Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2021; 34(06): 419-426
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735552
Clinical Communication

Repair of Fractures of the Lateral Aspect of the Humeral Condyle in Skeletally Mature Dogs with Locking and Non-Locking Plates

Matthew K. Eayrs 
1   Anderson Moores Veterinary Specialists, Winchester, United Kingdom
,
Vincent Guerin
2   Davies Veterinary Specialists, Higham Gobion, United Kingdom
,
James Grierson
1   Anderson Moores Veterinary Specialists, Winchester, United Kingdom
,
Andrew P. Moores 
1   Anderson Moores Veterinary Specialists, Winchester, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to report the functional outcome and complications following transcondylar screw and epicondylar plate fixation of skeletally mature dogs with fractures of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle using a string of pearls, limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) or locking compression plate (LCP).

Study Design This study was a retrospective review of clinical records, radiographic images and canine brief pain inventory evaluation with a supplementary non-validated questionnaire.

Results Thirty-one fractures in 29 dogs were included. The majority of dogs were Spaniels (23/29). Thirty fractures had evidence of humeral intracondylar fissure. Sixteen fractures had string of pearls, eight LCP and seven LC-DCP. There were two minor complications and three major complications. Perioperative (median: 6 weeks, range: 6–12) outcome was considered fully functional for 24 fractures and acceptable for 6 fractures. One dog had an unacceptable outcome due to the failure of an LCP that healed following revision surgery. Fractures with radiographic follow-up had a persistent visible intracondylar fracture line in 20/26. Twenty-six of twenty-seven owners perceived an excellent outcome (median: 135 weeks, range: 25–246).

Conclusion Repair of fractures of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle with a transcondylar screw and epicondylar plate has a good perioperative, mid- and long-term outcome with 10% major complication rate, despite incomplete or non-union of the intracondylar fracture in 20/26 elbows.

Keywords

humeral - condylar - fracture - dog - plate

Note

Preliminary data from this study was presented as an abstract at the 2020 autumn meeting of the British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association.


Authors' Contributions

M.K.E. contributed to conception of study, study design acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation. V.G. contributed to conception of study, study design and data analysis and interpretation. A.P.M. and J.M. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 10 December 2020

Accepted: 23 July 2021

Article published online:
27 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Denny HR. Condylar fractures of the humerus in the dog; a review of 133 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1983; 24 (04) 185-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sumner-Smith G. Observations on epiphyseal fusion of the canine appendicular skeleton. J Small Anim Pract 1966; 7 (04) 303-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Farrell M, Trevail T, Marshall W, Yeadon R, Carmichael S. Computed tomographic documentation of the natural progression of humeral intracondylar fissure in a cocker spaniel. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (08) 966-971
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung DJ, Ferris KK, Berry CM. Incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle in spaniels. Vet Surg 1994; 23 (06) 475-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Moores AP, Tivers MS, Grierson J. Clinical assessment of a shaft screw for stabilization of the humeral condyle in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27 (03) 179-185
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cole G, Beale B. Minimally invasive osteosynthesis techniques for articular fractures. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2020; 50 (01) 213-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Perry KL, Bruce M, Woods S, Davies C, Heaps LA, Arthurs GI. Effect of fixation method on postoperative complication rates after surgical stabilization of lateral humeral condylar fractures in dogs. Vet Surg 2015; 44 (02) 246-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Morgan ODE, Reetz JA, Brown DC, Tucker SM, Mayhew PD. Complication rate, outcome, and risk factors associated with surgical repair of fractures of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (05) 400-405
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Moores A. Humeral condylar fractures and incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle in dogs. In Pract 2006; 28 (07) 391-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cook JL, Tomlinson JL, Reed AL. Fluoroscopically guided closed reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the lateral portion of the humeral condyle: prospective clinical study of the technique and results in ten dogs. Vet Surg 1999; 28 (05) 315-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ness MG. Repair of Y-T humeral fractures in the dog using paired 'String of Pearls' locking plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (06) 492-497
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Moffatt F, Kulendra E, Meeson RL. Repair of Y-T humeral condyle fractures with locking compression plate fixation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (05) 401-407
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 García J, Yeadon R, Solano MA. Bilateral locking compression plate and transcondylar screw fixation for stabilization of canine bicondylar humeral fractures. Vet Surg 2020; 49 (06) 1183-1194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Johnson KA. Approach to the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle and epicondyle in the dog. In: Piermattei's Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 5th edition.. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2014: 202-207
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Quinn MM, Keuler NS, Lu Y, Faria MLE, Muir P, Markel MD. Evaluation of agreement between numerical rating scales, visual analogue scoring scales, and force plate gait analysis in dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (04) 360-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG. et al. Proposed definitions and criteria for reporting time frame, outcome, and complications for clinical orthopedic studies in veterinary medicine. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (08) 905-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Brown DC, Boston RC, Coyne JC, Farrar JT. Development and psychometric testing of an instrument designed to measure chronic pain in dogs with osteoarthritis. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68 (06) 631-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Cockett PA, Jones DGC. The repair of humeral condylar fractures in the dog: a review of seventy-nine cases. J Small Anim Pract 1985; 26 (09) 493-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sanchez Villamil C, Phillips ASJ, Pegram CL, O'Neill DG, Meeson RL. Impact of breed on canine humeral condylar fracture configuration, surgical management, and outcome. Vet Surg 2020; 49 (04) 639-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cariou M, Sgro G. French Bulldogs Predisposition to Unicondylar Humeral Fractures [Internet]. Presented at: WSAVA/FECAVA/BSAVA World Congress 2012. [cited 2020 May 2]. Accessed Aug 17, 2021 at: https://www.vin.com/apputil/content/defaultadv1.aspx?id=5328455&pid=11349&print=1
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Smith MAJ, Jenkins G, Dean BL, O'Neill TM, Macdonald NJ. Effect of breed as a risk factor for humeral condylar fracture in skeletally immature dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1983; 2020: 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (08) 488-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B63-B76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Field MR, Butler R, Wills RW, Maxwell WM. Retrospective evaluation of perioperative and short term clinical outcomes in appendicular long bone skeleton fractures repaired via the string of pearls (SOP) locking plate system. BMC Vet Res 2018; 14 (01) 386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Boero Baroncelli A, Reif U, Bignardi C, Peirone B. Effect of screw insertion torque on push-out and cantilever bending properties of five different angle-stable systems. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (03) 308-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Edgerton BC, An K-N, Morrey BF. Torsional strength reduction due to cortical defects in bone. J Orthop Res 1990; 8 (06) 851-855
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Filipowicz D, Lanz O, McLaughlin R, Elder S, Werre S. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (04) 270-277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Moores AP. Humeral intracondylar fissure in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2021; 51 (02) 421-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Fitzpatrick N, Smith TJ, O'Riordan J, Yeadon R. Treatment of incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle with autogenous bone grafting techniques. Vet Surg 2009; 38 (02) 173-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Walton MB, Crystal E, Morrison S. et al. A humeral intracondylar repair system for the management of humeral intracondylar fissure and humeral condylar fracture. J Small Anim Pract 2020; 61 (12) 757-765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Klaue K. The dynamic compression unit (DCU) for stable internal fixation of bone fractures. [dissertation]. Perren S. editor. University of Basel; 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Conzemius MG, Evans RB. Caregiver placebo effect for dogs with lameness from osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 241 (10) 1314-1319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Moores AP, Agthe P, Schaafsma IA. Prevalence of incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle and other abnormalities of the elbow in English Springer Spaniels. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25 (03) 211-216
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Carrera I, Hammond GJC, Sullivan M. Computed tomographic features of incomplete ossification of the canine humeral condyle. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (03) 226-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar