PDF icon PDF herunterladen
J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36(05): 353-361
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701663
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Salma A. Abdou
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
David A. Daar
2   Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
,
Stelios C. Wilson
2   Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
,
Vishal Thanik
2   Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

17. April 2019

19. Dezember 2019

Publikationsdatum:
23. Februar 2020 (online)

Auch verfügbar aufMedOne
   Lizenzen und Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Background Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have been shown to significantly reduce pain and narcotic consumption following major abdominal surgeries. This study investigates the literature on their use in microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Patients and Methods A systematic review of TAP blocks in autologous breast reconstruction was performed.

Results Across 10 included studies, 174 patients (5 studies) received an intraoperative TAP block injection, 185 patients (4 studies) received a TAP catheter for intermittent postoperative analgesia, and 325 patients served as controls for a total of 684 included patients. The majority of TAP block delivery techniques were ultrasound guided (7/10 studies). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) was the most commonly used analgesic (4 studies and139 patients) followed by conventional bupivacaine (3 studies and 105 patients). Eight studies found a significant reduction in oral, intravenous, and/or total morphine requirements in the TAP group when either the daily average and/or total inpatient consumption was compared with the control. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for patients undergoing single intraoperative TAP block injection with any analgesic as compared with standard narcotic-based protocols (mean difference= −0.95 days; 95% CI: −1.72 to −0.17 days; p = 0.02). Looking at TAP blocks specifically with LB, there was a mean decrease of 0.83 days as compared with the control, which was not statistically significant (95% CI: −1.90 to 0.25 days; p = 0.13).

Conclusion While the current data support the use of TAP blocks in autologous breast reconstruction, additional studies with more standardized protocols should be performed to determine the most optimal practice.

Keywords

Transversus abdominis plane block - liposomal bupivacaine - deep inferior epigastric perforator flap - autologous breast reconstruction - postoperative management - opioid consumption
 

  • References

  • 1 Zhong T, McCarthy C, Min S. , et al. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes. Cancer 2012; 118 (06) 1701-1709
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Jeevan R, Browne JP, Gulliver-Clarke C. , et al. Surgical determinants of patient-reported outcomes following postmastectomy reconstruction in women with breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (05) 1036e-1045e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, Zeijlmans van Emmichoven IA, Werker PM, de Bock GH. Which breast is the best? Successful autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction: patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 43-50
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF. , et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (01) 1-8
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Björklund T. , et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 2005; 14 (03) 201-208
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Hickey OT, Burke SM, Hafeez P, Mudrakouski AL, Hayes ID, Shorten GD. Severity of acute pain after breast surgery is associated with the likelihood of subsequently developing persistent pain. Clin J Pain 2010; 26 (07) 556-560
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Wallace MS, Wallace AM, Lee J, Dobke MK. Pain after breast surgery: a survey of 282 women. Pain 1996; 66 (2–3): 195-205
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Tran TM, Ivanusic JJ, Hebbard P, Barrington MJ. Determination of spread of injectate after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric study. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102 (01) 123-127
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia 2001; 56 (10) 1024-1026
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2007; 104 (01) 193-197
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H, Dahl JB. The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54 (05) 529-535
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 West C, Milner CS. A simple modification to the transversus abdominis plane block provides safe and effective analgesia in TRAM/DIEP flap patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (03) 146e-147e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Vyas KS, Rajendran S, Morrison SD. , et al. Systematic review of liposomal bupivacaine (exparel) for postoperative analgesia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (04) 748e-756e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Fayezizadeh M, Petro CC, Rosen MJ, Novitsky YW. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for abdominal wall reconstruction: pilot study and preliminary outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (04) (Suppl. 02) 151S-159S
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Morales Jr R, Mentz III H, Newall G, Patronella C, Masters III O. Use of abdominal field block injections with liposomal bupivicaine to control postoperative pain after abdominoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (08) 1148-1153
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Afonso A, Oskar S, Tan KS. , et al. Is enhanced recovery the new standard of care in microsurgical breast reconstruction?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (05) 1053-1061
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Salibian AA, Frey JD, Thanik VD, Karp NS, Choi M. Transversus abdominis plane blocks in microsurgical breast reconstruction: analysis of pain, narcotic consumption, length of stay, and cost. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (03) 252e-263e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Zhong T, Ojha M, Bagher S. , et al. Transversus abdominis plane block following abdominally based breast reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14: 424
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Zhong T, Ojha M, Bagher S. , et al. Transversus abdominis plane block reduces morphine consumption in the early postoperative period following microsurgical abdominal tissue breast reconstruction: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (05) 870-878
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Oh J, Pagé MG, Zhong T. , et al. Chronic postsurgical pain outcomes in breast reconstruction patients receiving perioperative transversus abdominis plane catheters at the donor site: a prospective cohort follow-up study. Pain Pract 2017; 17 (08) 999-1007
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Gatherwright J, Knackstedt RW, Ghaznavi AM. , et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of bupivacaine versus liposomal bupivacaine for pain management after unilateral delayed deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (06) 1327-1330
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Hivelin M, Wyniecki A, Plaud B, Marty J, Lantieri L. Ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after breast reconstruction by DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (01) 44-55
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Jablonka EM, Lamelas AM, Kim JN. , et al. Transversus abdominis plane blocks with single-dose liposomal bupivacaine in conjunction with a nonnarcotic pain regimen help reduce length of stay following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (02) 240-251
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Hunter C, Shakir A, Momeni A. , et al. Transversus abdominis plane block and free flap abdominal tissue breast reconstruction: is there a true reduction in postoperative narcotic use?. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (03) 254-259
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Comparing Local Anesthetics for Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block During Abdominally-based Free Flap for Breast Reconstruction. NCT 03700970 Available at: https://clinicaltrialsgov/show/nct03700970 . Accessed 2018
    PubMed
  • 26 Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Microsurgical Breast Recon w/Abdominal Free Flap in Breast CA. NCT 02601027. Available at: https://clinicaltrialsgov/show/nct02601027 . Accessed 2015
    PubMed
  • 27 Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 2008; 107 (06) 2056-2060
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J. , et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2008; 106 (01) 186-191 table of contents.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Baker BW, Villadiego LG, Lake YN. , et al. Transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine for pain control after cesarean delivery: a retrospective chart review. J Pain Res 2018; 11: 3109-3116
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Batdorf NJ, Lemaine V, Lovely JK. , et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (03) 395-402
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Davidge K, Armstrong KA, Brown M. , et al. Shifting autologous breast reconstruction into an ambulatory setting: patient-reported quality of recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (04) 657-665
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Astanehe A, Temple-Oberle C, Nielsen M. , et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for microvascular breast reconstruction is safe and effective. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (01) e1634
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kaoutzanis C, Ganesh Kumar N, O'Neill D. , et al. Enhanced recovery pathway in microvascular autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction: should it become the standard of care?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (04) 841-851
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Sebai ME, Siotos C, Payne RM. , et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for microsurgical breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Bonde C, Khorasani H, Eriksen K, Wolthers M, Kehlet H, Elberg J. Introducing the fast track surgery principles can reduce length of stay after autologous breast reconstruction using free flaps: a case control study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2015; 49 (06) 367-371
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Bonde CT, Khorasani H, Elberg J, Kehlet H. Perioperative optimization of autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (02) 411-414
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Kelley BP, Shauver MJ, Chung KC. Management of acute postoperative pain in hand surgery: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (08) 1610-1619 , 1619.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Baxter R, Bramlett K, Onel E, Daniels S. Impact of local administration of liposome bupivacaine for postsurgical analgesia on wound healing: a review of data from ten prospective, controlled clinical studies. Clin Ther 2013; 35 (03) 312-320.e5
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Cohen SM. Extended pain relief trial utilizing infiltration of Exparel(®), a long-acting multivesicular liposome formulation of bupivacaine: a Phase IV health economic trial in adult patients undergoing open colectomy. J Pain Res 2012; 5: 567-572
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Premkumar A, Samady H, Slone H, Hash R, Karas S, Xerogeanes J. Liposomal bupivacaine for pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, positive-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (07) 1680-1686
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Little A, Brower K, Keller D, Ramshaw B, Janis JE. A cost-minimization analysis evaluating the use of liposomal bupivacaine in reconstructive plastic surgery procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (04) 1269-1274
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Ha AY, Keane G, Parikh R. , et al. The analgesic effects of liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine hydrochlrode administered as a transversus abdominis plane block after abdominally based autologoud microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (01) 35-44
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Egeberg A, Rasmussen MK, Sørensen JA. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (11) 1474-1480
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Kroll SS, Sharma S, Koutz C. , et al; Evans GRD. Postoperative morphine requirements of free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (02) 338-341
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA. , et al. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (06) 1383-1391
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Heller L, Kowalski AM, Wei C, Butler CE. Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of local anesthetic infusion and intravenous narcotic patient-controlled anesthesia pump for pain management after free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (04) 1010-1018
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Tan KJ, Farrow H. Improving postoperative analgesia for transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction; the use of a local anaesthetic infusion catheter. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (02) 206-210
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Spence NZ, Olszynski P, Lehan A, Horn JL, Webb CA. Quadratus lumborum catheters for breast reconstruction requiring transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. J Anesth 2016; 30 (03) 506-509
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Boehmler IV JH, Venturi ML, Nahabedian MY. Decreased narcotic use with an implantable local anesthetic catheter after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (06) 618-620
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Giordano S, Veräjänkorva E, Koskivuo I, Suominen E. Effectiveness of local anaesthetic pain catheters for abdominal donor site analgesia in patients undergoing free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2013; 47 (06) 428-433
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Rozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Taylor GI. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat 2008; 21 (04) 325-333
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Lee TH, Barrington MJ, Tran TM, Wong D, Hebbard PD. Comparison of extent of sensory block following posterior and subcostal approaches to ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38 (03) 452-460
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Yoshiyama S, Ueshima H, Sakai R, Otake H. A posterior TAP block provides more effective analgesia than a lateral TAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a retrospective study. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2016; 2016: 4598583
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Abdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, Brull R. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111 (05) 721-735
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Tsai HC, Yoshida T, Chuang TY. , et al. Transversus abdominis plane block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques. BioMed Res Int 2017; 2017: 8284363
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Wheble GA, Tan EK, Turner M, Durrant CA, Heppell S. Surgeon-administered, intra-operative transversus abdominis plane block in autologous breast reconstruction: a UK hospital experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (12) 1665-1670
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar