Horm Metab Res 2018; 50(04): 296-302
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101036
Endocrine Care
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical, Endocrine and Imaging Characteristics of Patients with Primary Hypophysitis

Anna Angelousi
1   Department of Pathophysiology, Endocrine Oncology Unit, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
,
Carolina Cohen
2   Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Soledad Sosa
2   Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Karina Danilowicz
2   Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Lina Papanastasiou
3   Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, “G. Gennimatas”, General Hospital of Athens, Athens Greece
,
Marina Tsoli
1   Department of Pathophysiology, Endocrine Oncology Unit, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
,
Aparna Pal
4   Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
,
Georgios Piaditis
3   Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, “G. Gennimatas”, General Hospital of Athens, Athens Greece
,
Ashley Grossman
4   Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
,
Gregory Kaltsas
1   Department of Pathophysiology, Endocrine Oncology Unit, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received 15. November 2017

accepted 09. Januar 2018

Publikationsdatum:
19. Februar 2018 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Primary hypophysitis (PH) is a rare disease with a poorly-defined natural history. Our aim was to characterise patients with PH at presentation and during prolonged follow-up. Observational retrospective study of 22 patients was conducted from 3 centres. In 14 patients, PH was confirmed histologically and in the remaining 8 clinically, after excluding secondary causes of hypophysitis. All patients had hormonal and imaging investigations before any treatment. Median follow up was 48 months (25–75%: 3–60). There was a female predominance with a female/male ratio: 3.4:1. Eight out of 22 patients had another autoimmune disease. Headaches and gonadal dysfunction were the most common symptoms. Five patients presented with panhypopituitarism; 17 patients had anterior pituitary deficiency, and 7 had diabetes insipidus. At presentation, 9 patients were treated surgically, 5 received replacement hormonal treatment, and 8 high-dose glucocorticoids from whom 5 in association with other immunosuppressive agents. Six patients showed complete recovery of pituitary hormonal deficiencies while 6 showed a partial recovery during a 5-year follow-up period. No difference was found between patients treated with surgery and those treated medically. The overall relapse rate was 18%. PH can be manifested with a broad spectrum of clinical and hormonal disturbances. Long-term follow-up is required to define the natural history of the disease and response to treatment, since pituitary hormonal recovery or relapse may appear many years after initial diagnosis. We suggest that surgery and immunosuppressive therapy be reserved for exceptional cases.