Sinonasal Symptom Outcomes following Endoscopic Anterior Cranial Base Surgery in the Pediatric Population

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic anterior cranial base (ACB) surgery on sinonasal symptoms in the pediatric population utilizing the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 questionnaire.

Design This is a retrospective review.

Setting The study was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center.

Participants Thirty-four consecutive patients, age 6 to 17 years, M:F 14:20, who underwent endoscopic ACB surgery from July 2008 to August 2019. Ten patients had baseline and a minimum of two subsequent postoperative SNOT-22 questionnaires available for analysis.

Main Outcome Measures Baseline and postoperative SNOT-22 scores were compared. The mean change from baseline sinonasal symptom scores in the pediatric and historical adult cohorts was compared.

Results The mean baseline SNOT-22 score for our 10 patient cohort was 0.46 out of 5 for each of the first 10 sinonasal-specific questions. This worsened to 1.69 at 1 month and returned to near baseline, 0.7, at 3 months postoperatively. The mean quality-of-life score improved to 0.91 at 1 month and 0.6 at 3 months postoperatively. The mean change from baseline for the following items: need to blow nose, runny nose, postnasal discharge, thick nasal discharge, wake up at night, reduced concentration, and frustrated/restless/irritable were similar to those in our historical adult cohort at 3 months postoperatively.

Conclusion Endoscopic ACB surgery in the pediatric population results in increased sinonasal symptom morbidity in the early postoperative period; however, symptoms return to near baseline by ∼3 months, and quality-of-life scores progressively improve in the postoperative period. These trends were similar to those seen in our historic adult cohort.

Keywords

skull base - pediatrics - outcomes

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 23. August 2020

Angenommen: 24. Februar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Mai 2021

• References

• 1 Ali ZS, Lang S-S, Kamat AR. et al. Suprasellar pediatric craniopharyngioma resection via endonasal endoscopic approach. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29 (11) 2065-2070
• 2 Kassam A, Thomas AJ, Snyderman C. et al. Fully endoscopic expanded endonasal approach treating skull base lesions in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (2, Suppl): 75-86
• 3 Kuan EC, Kaufman AC, Lerner D. et al. Lack of sphenoid pneumatization does not affect endoscopic endonasal pediatric skull base surgery outcomes. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (04) 832-836
• 4 Chivukula S, Koutourousiou M, Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Tyler-Kabara EC. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 11 (03) 227-241
• 5 Taşkapılıoğlu MÖ, Yilmazlar S, Eren E, Tarım O, Güler TM. Transnasal transsphenoidal surgical method in pediatric pituitary adenomas. Pediatr Neurosurg 2015; 50 (03) 128-132
• 6 Yamada S, Fukuhara N, Yamaguchi-Okada M. et al. Therapeutic outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery in pediatric patients with craniopharyngiomas: a single-center study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 21 (06) 549-562
• 7 Boghani Z, Husain Q, Kanumuri VV. et al. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: a systematic review and comparison of endoscopic, endoscopic-assisted, and open resection in 1047 cases. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (04) 859-869
• 8 Shenouda K, Yuhan BT, Mir A. et al. Endoscopic resection of pediatric skull base tumors: an evidence-based review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80 (05) 527-539
• 9 Koumas C, Laibangyang A, Barron SL, Mittler MA, Schneider SJ, Rodgers SD. Outcomes following endoscopic endonasal resection of sellar and supresellar lesions in pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst 2019; 35 (11) 2099-2105
• 10 Alalade AF, Ogando-Rivas E, Boatey J. et al. Suprasellar and recurrent pediatric craniopharyngiomas: expanding indications for the extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 21 (01) 72-80
• 11 LoPresti MA, Sellin JN, DeMonte F. Developmental considerations in pediatric skull base surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (01) 3-12
• 12 Morley AD, Sharp HR. A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?. Clin Otolaryngol 2006; 31 (02) 103-109
• 13 Thompson CF, Suh JD, Liu Y, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Modifications to the endoscopic approach for anterior skull base lesions improve postoperative sinonasal symptoms. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (01) 65-72
• 14 Kim JS, Kwon SH. Recurrence of sinonasal inverted papilloma following surgical approach: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (01) 52-58
• 15 Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol 2009; 34 (05) 447-454
• 16 Thamboo A, Santos RCD, Naidoo L, Rahmanian R, Chilvers MA, Chadha NK. Use of the SNOT-22 and UPSIT to appropriately select pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis who should be referred to an otolaryngologist: cross-sectional study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140 (10) 934-939
• 17 Kay DJ, Rosenfeld RM. Quality of life for children with persistent sinonasal symptoms. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128 (01) 17-26