Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2020; 81(05): 430-441
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701620
Original Article

Collision of Priorities in Posttraumatic Coma and Suspected Multiple Injuries: A Prospective Multicenter Trial

Raimund Firsching
1   Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Universitätsklinikum, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Magdeburg, Germany
,
Benjamin Voellger
2   Otto-von-Guericke-Universitaet, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Magdeburg, Germany
,
Dieter Woischneck
3   Klinikum Landshut, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Landshut, Germany
,
Ali Mohammed Rashidi
4   Klinik für Neurochirurgie Magdeburg, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany
,
Rebecca König
4   Klinik für Neurochirurgie Magdeburg, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany
,
Michael Luchtmann
4   Klinik für Neurochirurgie Magdeburg, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The presence of multiple injuries in addition to a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is initially uncertain in most patients with posttraumatic coma. The interdisciplinary team of physicians in charge of initial treatment after hospital admission may face a collision of vital priorities. The purpose of this study was to analyze which diagnostic and surgical measures were given priority over others in comatose patients after injury and to draw conclusions from these data.

Methods In this prospective multicenter cohort study, the outcomes of 1,003 comatose patients with suspected multiple injuries were studied. The analysis was divided into an early and a late stage. Diagnostic and surgical measures were analyzed for a 6-month period. The prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grading scale were investigated.

Results Removal of intracranial hematomas and decompressive craniotomies were the most frequent procedures within the first 48 hours after admission to the hospital. Prognosis depends on the location and the combination of injuries. Outcome is significantly correlated to initial signs of brainstem dysfunction. The GCS did not adequately predict clinical outcome.

Conclusion Comatose patients with suspected multiple injuries should only be admitted to hospitals with a continuous neurosurgical service because intracranial operations are more frequent in the first 48 hours than extracranial operations. Depending on the neurologic status of the patient, an urgent surgical decompression may be essential for a good outcome. The GCS alone is not a sufficient tool for the neurologic assessment and the prognosis of patients with multiple injuries. The onset of clinical signs of brainstem dysfunction indicates a critical deterioration of the functioning of the central nervous system. The priority of surgical measures should be tailored accordingly.

Keywords

multiple injuries - brain injury - coma - collision of priorities


Publication History

Received: 15 January 2019

Accepted: 04 July 2019

Article published online:
21 May 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • References

  • 1 Jennett B. Epidemiology of head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996; 60 (04) 362-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Statistisches Bundesamt. Verkehr - Verkehrsunfälle. Wiesbaden, Germany: 2015. . Available at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Verkehrsunfaelle/Publikationen/Downloads-Verkehrsunfaelle/verkehrsunfaelle-jahr-2080700187004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (PMID: . Accessed January 10, 2019)
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Hokema F, Donaubauer B, Busch T, Bouillon B, Kaisers U. Management of multiple injured patients: treatment algorithms according to ATLS principles. Notarzt 2008; 24 (02) 52-58
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Burkhardt M, Hans J, Bauer C, Girmann M, Culemann U, Pohlemann T. Interdisciplinary teamwork in the emergency room: a review of the literature. Intensivmed Notfallmed 2007; 44 (05) 279-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Friedl W, Karches C. Das Schädel-Hirn-Trauma in der chirurgischen Akutversorgung Primärversorgung in einem Krankenhaus der Grund- und Regelversorgung. Der Chirurg. 1996; 67 (11) 1107-1113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Regel G, Lobenhoffer P, Lehmann U, Pape HC, Pohlemann T, Tscherne H. Results of treatment of polytraumatized patients. A comparative analysis of 3,406 cases between 1972 and 1991 [in German]. Unfallchirurg 1993; 96 (07) 350-362
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Braakman R, Avezaat CJ, Maas AI, Roel M, Schouten HJ. Inter observer agreement in the assessment of the motor response of the Glasgow ‘coma’ scale. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1977; 80 (02) 100-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Grewal M, Sutcliffe AJ. Early prediction of outcome following head injury in children: an assessment of the value of Glasgow Coma Scale score trend and abnormal plantar and pupillary light reflexes. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26 (10) 1161-1163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ono J-I, Yamaura A, Kubota M, Okimura Y, Isobe K. Early prediction of an outcome in severe head injury: results of analyses of the Glasgow Coma Scale score, the patient's age, and the CT findings. Japan J Neurosurg 1996; 5 (02) 133-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Chatfield DA. , et al. Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75 (01) 161-162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Becker A, Peleg K, Olsha O, Givon A, Kessel B. ; Israeli Trauma Group. Analysis of incidence of traumatic brain injury in blunt trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale of 12 or less. Chin J Traumatol 2018; 21 (03) 152-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kehoe A, Rennie S, Smith JE. Glasgow Coma Scale is unreliable for the prediction of severe head injury in elderly trauma patients. Emerg Med J 2015; 32 (08) 613-615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Moskopp D, Stähle C, Wassmann H. Problems of the Glasgow Coma Scale with early intubated patients. Neurosurg Rev 1995; 18 (04) 253-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 van Dijck JT, Reith FC, van Erp IA. , et al. Decision making in very severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-5): a literature review of acute neurosurgical management. J Neurosurg Sci 2018; 62 (02) 153-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Servadei F. Coma scales. Lancet 2006; 367 (9510): 548-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Firsching R, Woischneck D, Klein S, Reissberg S, Döhring W, Peters B. Classification of severe head injury based on magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143 (03) 263-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dezernat Wissenschaft Forschung und Ethik. Richtlinie der BÄK zur Feststellung des irreversiblen Hirnfunktionsausfalls. Berlin, Germany: Bundesärztekammer; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Wijdicks EF, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM. ; American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2010; 74 (23) 1911-1918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Brihaye J, Frowein RA, Lindgren S, Loew F, Stroobandt G. Report on the meeting of the W.F.N.S. neuro-traumatology committee, Brussels, 19–23 September 1976. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1978; 40 (01) 181-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gross T, Schüepp M, Attenberger C, Pargger H, Amsler F. Outcome in polytraumatized patients with and without brain injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56 (09) 1163-1174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gögler E, Jungbluth KH. Bedeutung der Mehrfachverletzungen für die klinische Chirurgie. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir 1968; 322 (01) 1079-1085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McDonald SJ, Sun M, Agoston DV, Shultz SR. The effect of concomitant peripheral injury on traumatic brain injury pathobiology and outcome. J Neuroinflammation 2016; 13 (01) 90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Baltas I, Gerogiannis N, Sakellariou P, Matamis D, Prassas A, Fylaktakis M. Outcome in severely head injured patients with and without multiple trauma. J Neurosurg Sci 1998; 42 (02) 85-88
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sarrafzadeh AS, Peltonen EE, Kaisers U, Küchler I, Lanksch WR, Unterberg AW. Secondary insults in severe head injury—do multiply injured patients do worse?. Crit Care Med 2001; 29 (06) 1116-1123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Stulemeijer M, van der Werf SP, Jacobs B. , et al. Impact of additional extracranial injuries on outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23 (10) 1561-1569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gennarelli TA, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Alves WM. Mortality of patients with head injury and extracranial injury treated in trauma centers. J Trauma 1989; 29 (09) 1193-1201 ; discussion 1201–1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lefering R, Paffrath T, Linker R, Bouillon B, Neugebauer EA. ; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie/German Society for Trauma Surgery. Head injury and outcome—what influence do concomitant injuries have?. J Trauma 2008; 65 (05) 1036-1043 ; discussion 1043–1044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Leitgeb J, Mauritz W, Brazinova A, Majdan M, Wilbacher I. Impact of concomitant injuries on outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (05) 659-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 van Leeuwen N, Lingsma HF, Perel P. , et al; International Mission on Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in TBI Study Group; Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury Trial Collaborators; Trauma Audit and Research Network. Prognostic value of major extracranial injury in traumatic brain injury: an individual patient data meta-analysis in 39,274 patients. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (04) 811-818 ; discussion 818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gandhi RR, Overton TL, Haut ER. , et al. Optimal timing of femur fracture stabilization in polytrauma patients: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 77 (05) 787-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Giannoudis PV, Veysi VT, Pape HC, Krettek C, Smith MR. When should we operate on major fractures in patients with severe head injuries?. Am J Surg 2002; 183 (03) 261-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Grotz MRW, Giannoudis PV, Pape HC, Allami MK, Dinopoulos H, Krettek C. Traumatic brain injury and stabilisation of long bone fractures: an update. Injury 2004; 35 (11) 1077-1086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mendelson SA, Dominick TS, Tyler-Kabara E, Moreland MS, Adelson PD. Early versus late femoral fracture stabilization in multiply injured pediatric patients with closed head injury. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21 (05) 594-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Velly L, Pellegrini L, Bruder N. Early or delayed peripheral surgery in patients with severe head injury? [in French]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2010; 29 (09) e183-e188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Frowein RA. Classification of coma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1976; 34 (1–4): 5-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Roozenbeek B, Maas AI, Menon DK. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol 2013; 9 (04) 231-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hennes R, Bernhard M, Büchler M, Popp E. Interdisziplinäres Schockraummanagement von Schwerverletzten. Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie up2date 2011; 5 (03) 171-185
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Frowein RA, Reichmann W, Firsching R. Das Polytrauma aus neurochirurgischer Sicht. In: Der Zerebrale Notfall. Munich, Germany: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Bouillon B, Fach H, Bucheister B, Raum M. Inzidenz des Schädel-Hirn-Traumas - Ergebnisse einer epidemiologischen Analyse über 7 Jahre. Zentralbl Neurochir 1998 59. (04)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Grote S, Böcker W, Mutschler W, Bouillon B, Lefering R. Diagnostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale for traumatic brain injury in 18,002 patients with severe multiple injuries. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28 (04) 527-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Styner JK. The birth of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). Surgeon 2006; 4 (03) 163-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 American College of Surgeons. Advanced Trauma Live Support - ATLS. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Pape HC, Hildebrand F, Krettek C. Decisions and priorities of operative treatment during shock room treatment. Unfallchirurg 2004; 107 (10) 927-936
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Nast-Kolb D, Ruchholtz S, Waydhas C, Taeger G. Management of polytrauma [in German]. Chirurg 2006; 77 (09) 861-872 ; quiz 873
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Dunham CM, Bosse MJ, Clancy TV. , et al; EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. Practice management guidelines for the optimal timing of long-bone fracture stabilization in polytrauma patients: the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. J Trauma 2001; 50 (05) 958-967
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Scannell BP, Waldrop NE, Sasser HC, Sing RF, Bosse MJ. Skeletal traction versus external fixation in the initial temporization of femoral shaft fractures in severely injured patients. J Trauma 2010; 68 (03) 633-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Firsching R, Woischneck D, Langejürgen A. , et al. Clinical, radiologic, and legal significance of “extensor response” in posttraumatic coma. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2015; 76 (06) 456-465
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Firsching R, Woischneck D, Klein S, Ludwig K, Döhring W. Brain stem lesions after head injury. Neurol Res 2002; 24 (02) 145-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Caro DA, Andescavage S, Akhlaghi M, Kalynych C, Wears RL. Pupillary response to light is preserved in the majority of patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 57 (03) 234-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar