Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770948
Barriers to Implementation of Advanced Endoscopic Procedures

Abstract
Advanced endoscopy has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis and treatment of both benign and low-grade malignant colorectal lesions. In fact, advanced endoscopic procedures are being adopted as standard approaches to these lesions in many places around the world; however, their implementation in the United States has not been as widespread. We ascribe the difficulty in implementation to two reasons: (1) lack of advanced endoscopic training and (2) failure in reimbursement models as they relate to endoscopy. In this article, we hope to describe these barriers and inspire colorectal surgeons to try and overcome them. As surgical specialists with a mastery of endoscopic techniques, colorectal surgeons would be able to maximize benefit for their patients and minimize health care costs in the long run.
Publication History
Article published online:
17 July 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Lee SW, Ross HM, Rivadeneira DE, Steele SR, Feingold DL. Advanced Colonoscopy and Endoluminal Surgery. 1st ed.. Springer International Publishing; 2017
- 2 Sedlack RE. Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74 (02) 355-366.e1 , 2
- 3 Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, Nelligan G, Lucey MR, Gaumnitz EA. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71 (02) 319-324
- 4 Leyden JE, Doherty GA, Hanley A. et al. Quality of colonoscopy performance among gastroenterology and surgical trainees: a need for common training standards for all trainees?. Endoscopy 2011; 43 (11) 935-940
- 5 Muthukuru S, Alomari M, Bisen R. et al. Quality of colonoscopy: a comparison between gastroenterologists and nongastroenterologists. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (07) 980-987
- 6 Sakamoto T, Saito Y, Fukunaga S, Nakajima T, Matsuda T. Learning curve associated with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for endoscopists experienced in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (10) 1307-1312
- 7 Ohata K, Ito T, Chiba H, Tsuji Y, Matsuhashi N. Effective training system in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 2012; 24 (Suppl. 01) 84-89
- 8 Ge PS, Aihara H. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques: endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67 (05) 1521-1538
- 9 Wickham CJ, Wang J, Mirza KL. et al. “Unresectable” polyp management utilizing advanced endoscopic techniques results in high rate of colon preservation. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (03) 2121-2128
- 10 Tanaka S, Asayama N, Shigita K, Hayashi N, Oka S, Chayama K. Towards safer and appropriate application of endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal carcinoma as total excisional biopsy: future perspectives. Dig Endosc 2015; 27 (02) 216-222
- 11 Ikematsu H, Yoda Y, Matsuda T. et al. Long-term outcomes after resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancers. Gastroenterology 2013; 144 (03) 551-559 , quiz e14
- 12 Yoda Y, Ikematsu H, Matsuda T. et al. A large-scale multicenter study of long-term outcomes after endoscopic resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2013; 45 (09) 718-724
- 13 Vogel JD, Felder SI, Bhama AR. et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65 (02) 148-177
- 14 Watanabe D, Toyonaga T, Ooi M. et al. Clinical outcomes of deep invasive submucosal colorectal cancer after ESD. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (04) 2123-2130
- 15 2022 Coding & Payment Quick Reference for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). 2022 Accessed September 14, 2022 at: https://www.bostonscientific.com/content/dam/bostonscientific/Reimbursement/Gastroenterology/pdf/ESD_coding_and_payment_quick_reference.pdf
- 16 Steele SR, Hull TL, Hyman N, Maykel JA, Read TE, Whitlow CB. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. 4th ed.. Springer International Publishing; 2022
- 17 Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) for Medical and Surgical Services Policy. Professional. 2022. Accessed September 14, 2022 at: www.uhcprovider.com https://www.uhcprovider.com/content/dam/provider/docs/public/policies/medadv-reimbursement/MEDADV-Multiple-Procedure-Payment-Reduction-Medical-Surgical-Services-Policy.pdf
- 18 Cohan JN, Donahue C, Pantel HJ. et al. Endoscopic step up: a colon-sparing alternative to colectomy to improve outcomes and reduce costs for patients with advanced neoplastic polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (06) 842-849
- 19 Law R, Das A, Gregory D. et al. Endoscopic resection is cost-effective compared with laparoscopic resection in the management of complex colon polyps: an economic analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83 (06) 1248-1257
- 20 Gamaleldin M, Benlice C, Delaney CP, Steele S, Gorgun E. Management of the colorectal polyp referred for resection: a case-matched comparison of advanced endoscopic surgery and laparoscopic colectomy. Surgery 2018; 163 (03) 522-527
- 21 Jayaram A, Barr N, Plummer R, Yao M, Chen L, Yoo J. Combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) for benign colon polyps: a single institution cost analysis. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (10) 3238-3242
- 22 Yoon D, Mirza KL, Wickham C. et al. Young Colorectal Surgeons & Advanced Endoscopic Procedures: is Exposure & Higher Confidence Enough for Incorporating Advanced Endoscopic Procedures into Practice?. Abstract June 6-10, Boston, MA. Presented at: The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2020 Annual Scientific Meeting