J Knee Surg 2022; 35(05): 534-538
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716372
Original Article

Comparison of Acorn and Fluted Reamers on Tibial Tunnel Outer Aperture Dimensions in ACL Reconstruction

Adam D. Gerrard
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom
,
Chris M. Jump
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom
,
Paul Sutton
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
,
Charalambos P. Charalambous
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom
3   School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if the type of reamer used in tibial tunnel creation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction influences the dimensions of the tunnel's outer aperture. Tibial tunnels were created in tibial saw bones by reaming over a guidewire using an 8 mm acorn or fluted reamer in an antegrade manner. Reaming was aimed either in line with the guidewire, or with 10-degree inferior/superior deviation in relation to the wire. The shape and size of the outer aperture of the tibial tunnel were compared between the two reamers. When using the acorn reamer, a 10-degree deviation in relation to the guidewire resulted in minimal change in outer aperture length (mean 13.6 vs. 15.6 mm, p = 0.11) and width (11.6 vs. 11.1 mm, p = 0.51). However, when using the fluted reamer, although the aperture width showed no substantial change with reamer/guidewire deviation (11.4 vs. 11.2 mm, p = 0.71), the mean length almost doubled (14.7 vs. 28.1 mm, p = 0.002). The use of a fluted reamer when reaming the tibial tunnel creates a distal aperture which is inconsistently sized, larger, and of oblong shape compared with an acorn-shaped reamer. This should be taken in consideration when using a fluted reamer for creating the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction.



Publication History

Received: 09 April 2020

Accepted: 21 July 2020

Article published online:
08 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Chechik O, Amar E, Khashan M, Lador R, Eyal G, Gold A. An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (02) 201-206
  • 2 Goble EM, Downey DJ, Wilcox TR. Positioning of the tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (06) 688-695
  • 3 Geeslin AG, Jansson KS, Wijdicks CA, Chapman MA, Fok AS, LaPrade RF. Tibial tunnel aperture irregularity after drilling with 5 reamer designs: a qualitative micro-computed tomography analysis. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (04) 825-831
  • 4 Knight JR, Condie D, Querry R, Robertson WJ. The use of a mono-fluted reamer results in decreased enlargement of the tibial tunnel when using a transtibial ACL reconstruction technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (02) 357-362
  • 5 Yabroudi MA, Björnsson H, Lynch AD. et al. Predictors of revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2016; 4 (09) 2325967116666039
  • 6 Bedi A, Maak T, Musahl V. et al. Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important?. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (02) 366-373
  • 7 Burks R, Daniel D, Losse G. The effect of continuous passive motion on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction stability. Am J Sports Med 1984; 12 (04) 323-327
  • 8 Cooper DE, Wilson TW. Clinical failure of tibial interference screw fixation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A report of two cases. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (05) 693-697
  • 9 Brand Jr J, Weiler A, Caborn DN, Brown Jr CH, Johnson DL. Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (05) 761-774
  • 10 Hill CM, An YH, Young FA. Tendon and ligament fixation to bone. In: Walsh WR. ed. Repair and Regeneration of Ligaments, Tendons, and Joint Capsule. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2006: 257-277
  • 11 Rodeo SA, Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, Hidaka C, Warren RF. Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (12) 1795-1803
  • 12 Andernord D, Björnsson H, Petzold M. et al. Surgical predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Swedish national knee ligament register on 13,102 patients. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (07) 1574-1582
  • 13 Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Stähelin AC, Bail HJ, Siepe CJ, Südkamp NP. Hamstring tendon fixation using interference screws: a biomechanical study in calf tibial bone. Arthroscopy 1998; 14 (01) 29-37
  • 14 Pena F, Grøntvedt T, Brown GA, Aune AK, Engebretsen L. Comparison of failure strength between metallic and absorbable interference screws. Influence of insertion torque, tunnel-bone block gap, bone mineral density, and interference. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (03) 329-334
  • 15 Kohn D, Rose C. Primary stability of interference screw fixation. Influence of screw diameter and insertion torque. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (03) 334-338
  • 16 Brand Jr JC, Pienkowski D, Steenlage E, Hamilton D, Johnson DL, Caborn DN. Interference screw fixation strength of a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft is directly related to bone mineral density and insertion torque. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (05) 705-710
  • 17 Selby JB, Johnson DL, Hester P, Caborn DN. Effect of screw length on bioabsorbable interference screw fixation in a tibial bone tunnel. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (05) 614-619
  • 18 Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Siepe CJ, Kolbeck SF, Südkamp NP. The influence of screw geometry on hamstring tendon interference fit fixation. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (03) 356-359
  • 19 Kopf S, Martin DE, Tashman S, Fu FH. Effect of tibial drill angles on bone tunnel aperture during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (04) 871-881