Keywords
intestinal volvulus - sigmoid - laparoscopy
Introduction
Volvulus is a condition in which the colon wraps around itself and its own mesentery,
causing a closed loop obstruction. It accounts for up to between 50 and 80% of intestinal
obstructions.[1]
[2] The most common sites for volvulus are the sigmoid colon and the cecum.[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
A flexible endoscopic detorsion can eliminate the volvulus by going forward through
the compromised segment of the colon, restoring the passage of luminal content, and
ensuring perfusion of the sigmoid colon.[7] Flexible endoscopic detorsion is successful in up to between 75 and 90% of hemodynamically
stable patients in absence of ischemic lesions, necrosis, or colon perforation.[7]
After the endoscopic detorsion, it is feasible to perform an elective sigmoidectomy
with colorectal anastomosis instead of a Hartmann procedure in emergency surgery,
achieving lower rates of postoperative complications, without observing a direct impact
on mortality.[8]
The role of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal procedures continues growing, but there
are only a few references in the published literature about the laparoscopic management
of sigmoid volvulus. Various articles have established that the laparoscopic approach
is an adequate alternative in selected cases by surgeons competent with this technique.[9]
[10] Recent studies have determined better outcomes when preserving the superior rectal
artery (SRA) in patients with sigmoid resection, which is a more complex procedure
when performed through laparoscopic surgery.
We present the surgical management of a patient with sigmoid volvulus performing an
endoscopic colonic decompression and elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with colorectal
anastomosis, preserving the SRA.
Clinical Case
A 64-year-old female patient presented to the emergency room with abdominal pain,
distension, and constipation of 24 hours of evolution. She had a personal history
of type 2 diabetes mellitus of 30 years of evolution and hysterectomy in 2016. Physical
examination revealed a distended abdomen, with pain at palpation over the left hemiabdomen,
tympanic at percussion with no evidence of peritoneal irritation. Blood tests showed
no systemic inflammatory response, leucocytes 7,200 µL, C-reactive protein 1 mg/L,
and lactate 1.5 mmol/L. The abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed dilated large
bowel loops, the classic image of coffee bean sign ([Fig. 1A]), and a whirl pattern in the sigmoid mesentery ([Fig. 1B]). After confirmation of the diagnosis and initial management with fluid and antibiotics,
a colonoscopy to decompress the volvulus was performed. During the procedure, an increased
compliance and elasticity was observed, as well as an altered haustra distribution
and vascular pattern, increased intestinal caliber, and generalized edema, with no
evidence of ischemia or perforation. The colonoscope was passed toward the descending
and transverse colon and up to the hepatic flexure, with subsequent successful colonic
decompression ([Fig. 2]). Forty-eight hours after the colonoscopy, a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy was performed.
Under direct vision, redundant sigmoid was observed. The sacral promontory was identified
to start the peritoneum dissection 2 cm above it, recognizing the inferior mesenteric
artery and the SRA, delimiting its path to its origin for subsequent preservation
([Fig. 3]). After we finished the dissection of the toldt fascia, we began the resection of
the mesorectum. A linear laparoscopic stapler was used for its resection. A wide incision
was made in the umbilical region for placement of a wound protector retractor (Alexis®
C8301 Applied Medical, USA) and exteriorization of the surgical piece with its resection
on viable tissue ([Fig. 4]). End-to-end colorectal anastomosis was performed with a circular stapler ([Fig. 5]). At the end, a pneumatic test and flexible intraoperative rectosigmoidoscopy were
performed, identifying a complete anastomosis, with no evidence of leakage or bleeding.
The surgical piece was sent to pathology, which reported mild chronic colitis, with
no data of malignancy in any segment, both discoid specimens were intact and uniform.
Surgery was terminated without complications, with minimal bleeding of 50 cc at a
registered time of 150 minutes. The patient presented adequate postoperative evolution,
starting to eat on the 1st postoperative day, with adequate tolerance, gas channeling, and consistent evacuations
present, and was discharged on the 4th postoperative day.
Fig. 1 Abdominal computed tomography showing the characteristic images of volvulus: coffee
bean sign (left) and whirl pattern in the sigmoid mesentery (right).
Fig. 2 Colonic decompression by flexible rectosigmoidoscopy; we observe altered haustra
distribution and vascular pattern, without signs of ischemic zones.
Fig. 3 Identification of the superior rectal artery after dissection of peritoneum, delimitating
the path of the superior rectal artery toward its origin.
Fig. 4 Exteriorization of the surgical piece. Redundant sigmoid is observed.
Fig. 5 Colorectal anastomosis with circular stapler.
Discussion
Elective laparoscopic surgery after adequate endoscopic decompression for sigmoid
volvulus has made this type of procedure feasible and safe in patients with hemodynamic
stability, especially when performed by a trained team with surgical experience in
laparoscopic procedures. After endoscopic decompression, the time for the colectomy
remains a matter of discussion. Most studies suggest operating on between the 3rd and 5th day after the decompression. There are few publications regarding the benefits of
early versus late colectomy. Some benefits of making the colectomy earlier include
decreased deconditioning, malnutrition, and length of stay. On the other hand, a late
colectomy is related to decreased bowel wall edema and, possibly, with an increased
likelihood of an anastomosis.[11]
Preservation of the SRA is associated with a favorable outcome in patients undergoing
laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease. Maximilian Sohn et al.[12] reported lower data of anastomotic leakage in patients with preservation of the
SRA compared with patients in whom it has been resected. (1.9 versus 7%; p = 0.04). Borchert et al.[13] conducted a study in which they compared patients with preservation of the SRA with
patients who had it resected, observing that patients with preservation of the SRA
had a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage (1 versus 8 patients; p = 0.038). The incidence of intraoperative bleeding, wound dehiscence, and days of
hospital stay was higher in patients in whom the SRA was resected (p < 0.03; p < 0.04; p = 0.05). Obesity was an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage in these
patients (p < 0.04).
There are few articles in the literature with reference to the preservation of the
SRA in patients with sigmoidectomy secondary to sigmoid volvulus. The published literature
refers only to patients with diverticular disease in this type of procedure. The report
of the present case and the published literature on the preservation of the SRA have
shown this to be a feasible procedure, without increasing the operative time and with
a reduction in the risks of postoperative complications in patients selected for laparoscopic
sigmoid resection.