J Knee Surg 2023; 36(02): 167-172
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731350
Original Article

Should We Suture Arthroscopic Portals? Effects on Intra-articular Fluid Retention

Serdar Sargin
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Turkey
,
Aziz Atik
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Turkey
,
Ahmet Aslan
2   Departmant of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Knee arthroscopy is one of the most common surgical procedures in orthopaedics and especially in sports medicine. Portal problems and effusion after knee arthroscopy have been reported. The fluid retention within the joint in knee arthroscopy can affect clinical outcomes, but there is no consensus on portal management. The studies of portal management in knee arthroscopy have mainly addressed wound healing and cosmetic problems. There is insufficient information in the literature about whether the irrigation fluid used in this effusion contributes to the process. This study investigates whether arthroscopic irrigation fluid is retained in the joint and whether portal-closure management has an effect on effusion. In this randomized, prospective study, 91 patients (46 [50.5%] sutured-portal group and 45 [49.5%] open-portal group) were included. Suprapatellar knee-diameter measurement and the number of times the dressing was changed were used to assess intra-articular fluid collection. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Society score were used to evaluate knee problems. All portal wounds in both groups healed without any problems. Superficial or deep infection was not observed in either group. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS score, Oxford knee scores, and Knee Society scores between groups. Although there was a decrease in the knee diameter of both groups between the early postoperative period and first postoperative day, a statistically significant difference in knee diameter was found, especially in the open-portal group. There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of the number of dressings used in the first 24 hours after surgery. Leaving portals open may be effective in preventing intra-articular fluid retention. We thus advise leaving the arthroscopy portals open with just a simple dressing for selected patients.



Publication History

Received: 30 May 2020

Accepted: 01 May 2021

Article published online:
29 June 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Small NC. Complications in arthroscopic surgery of the knee and shoulder. Orthopedics 1993; 16 (09) 985-988
  • 2 Bamford DJ, Paul AS, Noble J, Davies DR. Avoidable complications of arthroscopic surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1993; 38 (02) 92-95
  • 3 Allum R. Complications of arthroscopy of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (07) 937-945
  • 4 Deshmukh NV, Hui A. Persistent synovial fistula after arthroscopy in carbon synovitis. ANZ J Surg 2001; 71 (02) 128-129
  • 5 Proffer DS, Drez Jr D, Daus GP. Synovial fistula of the knee: a complication of arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 1991; 7 (01) 98-100
  • 6 Raunest J, Löhnert J. [Intra- and postoperative complications of arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint] (in German). Orthopade 1990; 19 (02) 117-123
  • 7 Sherman OH, Fox JM, Snyder SJ. et al. Arthroscopy--“no-problem surgery”. An analysis of complications in two thousand six hundred and forty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (02) 256-265
  • 8 Hiranaka T, Tanaka T, Fujishiro T. et al. A subcutaneous arthroscopic portal closure technique without thread exposure. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020; 30 (02) 383-385
  • 9 Tischer TS, Oye S, Lenz R. et al. Impact of compression stockings on leg swelling after arthroscopy - a prospective randomised pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20 (01) 161
  • 10 Patil KS, Somayaji HM, Nandi SS, Daultani D, Ithli M. Evaluation of portal site healing with closure and without closure after arthroscopic procedure-a randomized prospective study. Int J Curr Res Rev 2013; 5: 36-43
  • 11 Gristina AG, Price JL, Hobgood CD, Webb LX, Costerton JW. Bacterial colonization of percutaneous sutures. Surgery 1985; 98 (01) 12-19
  • 12 Acar N, Er A, Erduran M. The assessment of portal-tract healing after knee arthroscopy. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2017; 51 (05) 372-376
  • 13 Arciero RA, Little JS, Liebenberg SP, Parr TJ. Irrigating solutions used in arthroscopy and their effect on articular cartilage. An in vivo study. Orthopedics 1986; 9 (11) 1511-1515
  • 14 Strobel MJ. Knee joint –general part. In: Strobel MJ. ed. Manual of Arthroscopic Surgery. 3rd ed.. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009: 73
  • 15 Maffulli N, Pintore E, Petricciuolo F. Arthroscopy wounds: to suture or not to suture. Acta Orthop Belg 1991; 57 (02) 154-156
  • 16 Sikand M, Murtaza A, Desai VV. Healing of arthroscopic portals: a randomised trial comparing three methods of portal closure. Acta Orthop Belg 2006; 72 (05) 583-586
  • 17 Hussein R, Southgate GW. Management of knee arthroscopy portals. Knee 2001; 8 (04) 329-331
  • 18 Bhattacharyya M, Bradley H. Intraoperative handling and wound healing of arthroscopic portal wounds: a clinical study comparing nylon suture with wound closure strips. J Perioper Pract 2008; 18 (05) 194-196 , 198
  • 19 Yiannakopoulos CK. Diagnosis and treatment of postarthroscopic synovial knee fistulae: a report of four cases and review of the literature. J Knee Surg 2007; 20 (01) 34-38
  • 20 Wang J, Xu W, Lv J. Is it better to routinely use tourniquet for knee arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg 2020; 33 (09) 866-874
  • 21 Jensen J, Hicks RW, Labovitz J. Understanding and optimizing tourniquet use during extremity surgery. AORN J 2019; 109 (02) 171-182