A Simple Tool to Benchmark Reactivity in Asymmetric Catalysis

Dedicated to the memory of our dear friend and colleague Keith Fagnou

Abstract

Herein, we report a simple and noninvasive experimental protocol in which a series of relative reaction rates may be obtained by way of single competition experiments. This approach permits a quantitative comparison of any given number of chiral catalysts relative to a ‘benchmarking’ chiral catalyst – a particularly useful tool since catalyst design and selection have remained largely dependent on chemical intuition. We apply this benchmarking approach towards an asymmetric N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalyzed intramolecular Stetter reaction as a proof-of-concept study. In doing so, we demonstrate a rapid method to assess the complex interplay between catalyst reactivity and stereoelectronic effects – an analytical approach that has heretofore not been attempted for NHCs. To showcase the generality of this method, we apply it to an enantioselective Rh(I)-catalyzed [2+2+2] cycloaddition of alkenyl isocyanates and aryl alkynes for a series of chiral phosphoramidite ligands. The results described herein demonstrate that this inexpensive and easily adoptable protocol can reveal complex yet subtle steric and stereoelectronic effects of vastly different chiral catalyst structures, which can further aid with catalyst development and selection for a clearly defined application.

Key words

relative rates - kinetics - N-heterocyclic carbenes - Rh(I) cycloaddition

Publication History

Received: 15 February 2024

Accepted after revision: 06 March 2024

Article published online:
21 March 2024

• References and Notes

• 1 Zahrt AF, Athavale SV, Denmark SE. Chem. Rev. 2020; 120: 1620

For select instances where kinetics played a significant role in mechanism elucidation, see:
• 2a Shekhar S, Ryberg P, Hartwig JF, Mathew JS, Blackmond DG, Strieter ER, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 3584
• 2b Zuend SJ, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 15358
• 2c Hein JE, Armstrong A, Blackmond DG. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 4300

For selected reviews on the role of kinetics in industry, see:
• 3a Bos AN. R, Lefferts L, Marin GB, Steijns MH. G. M. Appl. Catal., A 1997; 160: 185
• 3b Berger RJ, Stitt EH, Marin GB, Kapteijn F, Moulijn JA. CATTECH 2001; 5: 36 ; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1011928218694
• 4 Blackmond DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 10852
• 5 Blackmond DG, Rosner T, Pfaltz A. Org. Process Res. Dev. 1999; 3: 275
• 6 Rein AJ, Donahue SM, Pavlosky MA. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2000; 3: 734
• 7 Denmark SE, Williams BJ, Eklov BM, Pham SM, Beutner GL. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 5558
• 8 DiRocco DA, Noey EL, Houk KN, Rovis T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 2391
• 9 Flanigan DM, Romanov-Michailidis F, White NA, Rovis T. Chem. Rev. 2015; 115: 9307
• 10a Kerr MS, Read de Alaniz J, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 10298
• 10b Kerr MS, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 8876
• 11a Liu Q, Perreault S, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 14066
• 11b Liu Q, Rovis T. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 2856
• 11c For a review of early work on the Stetter, see: Read de Alaniz J, Rovis T. Synlett 2009; 189
• 12a White NA, DiRocco D, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 8504
• 12b Lakshmi KC. S, Paul RR, Suresh E, Nair V. Synlett 2014; 25: 853
• 12c For a review of early work on homoenolate-type pathways, see: Menon RS, Biju AT, Nair V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015; 44: 5040
• 13a White NA, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 14674
• 13b White NA, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 10112
• 13c For a general review on oxidative pathways, see: De Sarkar S, Biswas A, Samanta RC, Studer A. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 4664

In this regard, over 50 unique structures are known for triazolium precatalysts, alone (see reference 9). For selected papers dedicated to the synthesis of unique structures, see:
• 14a Brand JP, Siles JI. O, Waser J. Synlett 2010; 881
• 14b Rong ZQ, Li Y, Yang GQ, You S.-L. Synlett 2011; 1033
• 14c Rafínśki Z, Kozakiewicz A, Rafinśka K. ACS Catal. 2014; 4: 1404
• 14d Ozboya KE, Rovis T. Synlett 2014; 25: 2665
• 15a Rovis T. Chem. Lett. 2008; 37: 2
• 15b Mahatthananchai J, Bode JW. Chem. Sci. 2012; 3: 192
• 15c Collett CJ, Massey RS, Maguire OR, Batsanov AS, O’Donoghue AC, Smith AD. Chem. Sci. 2013; 4: 1514
• 15d Massey RS, Collett CJ, Lindsay AG, Smith AD, O’Donoghue AC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 20421
• 15e Niu Y, Wang N, Muñoz A, Xu J, Zeng H, Rovis T, Lee JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 14917
• 16 Recently, a study that combines modifications of NHCs in combination with machine-learning techniques in order to study NHC structural effects appeared, see: Ghayalan V, Gadekar SC, Alassad Z, Milo A. Nat. Chem. 2019; 11: 543
• 17a DiRocco DA, Oberg KM, Dalton DM, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 10872
• 17b Um JM, DiRocco DA, Noey EL, Rovis T, Houk KN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 11249
• 17c DiRocco DA, Noey EL, Houk KN, Rovis T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 2391
• 17d Langdon SM, Wilde MM. D, Thai K, Gravel M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 7539
• 18 Moore JL, Silvestri AP, Read de Alaniz J, DiRocco DA, Rovis T. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 1742
• 19 Domingo LR, Zaragozá RJ, Saéz JA, Arnó M. Molecules 2012; 17: 1335
• 20 Read de Alaniz J, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 6284
• 21 A system that includes multiple stereocenters is currently being investigated.
• 22 A simple plug-and-play Microsoft Excel script for an expedited solution for k _rel values is included in the Supporting Information.
• 23a Yu RT, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 12370
• 23b Friedman RK, Oberg KM, Dalton DM, Rovis T. Pure Appl. Chem. 2010; 82: 1353
• 24 Yu RT, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 2782
• 25 Dalton DM, Oberg KM, Yu RT, Lee EE, Perreault S, Oinen ME, Pease ML, Malik G, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 15717
• 26 Dalton DM, Rappé AK, Rovis T. Chem. Sci. 2013; 4: 2062
• 27 Taken in part from: Munoz A. The Development of Novel N-Heterocyclic Carbenes and Tools for Assessing Structural Variation Effects Upon Catalyst Reactivity 2018
• 28 Typical Procedure: Stock solutions of 10 (1.0 M in toluene), C-1 (0.1 M in toluene), C-5 (0.1 M in toluene), and KHMDS (0.1 M in toluene) were freshly prepared inside a glovebox under N₂ atmosphere. From these stock solutions, C-1 (3.45 mL, 2.5 mol%) and C-5 (3.45 mL, 2.5 mol%) were dosed inside a scrupulously dried 1-dram vial, into which 600 mL of degassed and anhydrous toluene (0.023 M) was added. KHMDS (6.9 mL from 0.1 M stock solution, 5 mol%) was added and the reaction was stirred for 5 minutes. Substrate 10 was then dosed (13.8 mL from 0.1 M stock solution, 5 mol%) and the reaction was stirred for 1 hour. The reaction mixture was then concentrated to dryness in vacuo. The crude reaction mixture was filtered over a Celite plug with DCM and then subject to analysis by chiral-phase HPLC.