Synlett 2020; 31(03): 223
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1691581
cluster
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Cluster Preface: Biocatalysis

Todd K. Hyster
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 17 December 2019

Accepted: 17 December 2019

Publication Date:
28 January 2020 (online)

 


Published as part of the Cluster Biocatalysis

Abstract

Enzymes are valuable catalysts in chemical synthesis because they offer levels of efficiency and product selectivity that surpass what can be achieved using traditional catalytic strategies. This Cluster highlights advances in this important field, highlighting different ways in which biocatalysis can be used in organic chemistry.


#

The use of enzymes as catalysts for chemical synthesis has witnessed remarkable growth in the last decade. As academic and industrial researchers continue to utilize these catalysts in new and fascinating ways, biocatalysts are becoming essential tools for modern synthetic organic chemists.[1] In this issue, we highlight some important work in this field, with contributions from groups that view this area from unique perspectives.

From upstate New York, Fasan and co-workers demonstrate that evolved myoglobin variants can catalyze carbene insertions into aliphatic N–H bonds.[2] The enzyme is able to control the chemoselectivity of the transformation, affording only product from a single N–H bond insertion. This work highlights the ability of metalloproteins to function as catalysts for non-natural reactions and underscores the opportunities for enzymes to address selectivity challenges that would be hard to overcome using small molecule catalysts.

Narayan and co-workers review examples where biocatalytic transformations are run in sequence with traditional organic reactions.[3] This includes examples from their group where nonheme iron dioxygenases are used to prepare ­ortho-quinone methides in situ that can react with alkenes and nucleophiles to provide substituted phenols and ethers.

Berkowitz and co-workers share their work conducting Hammett linear free energy relationship studies on a substrate promiscuous ketoreductase discovered by their lab.[4] They find that the rate-determining step is dependent on the electronics of the substrate, with hydride transfer from NADPH being rate determining with β-keto esters and aldehydes, and acetal dehydration determining the rate with trifluoromethyl ketones.

Finally, Hyster highlights his groups recent developments in photoenzymatic catalysis with substrate promiscuous oxidoreductases.[5] This work demonstrates that visible light irradiation is a viable mechanism for achieving new enzyme functions.This Cluster serves as our first foray into this very exciting and impactful area of synthetic chemistry. As biocatalysis continues to grow in the coming years, we anticipate it will cement itself as a vital tool for modern chemical synthesis. This is an area where groups from across the world are making important advances and we are excited to see where it goes in the years to come.


#
  • References

  • 1 Huffman MA, Fryszkowska A, Alvizo O, Borra-Garske M, Campos KR, Canada KA, Devine PN, Duan D, Forstater JH, Grosser ST, Halsey HM, Hughes GJ, Jo J, Joyce LA, Kolev JN, Liang J, Maloney KM, Mann BF, Marshall NM, McLaughlin M, Moore JC, Murphy GS, Nawrat CC, Nazor J, Novick S, Patel NR, Rodriguez-Granillo A, Robaire SA, Sherer EC, Truppo MD, Whittaker AM, Verma D, Xiao L, Xu Y, Yang H. Science 2019; 366: 1255
  • 2 Streck V, Sreenilayam G, Fasan R. Synlett 2020; 31: 224
  • 3 Doyon TJ, Narayan AR. H. Synlett 2020; 31: 230
  • 4 Kudalkar GP, Tiwari VK, Lee JD, Berkowitz DB. Synlett 2020; 31: 237
  • 5 Hyster TK. Synlett 2020; 31: 248

  • References

  • 1 Huffman MA, Fryszkowska A, Alvizo O, Borra-Garske M, Campos KR, Canada KA, Devine PN, Duan D, Forstater JH, Grosser ST, Halsey HM, Hughes GJ, Jo J, Joyce LA, Kolev JN, Liang J, Maloney KM, Mann BF, Marshall NM, McLaughlin M, Moore JC, Murphy GS, Nawrat CC, Nazor J, Novick S, Patel NR, Rodriguez-Granillo A, Robaire SA, Sherer EC, Truppo MD, Whittaker AM, Verma D, Xiao L, Xu Y, Yang H. Science 2019; 366: 1255
  • 2 Streck V, Sreenilayam G, Fasan R. Synlett 2020; 31: 224
  • 3 Doyon TJ, Narayan AR. H. Synlett 2020; 31: 230
  • 4 Kudalkar GP, Tiwari VK, Lee JD, Berkowitz DB. Synlett 2020; 31: 237
  • 5 Hyster TK. Synlett 2020; 31: 248