Translating Research into Agile Development (TRIAD): Development of Electronic Health Record Tools for Primary Care Settings

Abstract

Objectives This article describes a method for developing electronic health record (EHR) tools for use in primary care settings.

Methods The “Translating Research into Agile Development” (TRIAD) method relies on the close collaboration of researchers, end users, and development teams. This five-step method for designing a tailored EHR tool includes (1) assessment, observation, and documentation; (2) structured engagement for collaboration and iterative data collection; (3) data distillation; (4) developmental feedback from clinical team members on high-priority EHR needs and input on design prototypes and EHR functionality; and (5) agile scrum sprint cycles for prototype development.

Results The TRIAD method was used to modify an existing EHR for behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) embedded with primary care teams, called the BH e-Suite. The structured engagement processes stimulated discussions on how best to automate BHC screening tools and provide goal tracking functionality over time. Data distillation procedures rendered technical documents, with information on workflow steps, tasks, and associated challenges. In the developmental feedback phase, BHCs gave input on screening assessments, scoring needs, and other functionality to inform prototype feature development. Six 2-week sprint cycles were conducted to address three domains of prototype development: assessment and documentation needs, information retrieval, and monitoring and tracking. The BH e-Suite tool resulted with eight new EHR features to accommodate BHCs' needs.

Conclusion The TRIAD method can be used to develop EHR functionality to address the evolving needs of health professionals in primary care and other settings. The BH e-Suite was developed through TRIAD and was found to be acceptable, easy to use, and improved care delivery during pilot testing. The BH e-Suite was later adopted by OCHIN Inc., which provided the tool to its 640 community health centers. This suggests that the TRIAD method is a promising research and development approach.

Keywords

clinical informatics - human factors and ergonomics - agile scrum software development methodology - electronic health record systems

• References

• 1 Phillips Jr RL, Bazemore AW, DeVoe JE. , et al. A family medicine health technology strategy for achieving the triple aim for US health care. Fam Med 2015; 47 (08) 628-635
• 2 Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA. , et al; American Medical Informatics Association. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (e1): e2-e8
• 3 Blavin F, Ramos C, Shah A, Devers K. Lessons from the Literature On Electronic Health Record Implementation. Washington, DC: National Coordinator for Health Information Technology of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2013
• 4 Ranallo PA, Kilbourne AM, Whatley AS, Pincus HA. Behavioral health information technology: from chaos to clarity. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35 (06) 1106-1113
• 5 Holden RJ, Carayon P, Gurses AP. , et al. SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics 2013; 56 (11) 1669-1686
• 6 Kannan V, Fish J, Willett D. Agile model driven development of electronic health record-based specialty population registries. IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Health Informatics; 2016: 465-468
• 7 Kannan V, Fish JS, Mutz JM. , et al. Rapid development of specialty population registries and quality measures from electronic health record data*. An agile framework. Methods Inf Med 2017; 56 (99) e74-e83
• 8 Basit MA, Baldwin KL, Kannan V. , et al. Agile acceptance test-driven development of clinical decision support advisories: feasibility of using open source software. JMIR Med Inform 2018; 6 (02) e23
• 9 Cohen DJ, Balasubramanian BA, Davis M. , et al. Understanding care integration from the ground up: five organizing constructs that shape integrated practices. J Am Board Fam Med 2015; 28 (Suppl. 01) S7-S20
• 10 Gunn R, Davis MM, Hall J. , et al. Designing clinical space for the delivery of integrated behavioral health and primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2015; 28 (Suppl. 01) S52-S62
• 11 Peek CJ. , National Integration Academy Council. Lexicon for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration: Concepts and Definitions Developed by Expert Consensus. Rockville, MD; 2013. No.13–IP001-EF
• 12 Davis MM, Balasubramanian BA, Cifuentes M. , et al. Clinician staffing, scheduling, and engagement strategies among primary care practices delivering integrated care. J Am Board Fam Med 2015; 28 (September-October, Suppl 1): S32-S40
• 13 Cifuentes M, Davis M, Fernald D, Gunn R, Dickinson P, Cohen DJ. Electronic health record challenges, workarounds, and solutions observed in practices integrating behavioral health and primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2015; 28 (Suppl. 01) S63-S72
• 14 Cohn M. Succeeding with Agile: Software Development Using Scrum. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.; 2010
• 15 Devoe JE, Gold R, Spofford M. , et al. Developing a network of community health centers with a common electronic health record: description of the Safety Net West Practice-based Research Network (SNW-PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2011; 24 (05) 597-604
• 16 Garrett J. The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web and Beyond. San Francisco, CA: New Riders Press; 2010
• 17 Woodson TT, Gunn R, Clark KD. , et al. Designing health information technology tools for behavioral health clinicians integrated within US-based primary care teams. J Innov Health Inform 2018; 25 (03) 158-168
• 18 Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D. , et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31 (12) 2805-2816
• 19 Miller B. Why is EHR software so difficult to modify and improve? In: Lab Soft News. Vol. 20182017.
• 20 Gottlieb L, Tobey R, Cantor J, Hessler D, Adler NE. Integrating social and medical data to improve population health: opportunities and barriers. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35 (11) 2116-2123
• 21 Jetelina K, Woodson T, Gunn R. , et al. Evaluation of an electronic health record (EHR) tool for integrated behavioral health in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2018; 31 (05) 712-723
• 22 Ratwani RM, Fairbanks RJ, Hettinger AZ, Benda NC. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (06) 1179-1182
• 23 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Accountable care organizations (ACOs): general information. Available at: https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/ACO/ . Accessed May 10, 2018
• 24 Clark KD, Miller BF, Green LA, de Gruy FV, Davis M, Cohen DJ. Implementation of behavioral health interventions in real world scenarios: managing complex change. Fam Syst Health 2017; 35 (01) 36-45