High SMAS Facelift: Combined Single Flap Lifting of the Midface, Cheek, and Jawline

Abstract

The traditional deep plane and “low” cheek superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flaps elevated below the zygomatic arch suffer the drawback that they cannot, by design, exert an effect on tissues of the midface and infra-orbital region. Traditional deep plane and low designs target the lower cheek and jowl only and produce no improvement in the upper anterior cheek and “midface” area. Planning the flap “higher,” along the zygomatic arch, and extending the dissection medially in an “extended SMAS” fashion to release and mobilize midface tissue, overcomes this problem and allows a combined, simultaneous, single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. An improved outcome is obtained in many patients and no separate midface lift procedure is needed.

Keywords

facelift - SMAS - high SMAS - midface lift - facelift incision

Publication History

Article published online:
23 December 2022

• References

• 1 Marten TJ, Elyassnia D. . Secondary facelift. In Plastic Surgery Neligan, ed 2017
• 2 Hamra S. Composite Rhytidectomy. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 1993
• 3 Hamra ST. Building the composite facelift: a personal odyssey. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 85-96
• 4 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (01) 1-13
• 5 Marten TJ. . “Lamellar High SMAS Face and Mid-face Lift” The Art of Aesthetic Surgery (Foad Nahai, MD 3 ed.) QMP 2019
• 6 Marten TJ. Facelift. Planning and technique. Clin Plast Surg 1997; 24 (02) 269-308
• 7 Marten TJ. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 569-603 , vi–vii
• 8 Hamra ST. The zygorbicular dissection in composite rhytidectomy: an ideal midface plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (05) 1646-1657
• 9 Tonnard PL, Verpaele AM. The MACS-lift short scar rhytidectomy. St Louis: Quality Medical; 2004
• 10 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Baker TM. Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (02) 295-311
• 11 Trussler AP, Stephan P, Hatef D, Schaverien M, Meade R, Barton FE. The frontal branch of the facial nerve across the zygomatic arch: anatomical relevance of the high-SMAS technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (04) 1221-1229
• 12 Owsley J. Aesthetic Facial Surgery. WB Saunders; 1994
• 13 Marten TJ, Elyassnai D. Simultaneous facelift and fat grafting: combined lifting and filling of the face. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42 (02) 219-252 April 01, 201
• 14 Marten T, Elyassnia D. Facial fat grafting: why, where, how, and how much. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (05) 1278-1297
• 15 Marten TJ. Maintenance Facelift: Early Facelift for Younger Patients. In: Marten T. ed. Facelift: State of the Art Seminars in Plastic Surgery. Thieme Medical Publishing; Semin Plast Surg 2002; 16(4)
• 16 Connell BF, Marten TJ. The trifurcated SMAS flap: three-part segmentation of the conventional flap for improved results in the midface, cheek, and neck. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995; 19 (05) 415-420
• 17 Marten TJ, Elyassnai D. . “Male Facelift” In Plastic Surgery Neligan, ed 2017
• 18 Marten T, Elyassnia D. Neck lift: defining anatomic problems and choosing appropriate treatment strategies. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 455-484
• 19 Marten T, Elyassnia D. Short scar neck lift: neck lift using a submental incision only. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 585-600
• 20 Marten T, Elyassnia D. Management of the platysma in neck lift. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 555-570