Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36(01): 037-046
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758776
Review Article

Gaining Mesenteric Length following Colorectal Resection: Essential Maneuvers to Avoid Anastomotic Tension

Herschel David Vargas
1   Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

A surgeon must possess the knowledge and technical skill to obtain length following a left-sided colorectal resection to perform a tension free anastomosis. The distal target organ – either rectum or anus – is fixed in location, and therefore requires surgeons to acquire mastery of proximal mobilization of the colonic conduit. Generally, splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) provides adequate length. Surgeons benefit from clearer understanding of the multiple steps involved in SFM as a result of improved visualization and demonstration of the relevant anatomy – adjacent organs and the attachments, embryologic planes, and mesenteric structures. Much may be attributed to laparoscopic and robotic platforms which provided improved exposure and as a result, development or refinement of novel approaches for SFM with potential advantages. Complete mobilization draws upon the sum or combination of the varied approaches to accomplish the goal. However, in the situation where extended resection is necessary or in the case of re-operative surgery sacrificing either more proximal or distal large intestine often occurs, the transverse colon or even the ascending colon represents the proximal conduit for anastomosis. This challenging situation requires familiarity with special maneuvers to achieve colorectal or coloanal anastomosis using these more proximal conduits. In such instances, operative techniques such as either ileal mesenteric window with retroileal anastomosis or de-rotation of the right colon (Deloyer's procedure) enable the intestinal surgeon to construct such anastomoses and thereby avoid stoma creation or loss of additional large intestine.

Keywords

colorectal anastomosis - length - tension-free


Publication History

Article published online:
13 January 2023

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR. et al. Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58 (03) 333-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (03) 131-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg 2013; 148 (02) 190-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rosendorf J, Klicova M, Herrmann I. et al. Intestinal anastomotic healing: what do we know about processes behind anastomotic complications. Front Surg 2022; 9: 904810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77 (03) 549-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chand M, Miskovic D, Parvaiz AC. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection?. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (11) 1195-1197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ludwig KA, Kosinski L. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection? Another view. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (11) 1198-1200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kalady EHCaMF. Colon cancer surgical treatment: principles of colectomy. In: Steele SR, Hull TL, Hyman N, Maykel JA, Read TE, Whitlow CB. eds. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. 4th ed.. Springer; 2022: 455-462 :chap 25
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Pang AJ, Marinescu D, Morin N, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M. Segmental resection of splenic flexure colon cancers provides an adequate lymph node harvest and is a safe operative approach – an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (08) 5652-5659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Horsey ML, Sparks AD, Lai D, Herur-Raman A, Ng M, Obias V. Surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched study comparing open and minimally invasive approaches using the national cancer database. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36 (12) 2739-2747
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Degiuli M, Reddavid R, Ricceri F. et al; and Members of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CCN) Collaborative Group [A listing of all authors appears at the end of the article]. Segmental colonic resection is a safe and effective treatment option for colon cancer of the splenic flexure: a nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (10) 1372-1382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chen YC, Fingerhut A, Shen MY. et al. Colorectal anastomosis after laparoscopic extended left colectomy: techniques and outcome. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22 (09) 1189-1194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pitel S, Lefèvre JH, Tiret E, Chafai N, Parc Y. Redo coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective study of 66 patients. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (05) 806-810 , discussion 810–811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Maggiori L, Ferron M, Alves A, Panis Y. Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a valuable surgical challenge. Surgery 2011; 149 (01) 65-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kontovounisios C, Baloyiannis Y, Kinross J, Tan E, Rasheed S, Tekkis P. Modified right colon inversion technique as a salvage procedure for colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16 (12) 971-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Manceau G, Karoui M, Breton S. et al. Right colon to rectal anastomosis (Deloyers procedure) as a salvage technique for low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: postoperative and long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (03) 363-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Beatty GTAaJS. Colonic physiology. In: SR Steele TH, N Hyman, JA Maykel, TE Read, CB Whitlow, eds. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon Rectal Surgery. 4th ed.. Springer Nature; 2022: 29-40 :chap 2
    Google Scholar
  • 18 You YN, Chua HK, Nelson H, Hassan I, Barnes SA, Harrington J. Segmental vs. extended colectomy: measurable differences in morbidity, function, and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (07) 1036-1043
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think. Ann Surg 2007; 245 (02) 254-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Isik O, Benlice C, Gorgun E. A novel approach for robotic mobilization of the splenic flexure. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21 (01) 53-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jeri-McFarlane S, García-Granero Á, Frasson M, Gonzalez-Argente FX. Surgical steps for splenic flexure mobilization by inframesocolic medial approach. Cir Esp (Engl Ed) 2022; 100 (06) 370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kumamoto T, Shinohara H, Tomizawa K. et al. Inferior pancreatic approach for laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22 (01) 71-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lee YS. Three surgical approaches of laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization. J Minim Invasive Surg 2019; 22 (02) 85-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Liang JT, Huang J, Chen TC. Standardize the surgical technique and clarify the relevant anatomic concept for complete mobilization of colonic splenic flexure using da Vinci Xi® robotic system. World J Surg 2019; 43 (04) 1129-1136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Garcia-Granero A, Primo Romaguera V, Millan M. et al. A video guide of five access methods to the splenic flexure: the concept of the splenic flexure box. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (06) 2763-2772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Matsuda T, Sumi Y, Yamashita K. et al. Anatomical and embryological perspectives in laparoscopic complete mesocoloic excision of splenic flexure cancers. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (03) 1202-1208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Isik O, Sapci I, Aytac E. et al. Laparoscopy reduces iatrogenic splenic injuries during colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22 (10) 767-771
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Merchea A, Dozois EJ, Wang JK, Larson DW. Anatomic mechanisms for splenic injury during colorectal surgery. Clin Anat 2012; 25 (02) 212-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Boström P, Hultberg DK, Häggström J. et al. Oncological impact of high vascular tie after surgery for rectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 2021; 274 (03) e236-e244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yang Y, Wang G, He J, Zhang J, Xi J, Wang F. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 52: 20-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bonnet S, Berger A, Hentati N. et al. High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (05) 515-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Araujo SE, Seid VE, Kim NJ, Bertoncini AB, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. Assessing the extent of colon lengthening due to splenic flexure mobilization techniques: a cadaver study. Arq Gastroenterol 2012; 49 (03) 219-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kim HS, Kim JG, Cho HM. How much colonic redundancy could be obtained by splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic anterior or low anterior resection?. Int J Med Sci 2014; 11 (09) 857-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Benseler V, Hornung M, Iesalnieks I. et al. Different approaches for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure during laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27 (11) 1521-1529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kim HJ, Kim CH, Lim SW, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR. An extended medial to lateral approach to mobilize the splenic flexure during laparoscopic low anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 (02) e93-e98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Andersen BT, Stimec BV, Edwin B, Kazaryan AM, Maziarz PJ, Ignjatovic D. Re-interpreting mesenteric vascular anatomy on 3D virtual and/or physical models: positioning the middle colic artery bifurcation and its relevance to surgeons operating colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (01) 100-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sugarbaker PH. Progressive release of the left colon for a tension-free colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Cancer Treat Res 1996; 82: 255-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Vargas HD, Margolin DA. Anastomotic construction. In: Steele SR, Hull TL, Hyman N, Maykel JA, Read TE, Whitlow CB. eds. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. Springer International Publishing; 2022: 157-187
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Toupet A. Intermediate colectomy with transmesenteric angulo-sigmoid anastomosis. Presse Med 1961; 69: 2693-2694
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Toupet A. Colonectomies with transmesenteric anastomosis. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 1963; 89: 628-630
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hays LV, Davis DR. A technic for restoring intestinal continuity after left hemicolectomy for cancer of the distal colon and rectum. Am J Surg 1976; 131 (03) 390-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rombeau JL, Collins JP, Turnbull Jr RB. Left-sided colectomy with retroileal colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1978; 113 (08) 1004-1005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Campanati RG, Hanan B, Gomes da Silva R. Laparoscopic retroileal pull-through colorectal anastomosis technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65 (04) e239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Sakamoto Y, Tokunaga R, Miyamoto Y. et al. Retroileal colorectal anastomosis after extended left colectomy: application for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Today 2016; 46 (12) 1476-1478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Dunlavy P, Allan L, Raman S. Totally laparoscopic retroileal transverse colon to rectal anastomosis following extended left colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60 (11) 1224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Blank JJ, Gibson EK, Peterson CY, Ridolfi TJ, Ludwig KA. Retroileal anastomosis in hand-assisted laparoscopic left colectomy: experience at a single institution. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (08) 3408-3413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Le TH, Gathright Jr JB. Reconstitution of intestinal continuity after extended left colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36 (02) 197-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kent I, Gilshtein H, Wexner SD. The retro-ileal pull-through technique for colorectal and coloanal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24 (09) 943-946
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Kream J, Ludwig KA, Ridolfi TJ, Peterson CY. Achieving low anastomotic leak rates utilizing clinical perfusion assessment. Surgery 2016; 160 (04) 960-967
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Hayami S, Matsuda K, Iwamoto H. et al. Visualization and quantification of anastomotic perfusion in colorectal surgery using near-infrared fluorescence. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 23 (10) 973-980
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Impellizzeri HG, Pulvirenti A, Inama M. et al. Near-infrared fluorescence angiography for colorectal surgery is associated with a reduction of anastomotic leak rate. Updates Surg 2020; 72 (04) 991-998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Lillehei RC, Wangensteen OH. Bowel function after colectomy for cancer, polyps, and diverticulitis. J Am Med Assoc 1955; 159 (03) 163-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Deloyers L. Technic permitting the easy assurance of continuity of the colon & conservation of sphincter after excision of the left transverse hemicolon & entire left colon; possible inclusion of rectum. J Chir (Paris) 1958; 75 (02) 147-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Mialaret. Reversal of the right hemicolon in surgery of the left colon & rectum. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 1958; 84 (28-29): 878-879
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Deloyers L. Suspension of the right colon permits without exception preservation of the anal sphincter after extensive colectomy of the transverse and left colon (including rectum). Technic -indications- immediate and late results. Lyon Chir 1964; 60: 404-413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Costalat G, Garrigues JM, Didelot JM, Yousfi A, Boccasanta P. Subtotal colectomy with ceco-rectal anastomosis (Deloyers) for severe idiopathic constipation: an alternative to total colectomy reducing risks of digestive sequelae. Ann Chir 1997; 51 (03) 248-255
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Marchesi F, Sarli L, Percalli L. et al. Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis in the treatment of slow-transit constipation: long-term impact on quality of life. World J Surg 2007; 31 (08) 1658-1664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Roncoroni L, Sarli L, Costi R, Violi V. Caecal-rectal antiperistaltic anastomosis without torsion of the vascular pedicle. Ann Chir 2000; 125 (09) 871-873
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Jouvin I, Pocard M, Najah H. Deloyers procedure. J Visc Surg 2018; 155 (06) 493-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Garćia-Ruiz A, Milsom JW, Ludwig KA, Marchesa P. Right colonic arterial anatomy. Implications for laparoscopic surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39 (08) 906-911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Okamoto K, Emoto S, Sasaki K. et al. Extended left colectomy with coloanal anastomosis by indocyanine green-guided deloyers procedure: a case report. J Anus Rectum Colon 2021; 5 (02) 202-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar