Endoscopy 2020; 52(S 01): S283-S284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1704897
ESGE Days 2020 ePoster presentations
Colon and rectum 09:00–17:00 Thursday, April 23, 2020 ePoster area
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

HIGH CLEANSING EFFICACY WITH OVERNIGHT SPLIT DOSING 1 L NER1006 IN BOTH MEN AND WOMEN: POST HOC ANALYSIS OF TWO RANDOMISED PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIALS

J Manning
1   Borders General Hospital, NHS Borders, Melrose, UK
,
L Clayton
2   Norgine, Clinical Development, Harefield, UK
,
MA Alvarez-Gonzalez
3   Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 April 2020 (online)

 
 

    Aims We compared, per gender, the cleansing performance of 1 L polyethylene glycol NER1006 (PLENVU) versus two preparations.

    Methods This post hoc analysis of two phase 3 clinical trials compared the colon cleansing efficacy of pooled PLENVU versus pooled 2L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate (2LPEG) or oral sulfate solution (OSS) using overnight-split dosing. Pooling of arms increased the sample size for subgroup analyses. The primary efficacy endpoint was the bowel cleansing success, assessed by treatment-blinded central readers using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS). Patients with no primary efficacy data were imputed as failures; the resulting estimates of efficacy were therefore conservative. Overall cleansing success and the mean number of high-quality cleansed segments per patient were calculated per gender (males and females).

    Results A total of 1103 patients were included. The pooled PLENVU arm (N = 551) achieved a numerically higher overall cleansing success than the pooled 2LPEG/OSS arm (N = 552) (88.6% vs 86.2%; P = 0.328)([Table]). Overall cleansing success rates were high for NER1006 across gender (86.7%-90.2%), and, versus 2LPEG/OSS, were comparable in men (86.7% vs 88.9%; P = 0.7238) and significantly higher in women (90.2% vs 83.2%; P = 0.0071). The mean number of high-quality cleansed segments per patient was significantly greater with NER1006 than 2LPEG/OSS in all performed comparisons (P < 0.001).

    Tab. 1

    Overall success rates and high-quality segments per patient in all patients and by gender

    All patients

    Male

    Female

    Overall cleansing success rate (Pooled PLENVU vs 2LPEG/OSS), % (n/N)

    88.6%(488/551) vs 86.2%(476/552)

    86.7%(221/255) vs 88.9%(263/296)

    90.2%(267/296) vs 83.2%(213/256)

    1-sided P-value

    0.328

    0.7238

    0.0071

    High-quality cleansed segments per patient (Pooled PLENVU vs 2LPEG/OSS), mean ± SD

    2.3 ± 1.8 vs 1.8 ± 1.8

    2.2 ± 1.8 vs 1.7 ± 1.7

    2.4 ± 1.8 vs 1.8 ± 1.9

    1-sided P-value

    < 0.0001

    0.0006

    0.0005

    Conclusions PLENVU achieved overall cleansing success rates in men and women of similar high magnitude as the overall population. While comparable in men, in women PLENVU achieved a greater overall cleansing success rate versus 2LPEG/OSS. The greater segmental high-quality cleansing with PLENVU is consistent with previous reports on trial-specific assessments.


    #