Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681871
BALLOON SPHINCTEROPLASTY IS A SAFE AND RELIABLE METHOD TO ACHIEVE BILIARY CLEARANCE IN AN AT RISK CHOEDOCHOLITHIASIS COHORT
Publication History
Publication Date:
18 March 2019 (online)
Introduction:
Endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty (EBP) has been recommended by ESGE as an alternative to Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) in patients with coagulopathy or alternated anatomy.
Aim:
To investigate the effectiveness of EBP versus ES in managing selected patients with choledocholithiasis at TUH.
Method:
Over one year, patients with untreated coagulopathy or abnormal anatomy, with choledocholithiasis were recruited. Indication, demographics, diagnosis, duct clearance rates, sedation and complications were recorded. EBP was performed with an 8 mm Hurricane Biliary Balloon for ≥4 minutes under direct and fluoroscopic control, with subsequent stone extraction using standard techniques. Outcomes were compared to age and sex matched ES choledocholithiasis patients.
Results:
Of 577 ERCP's, 19 EBPs were performed and compared to 57 matched ES cases. Mean age 62 (21 – 91), 29 (38%) males. Indications: gallstone pancreatitis 4 (5%), choledocholithiasis alone 72 (95%). Findings: Confirmed choledocholithiasis, 15/19 (79%) and 42/57 (74%), normal balloon trawl, 3/19 (16%) and 15/57 (26%) in EBP and ES groups respectively and 1/19 (5%) EPB stricture.
While failure of duct clearance was less common in EBP patients (OR 0.65), the difference was not significant; 87% (13/15) EBP vs. 81% (34/42) ES, p = 0.47. Despite EBP patients being coagulopathic, ES intra-procedural bleeding rates were higher (OR 3.3), again non-significant; EBP 1/19 (5%) vs. ES 9/57 (67), p = 0.4. There were no significant post-procedure complications; procedure duration and mean sedation were comparable.
Conclusion:
EBP was not inferior to ES in selected patients with choledocholithiasis. A low bleeding rate despite coagulopathy, with effective duct clearance suggests EBP warrants further investigation.
#