Do We Need the Overtube for Push-Enteroscopy?

Background and Aims: Push-enteroscopy is well established in many gastroenterological departments. There is no agreement about whether the use of an overtube is helpful to optimize the depth of insertion. In this prospective and randomized study we investigated the effect of the overtube for push-type enteroscopy.

Patients and Methods: Between August 1999 and August 2000, 80 patients (47 male, 33 female; age 63.1, range 20 - 90 years), who underwent investigation by push-enteroscopy were randomly allocated to two groups. Group T underwent investigation with the Olympus push-enteroscope SIF 100 with an overtube and group NT without an overtube. The length of insertion was estimated by fluoroscopy, by counting the folds of the small bowel and by insertion length in centimeters, while the scope was drawn back to the pylorus. The number of pathological findings was documented and patient comfort was measured by means of a standard questionnaire completed after enteroscopy.

Results: Both groups were comparable with regard to age, gender, indication for enteroscopy and pathological findings. There was a highly significant correlation between the length of insertion measured in centimeters and the counted folds in both groups (correlation 0.57, P < 0.001 in group T; 0.80, P < 0.001 in group NT). The length of insertion estimated by means of fluoroscopy was not reliable in determination of the exact length of insertion. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the insertion depth between group T (mean values: insertion length 72.4 cm, counted folds 99.3) and group NT (mean values: insertion length 60.8 cm, counted folds 74.1).

Conclusions: The use of an overtube in push-enteroscopy is advantageous with respect to the depth of insertion (significant difference between group T and NT in counted folds and the insertion depth in centimeters). At this time, this gain of insertion length did not result in a higher rate of pathological findings. Nevertheless, we would recommend the use of an overtube in performing push-type enteroscopy in order to increase the number of pathological findings.

References

• 1 Gostout C J, Schroeder K W, Burton D D. Small bowel enteroscopy: an early experience in gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 5-8
• 2 Chong J, Tagle M, Barkin J S, et al. Small bowel push-type fiberoptic enteroscopy for patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding or suspected small bowel pathology.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 2143-2146
• 3 Barkin J S, Chong J, Reiner D K. First-generation video enteroscope: fourth-generation push-type small bowel enteroscopy utilizing an overtube.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 743-747
• 4 Davies G R, Benson M J, Gertner D J, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic push type enteroscopy in clinical use.  Gut. 1995;  37 346-352
• 5 Rossini F P, Arrigoni A, Pennazio M. Clinical enteroscopy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996;  22 231-235
• 6 Morris A J, Mokhashi M, Straiton M, et al. Push enteroscopy and heater probe therapy for small bowel bleeding.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 394-397
• 7 O’Mahony S, Morris A J, Straiton M. Push enteroscopy in the investigation of small bowel disease.  QJM. 1996;  89 685-690
• 8 Benz C, Martin W R, Arnold J, et al. Die endoskopische Untersuchung des Dünndarms mit Push-Enteroskopie. Eine prospektive Untersuchung.  Dtsch Med Wschr. 1997;  122 391-395
• 9 Landi B, Tkoub M, Gaudrick M, et al. Diagnostic yield of push-type enteroscopy in relation to indication.  Gut. 1998;  42 421-425
• 10 Chak A, Cooper G S, Canto M I, et al. Enteroscopy for the initial evaluation of iron deficiency.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 144-148
• 11 Pennazio M, Rossini F P. Main issues in push enteroscopy.  Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;  30 96-101
• 12 Adriain A, Dabezies M A, Krevsky B. Enteroscopy improves the clinical outcome in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998;  8 279-284
• 13 Waye J D. Small-bowel endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 133-140
• 14 MacKenzie J F. Push enteroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1999;  9 29-36
• 15 Lewis B S. The history of enteroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1999;  9 1-11
• 16 Swain P C. The role of enteroscopy in clinical practice.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1999;  9 135-144
• 17 Waye J D. Small-bowel endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 56-59
• 18 Hayat M, Axon A TR, O’Mahony S. Diagnostic yield and effect on clinical outcomes of push enteroscopy in suspected small-bowel bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 369-372
• 19 Rossini F P, Pennazio M. Small-bowel endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 138-145
• 20 Landi B, Cellier C, Fayemendy L, et al. Duodenal perforation occurring during push enteroscopy (letter).  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 631
• 21 Gay G, Loudu P, Bichet G, Caucher P. Parotid gland and submaxillary enlargement after push video enteroscopy (letter).  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 328
• 22 Bouhnik Y, Bitoun A, Coffin B. Two way push videoenteroscopy in investigation of small bowel disease.  Gut. 1998;  43 280-284
• 23 Schmitt A, Gay F, Adler M, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of push-enteroscopy and long-term follow-up of patients with small bowel angiodysplasias.  Dig Dis Sci. 1996;  41 2348-2352
• 24 Perez-Cuadrado E, Macenlle R, Iglesias J, et al. Usefulness of oral video push enteroscopy in Crohn’s disease.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 745-747
• 25 Zaman A, Katon R M. Push enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding yields a high incidence of proximal lesions within reach of a standard endoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 372-376
• 26 Descamps C, Schmitt A, Van Gossum A. “Missed” upper gastrointestinal tract lesions may explain “occult” bleeding.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 452-455
• 27 Pennazio M, Arrigoni A, Risio M, et al. Clinical evaluation of push-type enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 164-170
• 28 Foutch P G, Sawyer R, Sanoswki R A. Push-enteroscopy for diagnosis of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 337-341