Endoscopy 2018; 50(03): 194-196
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101259
Editorial
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The BASIC Classification: does it shed (blue) light on colorectal polyp differentiation?

Referring to Bisschops R et al. p. 211–220
Sarah K. McGill
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 February 2018 (online)

“Vision is the art of seeing what is invisible to others.”
Jonathan Swift

In recent years, the vision of using optical diagnosis to guide colorectal polyp management at the moment of detection has challenged the standard of universal resection and pathology for all polyps [1]. In the optical diagnosis paradigm, ubiquitous diminutive rectosigmoid polyps without malignant potential could be left in situ, diminutive adenomas could be resected without formal pathology and their presence considered in surveillance interval calculations, and deeply submucosal invasive cancers could be biopsied and marked for surgical resection [2]. Image-enhancement tools and optical magnification have illuminated features of polyps previously “invisible” with white light alone, and provided tools to advance optical diagnosis closer toward reality.

“BASIC falls short of providing a user-friendly tool for optical diagnosis, but its shortcomings provide insights to improve future work.”

Blue-light imaging (BLI) is one of these tools. BLI, which has been recently integrated into Fujinon colonoscopes available in Europe, directly shines a blue light, which is optimally absorbed by hemoglobin. By contrast, narrow-band imaging used in Europe and the United States (Olympus Exera) employs an optical filter during image processing, and the Pentax I-SCAN system enhances each of three primary color components of an image before calculating the virtual image [3].

In this issue of Endoscopy, Bisschops et al. describe their use of BLI to develop a new optical diagnosis classification system, called BASIC (BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification) [4].

 
  • References

  • 1 Kaminski MF, Hassan C, Bisschops R. et al. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 435-449
  • 2 Wilson AI, Kaltenbach T. Optical diagnosis of colorectal lesions requires technology, dedication, and knowledge of its limits. Endosc Int Open 2014; 2: E133-134
  • 3 Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Friedland S. et al. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technology assessment on image-enhanced endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 327-340
  • 4 Bisschops R, Hassan C, Bhandari P. et al. BASIC (BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification) classification for colorectal polyp characterization with blue light imaging. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 211-220
  • 5 Tanaka S, Saitoh Y, Matsuda T. et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol 2015; 50: 252-260
  • 6 Gellad ZF, Voils CI, Lin L. et al. Clinical practice variation in the management of diminutive colorectal polyps: results of a national survey of gastroenterologists. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 873-878
  • 7 Lieberman D, Brill J, Canto M. et al. Management of diminutive colon polyps based on endoluminal imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1860-1866
  • 8 Committee AT, Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N. et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 502 e1-502 e16
  • 9 Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y. et al. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 599-607
  • 10 Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG. et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 625-632
  • 11 McGill SK, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. et al. Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics. Gut 2013; 62: 1704-1713
  • 12 Kaltenbach T, Rastogi A, Rouse RV. et al. Real-time optical diagnosis for diminutive colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging: the VALID randomised clinical trial. Gut 2015; 64: 1569-1577
  • 13 Rees CJ, Rajasekhar PT, Wilson A. et al. Narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice: the Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD 2) study. Gut 2017; 66: 887-895
  • 14 IJspeert JE, Bastiaansen BA, van Leerdam ME. et al. Development and validation of the WASP classification system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Gut 2016; 65: 963-970
  • 15 Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE. et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 526-533
  • 16 Sumimoto K, Tanaka S, Shigita K. et al. Clinical impact and characteristics of the narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 816-821