Semin Liver Dis 2021; 41(02): 109-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716343
Review Article

Alcohol Use Disorder and Hepatitis C Prevention and Care in People Who Inject Drugs: The State of Play

Fabienne Marcellin
1  Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, Marseille, France
,
Antoine Jaquet
2  Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
3  Inserm, ISPED, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
,
Jeffrey V. Lazarus
4  Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
Patricia Molina
5  Department of Physiology and Alcohol and Drug Abuse Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
,
Patrizia Carrieri
1  Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, Marseille, France
› Author Affiliations
Funding F.M. and P.C. were supported by the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les hépatites virales, ANRS) and the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, INSERM). A.J. was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the National Institute of Drug Abuse (grant no. 5U01AI069919). P.M. is supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P60 AA009803). J.V.L. is supported by a Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities Miguel Servet grant (Instituto de Salud Carlos III/ESF, European Union [CP18/00074]) and further acknowledges support to ISGlobal from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities through the “Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019-2023” Program (CEX2018–000806-S) and from the Government of Catalonia through the CERCA Program.
 

Abstract

Safe and effective treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has ushered in an era in which hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination, as set out by the World Health Organization, is possible. However, alcohol use disorder (AUD) has the potential to reduce the benefits of prevention interventions and reduce access to and continuity of HCV care in at-risk populations, such as people who inject drugs (PWID). We review the literature on the consequences of AUD on the effectiveness of HCV prevention and the cascade of care in PWID and provide recommendations for future research in the field of alcohol use and HCV.


#

Alcohol use disorder (AUD), defined as a “maladaptive pattern of alcohol use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress,” encompasses both alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence.[1] It can be identified as the presence of at least two criteria from an 11-item list including consumption of alcohol in larger amounts or during longer periods than intended, difficulties in controlling alcohol consumption, and experiencing cravings, withdrawal syndrome, and/or important social and health-related repercussions of alcohol consumption. Globally, AUD is the most prevalent of all substance use disorders, with more than 100 million estimated cases in 2016.[2]

AUD substantially contributes to the burden of liver disease among people with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, notably to the onset of decompensated cirrhosis[3] and to liver transplantation and mortality.[4] It is also associated with greater liver damage due to its interactions with immune response, cytotoxicity, and oxidative stress.[5] People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for AUD, and alcohol use accounts for more than 40% of liver associated deaths in this population.[6] [Table 1] summarizes the current guidelines for the screening of AUD.

Table 1

Screening for alcohol use disorder

Who should be screened for AUD?[60]

Adults aged 18 years or older[a]

When can AUD be screened for?

In the general population[61]

 During routine medical visits and visits to emergency departments

  As part of patients' regular checkup

 During visits with a change in medical prescriptions

  Particularly when new medications can interact with alcohol.

In HCV-infected patients[11] [42] [62]

 At the time of HCV diagnosis

  To inform about AUD-related risks during liver disease.

 Before and during HCV treatment initiation

  To prevent non-adherence[b]

 After cure, during long-term follow-up

  To reduce the risk of liver disease progression

How to screen for AUD?

 Face-to-face interview[63] which documents in a nonjudgmental way:[c]

  Current and past alcohol use (and use of tobacco and other psychoactive substances)

  The route, quantity, and type of alcohol consumed

  The frequency and pattern of alcohol use

  The circumstances of use, including the typical setting for use

  The self-perceived benefits and consequences of use

 Use of standard questionnaires (either self-administered or face-to-face) such as

  AUDIT[50] [51] [52]

  Its shorter version, AUDIT-C[38] [51] [52] [64]

What to do after positive screening?

 Provide brief behavioral counselling interventions[64]

 Refer patient to an addiction specialist[11]

In HCV-infected patients[11] [42] [62]

In addition to the previous two points:

 Provide access to a multidisciplinary health care team including harm reduction services

 Provide additional support for adherence in HCV-treated patients with ongoing alcohol consumption

Abbreviations: AUD, alcohol use disorder; AUDIT, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test; AUDIT-C, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test - Consumption; HCV, hepatitis C virus.


a AUD screening is especially recommended in certain patient subgroups, such as pregnant women, women planning to conceive, young people, tobacco smokers, or people with health problems, which may be related to alcohol abuse (e.g., high blood pressure, liver disease, depression, and cardiovascular disease).[61]


b Ongoing alcohol use does not affect therapeutic outcomes among adherent direct-acting antiviral treated patients.[44]


c Patients' self-report of certain symptoms (e.g., sleep disturbances, gastrointestinal problems, or frequent headaches after the weekend) can facilitate caregivers in opening the discussion about alcohol use.[63]


Hepatitis C Elimination: Where Are We Now?

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) set out the goal of eliminating HCV as a major public health threat by 2030, defined as an 80% reduction in new infections and a 65% reduction in deaths.[7] Injecting drug use accounts for 23% of new HCV infections and one-third of HCV-related deaths.[8] Current prevention efforts thus center around the population of PWID,[9] [10] which encompasses both individuals actively injecting drugs and those with a history of drug injection.[11] However, this population remains largely undiagnosed and untreated, and continues to drive the HCV epidemic.

According to a modelling study addressing the global timing of HCV elimination in 45 high-income countries,[12] only 9 countries will be able to meet the deadline of the WHO's HCV elimination target by 2030, whereas 30 are not expected to eliminate HCV before 2050. Key elements to achieve HCV elimination include the development of HCV-specific national strategies and guidelines, the decentralization of HCV screening, universal access to affordable direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment, and the implementation of comprehensive HCV-prevention strategies.[13] Micro-elimination initiatives targeting key populations, such as PWID and subsets of PWID, have the potential to accelerate the HCV global elimination process while being less complex and less costly than full-scale country-level HCV initiatives.[14] In the case of PWID, these initiatives rely notably on harm reduction services (e.g., drop-in centers, needle and syringe programs [NSPs], opioid agonist therapy [OAT] sites, and outreach services) as they are major entry points for both HCV screening[15] and “test-and-treat” strategies.[8] However, access to such services remains insufficient globally and must be greatly expanded, as only 1% of PWID are living in countries with a high coverage of NSP and OAT.[16] Micro-elimination among PWID implies scaling up HCV screening to strengthen the initial phases of the HCV continuum of care (i.e., estimating the number of PWID infected, the number of those reached by HCV prevention actions, the percentage of PWID diagnosed, and those aware of their infection) and ensuring that HCV-positive individuals can access appropriate follow-up and care.[15] This will require multidisciplinary approaches involving, notably, physicians from different specialties, such as addiction and HCV specialists and community-based organizations (peers).


#

AUD and HCV: Research Needs

The availability of DAAs, which are safe and highly effective, and the promotion of novel HCV test-and-treat strategies, especially for PWID, have shifted the perspective of research toward exploring interactions between alcohol use and HCV prevention and care. These developments also highlight the need for greater and more innovative research on the impact of alcohol consumption—a modifiable risk factor—on both the effectiveness of prevention interventions and the development or progression of liver disease.[17] Understanding how, when, and to what extent AUD affects hepatitis prevention interventions is an essential step in identifying and promoting novel approaches to reduce the impact of AUD on risk behaviors. It is also crucial to better document the effect of AUD on HCV treatment uptake and response as they represent two main steps of the HCV cascade of care.[18] Despite the existence of review studies focusing on the interactions between alcohol and HCV[19] or addressing global barriers to HCV care among PWID,[9] [20] [21] [22] [23] there is a paucity of reviews specifically targeting the impact of AUD on HCV prevention and care among PWID.


#

Study Objectives and Search Strategy

We present here a narrative review on the effects of AUD on HCV prevention and care among PWID in the era of HCV elimination. Furthermore, we suggest recommendations to improve the assessment of AUD and to reduce its health impact in this at-risk population. Issues concerning long-term follow-up of HCV-infected PWID after hepatitis C cure have not been explored.

PubMed and the Cochrane library were searched in April 2020 for alcohol use, HCV Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), and free-text terms. We included only articles referring to alcohol use in people at risk of hepatitis C attending NSPs or on OAT (methadone or buprenorphine), people receiving educational interventions for hepatitis C prevention, or people benefiting from hepatitis C screening and linkage to care. We excluded studies that did not allow for distinguishing between alcohol and drug use and those that did not assess the effect of alcohol use on hepatitis C transmission risk or engagement in care.


#

Effect of AUD on HCV Prevention among People Who Inject Drugs

A variety of risk reduction interventions exist to prevent HCV in PWID,[24] including NSP and/or OAT, primarily based on methadone or buprenorphine treatment,[25] peer education interventions, and the recent implementation of test-and-treat strategies. The four primary outcomes of interest when studying the effect of alcohol use on the effectiveness of HCV prevention interventions are (1) seroconversion, (2) persistent injection, (3) sharing of needles, syringes, or other injecting equipment, and (4) unsafe sexual behaviors.

Among PWID, AUD is associated with a higher risk of engaging in unprotected sex and unsafe injecting practices, being HCV-positive, and maintaining injecting practices[26] [27] [28] [29] [30] ([Fig. 1]). While the injecting of alcohol itself is rare, it also constitutes a risk behavior in PWID, especially in marginalized individuals. Within this population, alcohol injection is associated with homelessness and the sharing of cookers or filters.[31]

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Impact of AUD on HCV prevention and cascade of care. AUD, alcohol use disorder; HCV, hepatitis C virus; NSP, needle and syringe programs; OAT, opioid agonist therapy; PWID, people who inject drugs.

Few studies have specifically investigated the influence of alcohol use on injecting behavior in PWID exposed to NSP. Indeed, in many prevention studies, information about alcohol use is embedded under the term drug and alcohol use, making it nearly impossible to distinguish the impact of AUD from that of drug use. One study that examined 196 PWID in Rhode Island[28] showed that individuals participating in NSP and who met the criteria for alcohol abuse (according to the third version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-III) had at least a twofold greater risk of needle sharing compared with nondrinkers and moderate alcohol users, even after controlling for other demographic and behavioral factors. A more recent study[26] of 315 male PWID in rural Puerto Rico attending NSP showed that at-risk alcohol drinking compared with low-risk drinking and no drinking was associated with increased injecting-related and sexual-related risk behaviors. Another study showed that among 296 male PWID in Nepal, the unavailability of new needles and drinking alcohol were independently associated with sharing injecting equipment among PWID.[27]

In addition to the evidence on the association between alcohol use and injecting-related risk behaviors, evidence suggests that the type of drugs injected may also have an impact on alcohol use. For example, people who inject stimulants have been shown to be significantly more likely to report AUD than people who exclusively inject opiates.[32] As such, further investigation is required to understand whether the concomitant use of alcohol and specific classes of drugs increases the risk of parenteral transmission of HCV through a higher frequency of unsafe injections.

In high-income countries, AUD is frequent in individuals receiving methadone treatment.[33] Several studies have shown that AUD increases HCV risk behaviors in individuals receiving OAT. In a U.S. study of 386 individuals entering integrated buprenorphine/naloxone and HIV care, alcohol use during the previous 30 months (irrespective of amount) was associated with an increased risk of unprotected sex.[34] Another U.S. study conducted among 515 women receiving methadone maintenance treatment showed that those diagnosed with alcohol abuse or dependence disorder (according to the DSM-IV classification) had a more than twofold risk of unprotected sexual encounters and an 11-fold risk of having anal sex compared with other women.[35] Similarly, a study conducted among 1,253 HIV-infected PWID entering detoxification or methadone maintenance treatment in New York City showed that drinking more than 14 alcohol drinks per week for males or seven alcohol drinks per week for females was associated with higher rates of injecting and sexual risk behaviors.[36]

In France, the community-based AERLI (Accompanying [support] and Educating to the Risk Linked to Injection) intervention provided face-to-face harm reduction educational sessions to PWID to decrease HIV- and HCV-related risk practices and other injecting-related complications.[37] More than half of the 271 study participants reported harmful alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C [Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test - Consumption] score[38] ≥ 3 for women and ≥ 4 for men) at enrolment, which was associated with an increased risk of unsafe HIV–HCV transmission practices.[37] However, results showed no significant association between harmful alcohol consumption and HCV testing uptake.[39]


#

Effect of AUD on HCV Treatment Uptake

AUD has been associated with advanced liver disease stage (i.e., compensated cirrhosis or end-stage liver disease) at HCV diagnosis. For instance, alcohol abuse was the strongest predictor of advanced liver disease at initial HCV diagnosis in three U.S. Medicare cohorts.[40]

Until the early years of DAA availability, AUD remained a barrier to HCV treatment uptake or a reason for deferring HCV treatment initiation.[41] This was partly due to some health care providers' concerns about heavy drinkers' ability to adhere to treatment. According to current guidelines, HCV-infected persons should be considered for HCV therapy regardless of alcohol intake.[11] [42] However, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) recommends additional support for individuals who consume alcohol while on HCV treatment.[42]

Research evidence has also supported the inclusion of alcohol users in DAA treatment. For example, a U.S. study conducted among 17,487 HCV-infected patients treated with DAA within the national Veterans Affairs health care system showed high sustained virologic response rates among all groups of patients regardless of alcohol use (assessed using the AUDIT-C).[43]


#

Efficacy of Interventions to Manage AUD in People at Risk of HCV

Pharmacotherapy for AUD remains globally underused in primary care, whereas medications such as acamprosate and oral naltrexone have been associated with a reduction in returning to drinking.[44] The methodological heterogeneity across studies comparing psychosocial interventions for AUD in populations at greater risk of HCV, such as PWID, makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions concerning their overall efficacy.[45] However, some important points can be raised. First, alcohol reduction interventions may help decrease the level of consumption in HCV-infected individuals with moderate-to-high alcohol consumption.[46] Second, brief motivational interventions can help reduce the frequency of injection-related blood-borne virus risk behaviors, as shown in hazardous drinkers in one needle exchange program.[47] However, a systematic review[45] did not find sufficient evidence supporting the effectiveness of brief interventions in reducing alcohol use in people with concurrent illicit drug use and AUD. Third, psychosocial therapy and participation in self-help groups are useful for patients with AUD affected by liver cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation, even in the posttransplant period.[48] Fourth, integrating harm reduction interventions for AUD in a more global health care setting for PWID, including social and support services (e.g., housing, shelter, welfare services) and other health services (such as dental care, mental health services, sexual and reproductive health services, etc.), has the potential to improve both access to and efficacy of these interventions, especially if PWID themselves are engaged in developing the services.[49]


#

Suggested Recommendations

On the basis of this literature review, we propose the following recommendations to help reduce the impact of AUD on hepatitis C prevention and care among PWID.


#

Standardizing Alcohol Use Assessment to Facilitate Research on AUD and HCV

A variety of methods to assess alcohol consumption are used within the literature addressing the impact of AUD on HCV prevention and care, which makes it difficult to compare study results. In addition, the impact of alcohol use is often analyzed jointly with that of drug use, thus preventing the possibility to estimate the effects of each behavior independently. Furthermore, despite the common use of standard questionnaires in the literature on alcohol and HCV, a substantial proportion of published studies exploring this issue exclusively rely on post hoc measures of AUD from incomplete behavioral data (e.g., only asking participants about alcohol use during a given period of time).

An accurate measure of alcohol intake in a given setting requires a minimum knowledge of the types of alcoholic drinks regularly consumed and the ability to convert quantities into standard alcohol units. It is also paramount to guarantee the reproducibility of alcohol intake measures across various settings and populations to produce reliable comparisons.

As such, AUD impact studies require utilization of standardized measures of alcohol consumption or, at a minimum, systematic documentation of the number of alcohol units consumed. The diffusion and promotion of standard assessment tools, such as the AUDIT[50] [51] [52] and the AUDIT-C,[38] [51] [52] constitute a key step in the documentation of alcohol use.

Moreover, alcohol use should be discussed with PWID, and more generally with all individuals infected with HCV or at risk of HCV infection, in a nonjudgmental manner to minimize social desirability bias in self-reported measures. Social desirability bias may be more present in countries where issues related to the use of alcohol and psychoactive substances are specifically difficult to investigate, as both people with AUD and PWID remain hidden populations. For instance, this is still the case in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa despite a strong heterogeneity between countries due to economic factors as well as factors related to religion, ethnicity, and availability and acceptability of alcohol in society[53] ([Table 2]). In this context, the use of inexpensive and reliable point-of-care tests to cross-validate self-reported measurements of alcohol intake might improve reliability in alcohol use estimates.[54]

Table 2

Alcohol use in resource-limited settings: the case of Sub-Saharan Africa[53]

Emerging alcohol market

Widespread use of home-produced alcoholic beverages

AUD-related disease burden[a] greater than that of high-resource settings

Hidden populations including people who inject drugs and people with AUD

High abstention rates, with a strong heterogeneity between countries due to economic factors, religion, ethnicity, and availability and acceptability of alcohol in society

Abbreviation: AUD, alcohol use disorder.


a Per unit of alcohol used.



#

Developing Harm Reduction Interventions

Interventions aimed at reducing HCV transmission among PWID or other at-risk populations should target individuals who drink alcohol frequently and in high volumes as well as include strategies to reduce risky behaviors. Such harm reduction interventions are also needed to protect them from brain and liver injury. They must be adapted to the given cultural context, especially in populations for whom alcohol use is prohibited for religious or cultural reasons.

A recent review of HCV prevention/harm reduction interventions among PWID in 179 countries highlighted the need for greater investment in interventions as it showed that the coverage of these interventions (including OAT, NSP, and condom programs) remains insufficient to prevent, halt, and reverse the HCV epidemic among PWID.[16] Furthermore, specific subgroups of PWID, such as methamphetamine injectors, may be at higher risk of insufficient NSP coverage and need care tailored to their distinct needs.[55] Additionally, combining harm reduction interventions with social support interventions, such as stable housing, strengthens the effect of NSP on HCV prevention.[56]


#

Scaling Up HCV Testing

HCV testing remains largely insufficient among PWID. Expanding the use of point-of-care rapid tests in harm reduction and outreach services can greatly improve access to HCV care in this population,[15] who are still highly discriminated against through, for example, repressive laws in many countries. Testing for HCV, especially if there is a positive diagnosis, can also be an important opportunity to assess for AUD and identify those in need of care.


#

Engaging HCV At-Risk Populations in Treatment Despite Alcohol Use

Modeling studies show that increasing access to DAA treatment in at-risk populations, such as PWID, will substantially impact the prevention of HCV transmission.[10] However, HCV treatment coverage remains low in most at-risk populations, especially in eastern European countries, such as Russia.[57] Expanding access to HCV treatment even among marginalized PWID will have both public health and social benefits.[9] [58] Engaging primary care providers/general practitioners in the screening, follow-up, and treatment of HCV infection can extend access to HCV care.[59] The coordination of primary health care with addiction and HCV specialists is important to both engage and retain patients with AUD in HCV care. Evidence-based approaches of care delivery based on equity, nondiscrimination, and community engagement are needed for marginalized populations, such as PWID. Extending the use of practical tools such as service design checklists may help health policy-makers, caregivers, nongovernmental organizations, and communities to develop, update, or monitor care services for at-risk groups.[49]


#

Conclusion

To achieve the WHO goal of eliminating HCV as a public health threat, interventions must address alcohol misuse in at-risk populations, especially PWID. To adequately address AUD, policy-makers and care providers must prioritize providing more information on treatment and education to reduce alcohol-related harms, promoting an expanded range of treatment options, which incorporate brief interventions, and guaranteeing adequate case management. This spectrum of interventions should be proposed even to those still engaged in alcohol use. Furthermore, interventions to reduce AUD and prevent related harms in all individuals at risk of or living with HCV must be included in future research and policy agendas.


#

Main Concepts and Learning Points

  • Alcohol use disorder (AUD) negatively impacts prevention, access to, and continuity of care for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in at-risk populations, such as people who inject drugs (PWID).

  • Specific interventions are required to reduce AUD and prevent related harms among PWID.

  • Scaling up HCV testing and treating HCV-positive individuals despite AUD are needed to achieve micro-elimination in this key population.

  • Research studies assessing AUD must use standardized measures of alcohol use to facilitate comparisons among studies.

  • These measures must document, at a minimum, the number of alcohol units consumed in a given period of time.


#
#

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare with regard to this work.

Author Contributions

F. M. and P. C. drafted the manuscript. A. J., P. M., and J. V. L., contributed to the full manuscript and provided critical reviewing and suggestions throughout the different versions of this manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final draft for submission.



Address for correspondence

Jeffrey V. Lazarus, PhD, MIH, MA
Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona
Calle del Rosellón 132, 4th Floor, ES-08036 Barcelona
Spain   

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 August 2020 (online)

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA


Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Impact of AUD on HCV prevention and cascade of care. AUD, alcohol use disorder; HCV, hepatitis C virus; NSP, needle and syringe programs; OAT, opioid agonist therapy; PWID, people who inject drugs.