Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81(05): 579-584
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693700
Original Article

Sellar Remodeling after Surgery for Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenoma: Intercarotid Distance as a Predictor of Recurrence.

Ashley L. B. Raghu 
1   Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2   Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Hannah D. Flower
1   Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Patrick F. X. Statham
3   Department of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Paul M. Brennan
1   Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
3   Department of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Mark A. Hughes
1   Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
3   Department of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction As they grow, pituitary adenoma can remodel the sella turcica and alter anatomical relationships with adjacent structures. The intercarotid distance (ICD) at the level of the sella is a measure of sella width. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess how ICD changes after transsphenoidal surgery and (2) explore whether the extent of ICD change is associated with tumor recurrence.

Methods A retrospective analysis of preoperative and postoperative coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was carried out by two independent assessors on patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. Preoperative tumor volume and any change in ICD following surgery were recorded and compared between groups. Logistic regression models of recurrence were generated.

Results In 36 of 42 patients, ICD fell after surgery (mean = 1.8 mm) and six cases were static. At time of follow-up (mean = 77 months), 25 had not required further intervention and 17 had undergone second surgery or radiosurgery. In patients in whom no further intervention has yet been necessary, the postoperative reduction in ICD was significantly smaller than in those who required repeat intervention (1.1 vs. 2.7 mm respectively, p < 0.01). ICD decrease was weakly correlated with tumor volume (r = 0.35). ICD decrease was a significant predictor of recurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44–6.87), largely independent of tumor volume.

Conclusion For most patients, ICD falls following surgical excision of a nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma. A greater reduction in ICD postsurgery appears to predict recurrence. Change in ICD shows promise as a radiographic tool for prognosticating clinical course after surgery.

Keywords

pituitary adenoma - sella turcica - magnetic resonance imaging - recurrence - intercarotid distance


Publication History

Received: 05 March 2019

Accepted: 03 June 2019

Article published online:
24 July 2019

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • References

  • 1 Velayudhan V, Luttrull MD, Naidich TP. Sella turcica and pituitary gland. In: Naidich T, Castillo M, Cha S, Smirniotopoulos J. , eds. Imaging of the Brain. 1st ed.: Expert Radiology Series. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2012: 22
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Banu MA, Guerrero-Maldonado A, McCrea HJ. et al. Impact of skull base development on endonasal endoscopic surgical corridors. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014; 13 (02) 155-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Tatreau JR, Patel MR, Shah RN. et al. Anatomical considerations for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in pediatric patients. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (09) 1730-1737
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nunes CF, Cabral GAPS, Mello Junior JO, Lapenta MA, Landeiro JA. Pituitary macroadenoma: analysis of intercarotid artery distance compared to controls. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2016; 74 (05) 396-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ahmadipour Y, Lemonas E, Maslehaty H. et al. Critical analysis of anatomical landmarks within the sphenoid sinus for transsphenoidal surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (11) 3929-3936
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Serra C, Staartjes VE, Maldaner N. et al. Predicting extent of resection in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (11) 2255-2262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lin B-J, Chung T-T, Lin M-C. et al. Quantitative analysis of anatomical relationship between cavernous segment internal carotid artery and pituitary macroadenoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (41) e5027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Manara R, Gabrieli J, Citton V. et al. Intracranial internal carotid artery changes in acromegaly: a quantitative magnetic resonance angiography study. Pituitary 2014; 17 (05) 414-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yilmazlar S, Kocaeli H, Eyigor O, Hakyemez B, Korfali E. Clinical importance of the basal cavernous sinuses and cavernous carotid arteries relative to the pituitary gland and macroadenomas: quantitative analysis of the complete anatomy. Surg Neurol 2008; 70 (02) 165-174 , discussion 174–175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mascarella MA, Forghani R, Di Maio S. et al. Indicators of a reduced intercarotid artery distance in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (03) 195-201
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sasagawa Y, Tachibana O, Doai M, Akai T, Tonami H, Iizuka H. Internal carotid arterial shift after transsphenoidal surgery in pituitary adenomas with cavernous sinus invasion. Pituitary 2013; 16 (04) 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Serra C, Maldaner N, Muscas G. et al. The changing sella: internal carotid artery shift during transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Pituitary 2017; 20 (06) 654-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993; 33 (04) 610-617 , discussion 617–618
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chang EF, Zada G, Kim S. et al. Long-term recurrence and mortality after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for nonfunctional pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (04) 736-745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Losa M, Mortini P, Barzaghi R. et al. Early results of surgery in patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma and analysis of the risk of tumor recurrence. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (03) 525-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ho R-W, Huang H-M, Ho J-T. The influence of pituitary adenoma size on vision and visual outcomes after trans-sphenoidal adenectomy: a report of 78 cases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2015; 57 (01) 23-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Davies BM, Carr E, Soh C, Gnanalingham KK. Assessing size of pituitary adenomas: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative methods on MR. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (04) 677-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wang J, Wang R, Lu Y, Yao Y, Qi S. Anatomical analysis on the lateral bone window of the sella turcica: a study on 530 adult dry skull base specimens. Int J Med Sci 2014; 11 (02) 134-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Campero A, Martins C, Yasuda A, Rhoton Jr AL. Microsurgical anatomy of the diaphragma sellae and its role in directing the pattern of growth of pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (03) 717-723 , discussion 717–723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Won H-S, Han S-H, Oh C-S, Lee J-I, Chung I-H, Kim SH. Topographic variations of the optic chiasm and the foramen diaphragma sellae. Surg Radiol Anat 2010; 32 (07) 653-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar