Int J Angiol 2023; 32(03): 153-157
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759542
Review Article

The Importance of Engaging in Scientific Research during Medical Training

1   Department of Cardiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
,
1   Department of Cardiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
2   Department of Cardiology, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Many components of required skills and competencies exist, and are felt to contribute to the successful completion of training for independent practice in the medical field as a physician. These requirements are documented and detailed in a temporal fashion during the training period and used for advancement during training as well as documentation of successful completion of that training. While clinical skill development that allows optimal care and treatment of patients is of utmost importance during this training, other components of the training are important and contribute to the ideal development of a well-rounded and credentialed physician. One of these other components which is very important and needs to be recognized is the engagement of medical trainees across disciplines in academic and research scholarly activity. This engagement is an important component of medical training, and the development of skills and didactics geared toward efficient and accurate performance of research is essential.



Publication History

Article published online:
17 January 2023

© 2023. International College of Angiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Acgme.org. 2022 ACGME Home. Accessed July 31st, 2022 at: https://www.acgme.org/
  • 2 Fuster V, Halperin JL, Williams ES. et al. COCATS 4 task force 1: training in ambulatory, consultative, and longitudinal cardiovascular care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65 (17) 1734-1753
  • 3 Acgme.org. 2022 Specialty Specific Requirements. Accessed August 04, 2022 at: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pdfs/specialty-specific-requirement-topics/dio-scholarly_activity_resident-fellow.pdf
  • 4 Alguire PC, Anderson WA, Albrecht RR, Poland GA. Resident research in internal medicine training programs. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124 (03) 321-328
  • 5 Kanna B, Deng C, Erickson SN, Valerio JA, Dimitrov V, Soni A. The research rotation: competency-based structured and novel approach to research training of internal medicine residents. BMC Med Educ 2006; 6 (01) 52
  • 6 Ruiz J, Wallace EL, Miller DP. et al. A comprehensive 3-year internal medicine residency research curriculum. Am J Med 2011; 124 (05) 469-473
  • 7 Rothberg MB, Kleppel R, Friderici JL, Hinchey K. Implementing a resident research program to overcome barriers to resident research. Acad Med 2014; 89 (08) 1133-1139
  • 8 Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J, Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev 2017; 41 (01) 45-53
  • 9 Hanney S, Boaz A, Jones T, Soper B. Engagement in research: an innovative three-stage review of the benefits for health-care performance. Health Serv Deliv Res 2013; 1 (08) 152
  • 10 Timmermans S, Angell A. Evidence-based medicine, clinical uncertainty, and learning to doctor. J Health Soc Behav 2001; 42 (04) 342-359
  • 11 Hatala R, Guyatt G. Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. JAMA 2002; 288 (09) 1110-1112
  • 12 Hebert RS, Levine RB, Smith CG, Wright SM. A systematic review of resident research curricula. Acad Med 2003; 78 (01) 61-68
  • 13 Hébert-Croteau N, Brisson J, Lemaire J, Latreille J. The benefit of participating to clinical research. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 91 (03) 279-281
  • 14 Fakhry SM, Trask AL, Waller MA, Watts DD. IRTC Neurotrauma Task Force. Management of brain-injured patients by an evidence-based medicine protocol improves outcomes and decreases hospital charges. J Trauma 2004; 56 (03) 492-499 , discussion 499–500
  • 15 Clark SL, Belfort MA, Byrum SL, Meyers JA, Perlin JB. Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (02) 105.e1-105.e7
  • 16 Gislason GH, Rasmussen JN, Abildstrom SZ. et al. Persistent use of evidence-based pharmacotherapy in heart failure is associated with improved outcomes. Circulation 2007; 116 (07) 737-744
  • 17 Internal Medicine Rankings. US News. Accessed August 11, 2022 at: Published 2022 https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-medical-schools/internal-medicine-rankings
  • 18 Medical Schools Methodology. US News. Accessed August 15, 2022 at: Published 2022 https://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/articles/medical-schools-methodology
  • 19 Levine RB, Hebert RS, Wright SM. Resident research and scholarly activity in internal medicine residency training programs. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20 (02) 155-159
  • 20 Crowe J, Boe A. Integrating undergraduate research into social science curriculum: benefits and challenges of two models. Educ Sci (Basel) 2019; 9 (04) 1-13
  • 21 Burgoyne LN, O'Flynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Educ Online 2010; 15 (01) 5212
  • 22 Houlden RL, Raja JB, Collier CP, Clark AF, Waugh JM. Medical students' perceptions of an undergraduate research elective. Med Teach 2004; 26 (07) 659-661
  • 23 Takahashi O, Ohde S, Jacobs JL, Tokuda Y, Omata F, Fukui T. Residents' experience of scholarly activities is associated with higher satisfaction with residency training. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24 (06) 716-720
  • 24 Seaburg LA, Wang AT, West CP. et al. Associations between resident physicians' publications and clinical performance during residency training. BMC Med Educ 2016; 16 (01) 22
  • 25 Potti A, Mariani P, Saeed M, Smego Jr RA. Residents as researchers: expectations, requirements, and productivity. Am J Med 2003; 115 (06) 510-514
  • 26 Calhoun KH, Bailey BJ. Thriving in academic medicine. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117 (06) 575-579
  • 27 Souba WW, Tanabe KK, Gadd MA, Smith BL, Bushman MS. Attitudes and opinions toward surgical research. A survey of surgical residents and their chairpersons. Ann Surg 1996; 223 (04) 377-383
  • 28 Hillman BJ, Fajardo LL, Witzke DB, Cardenas D, Irion M, Fulginiti JV. Factors influencing radiologists to choose research careers. Invest Radiol 1989; 24 (11) 842-848
  • 29 Zahtz G, Vambutas A, Hussey HM, Rosen L. Resident research experience and career path association: a national survey of recent otolaryngology graduates. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 151 (01) 46-51
  • 30 Rosenberg LE. Young physician-scientists: internal Medicine's challenge. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133 (10) 831-832
  • 31 Rothberg MB. Overcoming the obstacles to research during residency: what does it take?. JAMA 2012; 308 (21) 2191-2192
  • 32 Rivera JA, Levine RB, Wright SM. Completing a scholarly project during residency training. Perspectives of residents who have been successful. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20 (04) 366-369
  • 33 Bechtold JE, Williams BR, Weinstein SL. et al. The pursuit of scholarship: why we should care about resident research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (22) e119
  • 34 Manring MM, Panzo JA, Mayerson JL. A framework for improving resident research participation and scholarly output. J Surg Educ 2014; 71 (01) 8-13