The Adoption of the Electronic Health Record by Physicians

Saja A. Al-Rayes; Arwa Alumran; Weam AlFayez

doi:10.1055/s-0039-1695006

Methods of Information in Medicine, Table of Contents

Methods Inf Med 2019; 58(02/03): 063-070
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695006

Original Article

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Adoption of the Electronic Health Record by Physicians

Saja A. Al-Rayes

¹Department of Health Information Management Technology, Public Health College, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

,

Arwa Alumran

¹Department of Health Information Management Technology, Public Health College, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

,

Weam AlFayez

²Health Informatics Department, King Fahd Military Medical Complex, Dhahran City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

³Department of Health Information Management and Technology, Public Health College, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Health information technology, especially the electronic health record (EHR) systems, improves health care quality and patient safety.

Objectives This study's objectives are as follows: first, to explore the adoption of EHR systems among physicians in Saudi Arabia (with King Fahd Military Medical Complex as the location of the pilot study), and second, to identify the factors that influence these physicians' adoption of such systems.

Methods This cross-sectional quantitative study is based on a paper survey that was administered to a sample of 213 physicians. The theoretical model is a version of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) that features the following additional variables: resistance to change, training, and social influence.

Results The sample includes 133 (62%) physicians who used EHRs and 80 (38%) who did not. The main findings show that users and nonusers of the EHR system differ significantly for several factors such as perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social influence, and resistance to change. In addition, age, work experience, and medical specialty are significantly associated with physicians' use of the EHR system.

Conclusion To increase EHR systems' adoption rate, the following elements should be improved: the systems' design, the social environments, and the physicians' awareness of the systems' benefits. This is the first study to produce a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the factors that influences physicians' use of the EHR system at a Saudi hospital in the Eastern Province. Further studies are needed to measure how these factors influence physicians' use of EHRs in other settings.

Keywords

adoption - electronic health record system - physicians - validation - instrument - technology acceptance model

Full Text

References

References
1 Häyrinen K, Saranto K, Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77 (05) 291-304
2 HIMMS. health information and technology resource library. Available at: https://www.himss.org/library/ehr . Accessed November 7, 2018
3 Jamoom E, Beatty P, Bercovitz A, Woodwell D, Palso K, Rechtsteiner E. Physician adoption of electronic health record systems: United States, 2011. NCHS Data Brief 2013; (98) 1-8
4 Ash JS, Bates DW. Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12 (01) 8-12
5 Aldosari B. Health ATMs in Saudi Arabia: a perspective. Acta Inform Med 2017; 25 (02) 130-135
6 Poon EG, Blumenthal D, Jaggi T, Honour MM, Bates DW, Kaushal R. Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004; 23 (04) 184-190
7 Angst CM, Agarwal R. Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: the elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. Manage Inf Syst Q 2009; 33 (02) 339-370
8 Xierali IM, Hsiao C-J, Puffer JC. , et al. The rise of electronic health record adoption among family physicians. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11 (01) 14-19
9 Esmaeilzadeh P, Sambasivan M. Healthcare professionals' adoption of clinical it in hospital: A view of relationship between healthcare professionals and hospital. Management 2012; 2 (05) 161-170
10 Aljarullah A, Crowder R, Wills G. A framework for the adoption of EHRs by primary healthcare physicians in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int Conf Inf Soc 2017; 49-54 ; Doi: 10.23919/i-Society.2017.8354670
11 Najaftorkaman M, Ghapanchi AH, Talaei-Khoei A, Ray P. A taxonomy of antecedents to user adoption of health information systems: a synthesis of thirty years of research. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2015; 66 (03) 576-598
12 Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Dehnad A, Noruzi A, Gohari M. Applying electronic medical records in health care: physicians' perspective. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (02) 341-354
13 Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Gohari M, Noruzi A. The effects of organizational contextual factors on physicians' attitude toward adoption of Electronic Medical Records. J Biomed Inform 2015; 53: 174-179
14 Cheung CS, Tong EL, Cheung NT. , et al. Factors associated with adoption of the electronic health record system among primary care physicians. JMIR Med Inform 2013; 1 (01) e1
15 Cho KW, Kim SM, An C-H, Chae YM. Diffusion of electronic medical record based public hospital information systems. Healthc Inform Res 2015; 21 (03) 175-183
16 Lakbala P, Dindarloo K. Physicians' perception and attitude toward electronic medical record. Springerplus 2014; 3 (01) 63
17 Morton ME, Wiedenbeck S. A framework for predicting EHR adoption attitudes: a physician survey. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2009; 6 (Fall): 1a
18 Hamamura FD, Withy K, Hughes K. Identifying barriers in the use of electronic health records in Hawai'i. Hawaii J Med Public Health 2017; 76 (03) (Suppl. 01) 28-35
19 Tilahun B, Fritz F. Comprehensive evaluation of electronic medical record system use and user satisfaction at five low-resource setting hospitals in ethiopia. JMIR Med Inform 2015; 3 (02) e22
20 Gagnon M-P, Ghandour K, Talla PK. , et al. Electronic health record acceptance by physicians: testing an integrated theoretical model. J Biomed Inform 2014; 48: 17-27
21 Archer N, Cocosila M. A comparison of physician pre-adoption and adoption views on electronic health records in Canadian medical practices. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13 (03) e57
22 Kim S, Lee K-H, Hwang H, Yoo S. Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16 (01) 12
23 Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. 1980
24 Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50 (02) 179-211
25 Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovation. 4th ed. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1995
26 Davis FD, Bagozzi R, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989; 35 (08) 982-1003
27 Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manage Inf Syst Q 2003; 27 (03) 425-478
28 Yu H, Jiang S, Land KC. Multicollinearity in hierarchical linear models. Soc Sci Res 2015; 53: 118-136
29 Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2005
30 Fox J. Regression Diagnostics: An Introduction. Vol. 79. London: Sage University Paper; 1991
31 Heberlein TA, Baumgartner R. Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature. Am Sociol Rev 1978; 43 (04) 447-462
32 Iqbal U, Ho C-H, Li Y-C, Nguyen P-A, Jian W-S, Wen H-C. The relationship between usage intention and adoption of electronic health records at primary care clinics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2013; 112 (03) 731-737
33 Sherifi D. Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Impact on Patient Portal Use. Minneapolis, MN: Walden University; 2018
34 Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q 1989; 13 (03) 319-340
35 Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N. Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test. Eur J Inf Syst 2007; 16 (06) 725-737
36 Beglaryan M, Petrosyan V, Bunker E. Development of a tripolar model of technology acceptance: Hospital-based physicians' perspective on EHR. Int J Med Inform 2017; 102: 50-61
37 Bawack RE, Kala Kamdjoug JR. Adequacy of UTAUT in clinician adoption of health information systems in developing countries: the case of Cameroon. Int J Med Inform 2018; 109: 15-22
38 Hsu C-C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess, Res Eval 2007; 12 (10) 1-8
39 Nunnally JC, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology). Vol. 3. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994
40 Meyer R, Krueger D. Minitab guide to statistics. Prentice Hall PTR; 2001
41 Brosius F. SPSS 19. Germany: MITP-Verlags GmbH & Co. KG; 2011
42 Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58 (02) 107-112
43 Acock AC. Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and family 2005; 67 (04) 1012-1028
44 Steininger K, Stiglbauer B. EHR acceptance among Austrian resident doctors. Health Policy Technol 2015; 4 (02) 121-130
45 King WR, He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage 2006; 43 (06) 740-755
46 Ma Q, Liu L. The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. J Organ End User Comput 2004; 16 (01) 59-72
47 Hossain A, Quaresma R, Rahman H. Investigating factors influencing the physicians' adoption of electronic health record (EHR) in healthcare system of Bangladesh: an empirical study. Int J Inf Manage 2019; 44: 76-87
48 Terry AL, Giles G, Brown JB, Thind A, Stewart M. Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers' perspective. Fam Med 2009; 41 (07) 508-512
49 Morton ME, Wiedenbeck S. EHR acceptance factors in ambulatory care: a survey of physician perceptions. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2010; 7: 1c
50 Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, McDaniel Jr RR. Same organization, same electronic health records (EHRs) system, different use: exploring the linkage between practice member communication patterns and EHR use patterns in an ambulatory care setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (03) 382-391
51 Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf Syst Res 1991; 2 (03) 173-191
52 Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inf Syst Res 1995; 6 (02) 144-176
53 Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Manage Sci 1996; 42 (01) 85-92

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material