
1   Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
,
Felicia Giambalvo
2   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
,
Kim Kohler
1   Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
,
Godfrey Nazareth
3   X-Biomedical, Wayne, Pennsylvania
,
Jessica Caron
2   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
,
Susan Fager
4   Communication Center of Excellence, Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital, Lincoln, Nebraska
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (pALS) who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) with the AAC assessment and intervention process. Twenty-one pALS with complex communication needs participated in a multipart survey (and follow-up e-mails) to provide information on their experiences with AAC assessment and intervention. A majority of the participants agreed with the importance of three key AAC intervention principles: appropriate staging of the timing of assessment and intervention activities, inclusion of communication partners, and the use of multiple modalities and strategies as communication supports. Most participants reported that their assessment and intervention experiences included at least some aspect of these three key practices. The results of this study suggest that the identified best practices in AAC should be reviewed and implemented on an individualized basis for pALS with complex communication needs.

Keywords

augmentative and alternative communication - amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - communication - assistive technology

Disclosures

Financial: The authors' research is funded by a grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant no. 90RE5017) to the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Augmentative and Alternative Communication (RERC on AAC). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). In addition, the third author is also supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education (no. H325D130021).


Nonfinancial: No relevant nonfinancial relationships exist.


 

  • References

  • 1 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Fact Sheet | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Available at: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Patient-Caregiver-Education/Fact-Sheets/Amyotrophic-Lateral-Sclerosis-ALS-Fact-Sheet . Accessed April 21, 2018
    PubMed
  • 2 Ball LJ, Beukelman DR, Pattee GL. Acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication technology by persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augment Altern Commun 2004; 20 (02) 113-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Beukelman D, Fager S, Nordness A. Communication support for people with ALS. Neurol Res Int 2011. Available at: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/nri/2011/714693/abs/ . Accessed April 21, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Light J, McNaughton D. Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: a new definition for a new era of communication?. Augment Altern Commun 2014; 30 (01) 1-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fried-Oken M, Fox L, Rau MT. , et al. Purposes of AAC device use for persons with ALS as reported by caregivers. Augment Altern Commun 2006; 22 (03) 209-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McKelvey M, Evans DL, Kawai N, Beukelman D. Communication styles of persons with ALS as recounted by surviving partners. Augment Altern Commun 2012; 28 (04) 232-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 McNaughton D, Light J, Groszyk L. “Don't give up”: employment experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2001; 17 (03) 179-195
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Caron J, Light J. “My world has expanded even though I'm stuck at home”: Experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication and social media. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2015; 24 (04) 680-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Doyle M, Phillips B. Trends in augmentative and alternative communication use by individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augment Altern Commun 2001; 17 (03) 167-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Körner S, Sieniawski M, Kollewe K. , et al. Speech therapy and communication device: impact on quality of life and mood in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2013; 14 (01) 20-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Londral A, Pinto A, Pinto S, Azevedo L, De Carvalho M. Quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients and caregivers: impact of assistive communication from early stages. Muscle Nerve 2015; 52 (06) 933-941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Foley G, Timonen V, Hardiman O. Patients' perceptions of services and preferences for care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2012; 13 (01) 11-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ray J. Real-life challenges in using augmentative and alternative communication by persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Comm Disord Quarterly 2015; 36 (03) 187-192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Murphy J. “I Prefer Contact This Close”: Perceptions of AAC by people with motor neurone disease and their communication partners. Augment Altern Commun 2004; 20 (04) 259-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fried-Oken M, Mooney A, Peters B. Supporting communication for patients with neurodegenerative disease. NeuroRehabilitation 2015; 37 (01) 69-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cresswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Lincoln YG, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Corbin J, Strauss AL. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Ezzy D. Qualitative Analysis. Florence, KY: Routledge; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Vaughn S, Schumm JS, Sinagub JM. Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, Bell KR. Management of Motor Speech Disorders in Children and Adults. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 23 King SJ, Duke MM, O'Connor BA. Living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neurone disease (ALS/MND): decision-making about ‘ongoing change and adaptation’. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18 (05) 745-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Light J, McNaughton D. Putting people first: re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Augment Altern Commun 2013; 29 (04) 299-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ball LJ, Beukelman DR, Pattee GL. Communication effectiveness of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Commun Disord 2004; 37 (03) 197-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ball LJ, Pattee GL, Golinker L, Beukelman D. Speech-generating device funding and patterns of acquisition for persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 2015; 24 (04) 155-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 ALS Association. The ALS Association Certified Centers and Clinics. http://www.alsa.org/community/centers-clinics/ . Accessed April 21, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lasker JP, Bedrosian JL. Acceptance of AAC by adults with acquired disorders. In: Beukleman DR, Yorkston KM, Reichle J. , eds. Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Adults with Acquired Neurologic Disorders. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co; 2000: 107-136
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Ball LJ, Lasker J. Teaching partners to support communication for adults with acquired communication impairment. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 2013; 22 (01) 4-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Beukelman DR, Fager S, Ball L, Dietz A. AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: a review. Augment Altern Commun 2007; 23 (03) 230-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Brownlee A, Palovcak M. The role of augmentative communication devices in the medical management of ALS. NeuroRehabilitation 2007; 22 (06) 445-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar