Download PDF
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2016; 48(01): 10-17
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-100460
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical Presentation, Surgical Treatment, and Outcome in Radial Polydactyly

Klinisches Erscheinungsbild, chirurgische Behandlung und Ergebnisse bei radialer Polydaktylie
R. R. Dijkman
1   Erasmus MC, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, Netherlands
,
C. A. van Nieuwenhoven
1   Erasmus MC, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, Netherlands
,
S. E. R. Hovius
1   Erasmus MC, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, Netherlands
,
W. Hülsemann
2   Katholisches Kinderkrankenhaus Wilhelmstift, Handchirurgie, Hamburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 25 September 2015

accepted 04 January 2016

Publication Date:
19 February 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Radial polydactyly or ‘thumb duplication’ is the most common congenital upper limb anomaly (‘CULA’) affecting the thumb. The clinical presentation is highly diverse, ranging from an extra thumb floating on a skin bridge to complicated thumb triplications with triphalangeal, deviating, and hypoplastic components. Radial polydactyly can be classified into one of 7 osseous presentations using the Wassel classification, with type IV (45%), type II (20%), and type VII (15%) occurring most frequently. When faced with a radial polydactyly case, hand surgeons specialised in congenital anomalies must weigh the preoperative functional potential and degree of hypoplasia of both thumbs in order to decide whether to resect one thumb and reconstruct the other (‘resection and reconstruction’), excise a central part of both thumbs and unite the lateral tissues into one thumb (‘the Bilhaut procedure’), transfer the better-developed distal tissues of one thumb onto the better-developed proximal tissues of the other (‘on-top plasty’), or discard both severely hypoplastic thumbs and pollicise the index finger. Mere excision of the hypoplastic thumb is rarely indicated since it often requires subsequent revision surgery. Even after being treated by experienced surgeons, about 15% of patients with polydactyly will need additional procedures to correct residual and/or new problems such as deviation from the longitudinal axis and joint instability. Nevertheless, radial polydactyly patients usually achieve unimpaired everyday hand function postoperatively.

Zusammenfassung

Die radiale Polydaktylie, auch Doppeldaumen genannt, ist die häufigste angeborene den Daumen betreffende Fehlbildung der oberen Extremität. Das klinische Erscheinungsbild weist eine große Variationsbreite auf, von einem nur an einer dünnen Hautbrücke flottierenden Daumenanhängsel bis hin zum Dreifach-Daumen mit dreigliedrigen, deviierenden und hypoplastischen Anteilen. Die Wassel-Klassifikation, bei der die radiale Polydaktylie anhand der knöchernen Situation eingeteilt wird, unterscheidet 7 Typen, wobei der Typ IV mit 45%, der Typ II mit 20% und der Typ VII mit 15% am häufigsten vorkommen. Bei der Planung der chirurgischen Behandlung der radialen Polydaktylie gilt es für den mit angeborenen Fehlbildungen vertrauten Handchirurgen abzuwägen, ob einer der beiden Daumen und ggf. welcher ein größeres funktionelles Potenzial hat bzw. welcher weniger gut ausgebildet ist. In Betracht kommen die Resektion des einen und Rekonstruktion des anderen Daumens, die Resektion der einander zugewandten „zentralen“ Anteile beider Daumen mit anschließendem Zusammenfügen der beiden äußeren Anteile zu einem Daumen (Bilhaut-Operation), die Transposition des besser entwickelten distalen Anteils des einen auf den besser entwickelten proximalen Anteils des anderen Daumens (on-top-plasty) und die Entfernung beider ausgeprägt hypoplastischer Daumen mit anschließender Pollizisation des Zeigefingers. Das bloße „Abschneiden“ ist selten indiziert, da es oft spätere Revisionsoperationen nötig macht. Selbst in der Hand des Erfahrenen bedürfen 15% der Patienten mit einer radialen Polydaktylie weiterer Eingriffe zur Behandlung verbliebener und/oder neu aufgetretener Probleme, z. B. bei Achsabweichungen oder Gelenkinstabilitäten. Dennoch erlangen Patienten mit einer radialen Polydaktylie in der Regel eine für den Alltagsgebrauch uneingeschränkte Handfunktion.

Key words

thumb duplication - Bilhaut procedure - radial polydactyly

Schlüsselwörter

Doppeldaumen - Bilhaut-Operation - Radiale Polydaktylie
 

  • References

  • 1 Ekblom AG, Laurell T, Arner M. Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in 562 children born in 1997 to 2007: a total population study from stockholm, sweden. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 1742-1754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wassel HD. The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb: A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1969; 64: 175-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lamb DW, Wynne-Davies R, Soto L. An estimate of the population frequency of congenital malformations of the upper limb. J Hand Surg Am 1982; 7: 557-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Leung PC, Chan KM, Cheng JC. Congenital anomalies of the upper limb among the Chinese population in Hong Kong. J Hand Surg Am 1982; 7: 563-565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hung L, Cheng JC, Bundoc R et al. Thumb duplication at the metacarpophalangeal joint: Management and a new classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 323: 31-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cheng JC, Chow SK, Leung PC. Classification of 578 cases of congenital upper limb anomalies with the IFSSH system–a 10 years’ experience. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12: 1055-1060
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Qazi Q, Kassner EG. Triphalangeal thumb. J Med Genet 1988; 25: 505-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Biesecker LG. The Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008; 3: 10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Watt AJ, Chung KC. Duplication. Hand Clin 2009; 25: 215-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM® . McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine. Johns Hopkins University; Baltimore, MD: 2015. World Wide Web URL http://omim.org/
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Bamshad M, Watkins WS, Dixon ME et al. Reconstructing the history of human limb development: lessons from birth defects. Pediatr Res 1999; 45: 291-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Riddle RD, Tabin C. How limbs develop. Sci Am 1999; 280: 74-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Riddle RD, Ensini M, Nelson C et al. Induction of the LIM homeobox gene Lmx1 by WNT7a establishes dorsoventral pattern in the vertebrate limb. Cell 1995; 83: 631-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E et al. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 1993; 75: 1401-1416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Radhakrishna U, Bornholdt D, Scott HS et al. The phenotypic spectrum of GLI3 morphopathies includes autosomal dominant preaxial polydactyly type-IV and postaxial polydactyly type-A/B; No phenotype prediction from the position of GLI3 mutations. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 65: 645-655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Debeer P, Peeters H, Driess S et al. Variable phenotype in Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome: clinical and radiological findings in 4 independent families and 3 sporadic cases with identified GLI3 mutations. Am J Med Genet 2003; 120A: 49-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lettice LA, Hill RE. Preaxial polydactyly: a model for defective long-range regulation in congenital abnormalities. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2005; 15: 294-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Swanson AB, Brown KS. Hereditary triphalangeal thumb. J Hered 1962; 53: 259-265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Farooq M, Troelsen JT, Boyd M et al. Preaxial polydactyly/triphalangeal thumb is associated with changed transcription factor-binding affinity in a family with a novel point mutation in the long-range cis-regulatory element ZRS. Eur J Hum Genet 2010; 18: 733-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wieczorek D, Pawlik B, Li Y et al. A specific mutation in the distant sonic hedgehog (SHH) cis-regulator (ZRS) causes Werner mesomelic syndrome (WMS) while complete ZRS duplications underlie Haas type polysyndactyly and preaxial polydactyly (PPD) with or without triphalangeal thumb. Hum Mutat 2010; 31: 81-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Klopocki E, Ott CE, Benatar N et al. A microduplication of the long range SHH limb regulator (ZRS) is associated with triphalangeal thumb-polysyndactyly syndrome. J Med Genet 2008; 45: 370-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sun M, Ma F, Zeng X et al. Triphalangeal thumb-polysyndactyly syndrome and syndactyly type IV are caused by genomic duplications involving the long range, limb-specific SHH enhancer. J Med Genet 2008; 45: 589-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Oberg KC, Greer LF, Naruse T. Embryology of the upper limb: the molecular orchestration of morphogenesis. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2004; 36: 98-107
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Swanson AB. A classification for congenital malformations of the hand. Acad Med Bull New Jersey 1964; 10: 166-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kay H. A proposed international terminology for the classification of congenital limb deficiencies. Orthotics Prosthetics 1974; 28: 33-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Samson P, Salazard B, Magalon G. The “Bilhaut-Cloquet” technique for treatment of thumb duplication. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2004; 36: 141-145
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Patel AU, Tonkin MA, Smith BJ et al. Factors affecting surgical results of Wassel type IV thumb duplications. J Hand Surg Eur 2014; 39: 934-943
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Al-Qattan MM. The distribution of the types of thumb polydactyly in a Middle Eastern population: A study of 228 hands. J Hand Surg Eur 2010; 35B: 182-187
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Islam S, Oka I, Fujita S. Anatomical study of preaxial polydactyly in 158 hands. Tohoku J Exp Med 1992; 168: 459-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Cheng JC, Chan KM, Ma GF et al. Polydactyly of the thumb: A surgical plan based on ninety five cases. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 155-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Zuidam JM, Selles RW, Ananta M et al. A classification system of radial polydactyly: Inclusion of triphalangeal thumb and triplication. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33: 373-377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Buck-Gramcko D, Behrens P. Classification of polydactyly of the hand and foot. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1989; 21: 195-204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Upton J, Shoen S. Triphalangeal Thumb. In: Gupta A, Kay SP, Scheker LR. Hrsg. The Growing Hand, Diagnosis and Management of the Upper Extremity in Children. 1st Aufl London: Mosby; 2000: 255-268
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Tonkin MA. Thumb duplication: Concepts and techniques. Clin Orthop Surg 2012; 4: 1-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kelikian H, Doumanian A. Congenital anomalies of the hand, part I. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957; 39: 1002-1019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Miura T. Duplicated thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 470-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Townsend DJ, Lipp Jr EB, Chun K et al. Thumb duplication, 66 years’ experience: A review of surgical complications. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19: 973-976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Mills JK, Ezaki M, Oishi SN. Ulnar polydactyly: long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of surgical clip application in the newborn. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2014; 53: 470-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bilhaut M. Guerison d’un pouce bifide par un nouveau procede operatoire. Congrés Francais de Chirurgie 1889
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Hartrampf CR, Vasconez LO, Mathes S. Construction of one good thumb from both parts of a congenitally bifid thumb. Plastic Rekonstr Surg 1974; 54: 148-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Tonkin MA, Bulstrode NW. The Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure for Wassel types III, IV and VII thumb duplication. J Hand Surg Eur 2007; 32E: 684-693
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Abid A, Accadbled F, Knorr G et al. Type IV-D thumb duplication: A new reconstruction method. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96: 521-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Naasan A, Page RE. Duplication of the thumb: A 20-year retrospective review. J Hand Surg Br 1994; 19: 355-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Andrew JG, Sykes PJ. Duplicate thumbs: A survey of results in twenty patients. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13: 50-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Tada K, Yonenobu K, Tsuyuguchi Y et al. Duplication of the thumb. A retrospective review of two hundred and thirty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65: 584-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ogino T, Ishii S, Takahata S et al. Long-term results of surgical treatment of thumb polydactyly. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21: 478-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Horii E, Nakamura R, Sakuma M et al. Duplicated thumb bifurcation at the metacarpophalangeal joint level: Factors affecting surgical outcome. J Hand Surg Am 1997; 22: 671-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ogino T, Ishii S, Minami M. Radially deviated type of thumb polydactyly. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13: 315-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Dobyns JH, Lipscomb PR, Cooney WP. Management of thumb duplication. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 195: 26-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Baek GH, Gong HS, Chung MS et al. Modified Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure for Wassel type-II and III polydactyly of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 534-541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar