Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2001; 3(4): 398-404
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-16451
Original Paper
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

Pollinators and Reproductive Success of the Wild Cucurbit Cucurbita maxima ssp. andreana (Cucurbitaceae)

L. Ashworth, L. Galetto
  • Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

August 24, 2000

April 9, 2001

Publikationsdatum:
16. August 2001 (online)

Abstract

We studied the reproductive success and pollinators of Cucurbita maxima ssp. andreana in different disturbed habitats where it grows naturally. Data were obtained from three populations. One grew within a soybean crop, the other within a corn crop, and the third in an abandoned crop field. Cucurbita maxima ssp. andreana is an annual vine with a flowering period from December to April. Male flowers appear first, thereafter female and male flowers appear together. Flower lifetime (9 h) was similar in male and female flowers. The pollinator guild was comparable for the three populations but some differences in the frequency of the insect species were observed. Native bees were the main pollinators in the population in the abandoned field, while beetles pollinated the populations in crop fields. These differences were not linked with the pre-emergent reproductive success, fruit and seed set, or fruit quality. This is a self-compatible plant. Fruit and seed set and fruit traits (total mass, width and length of fruits, number of seeds per fruit, and seed mass) did not show significant differences between hand-cross and hand-self pollinated flowers. This wild cucurbit is a generalist with respect to pollinator guild, and flower visitors seem to be highly efficient in pollen transference. Cucurbita maxima ssp. andreana is well adapted to disturbed habitats because plants ripened fruits successfully, regardless of the group of insects visiting flowers.

References

  • 01 Aizen,  M. A., and Feinsinger,  P.. (1994);  Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honey bees in argentine “Chaco Serrano”.  Ecological Applications. 4 378-392
  • 02 Ashworth,  L.. (1997) Estudios sobre la biología reproductiva del zapallo amargo (Cucurbita andreana, Cucurbitaceae). Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina; Undergraduate thesis 1 - 28. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales
  • 03 Contardi,  H. G.. (1939);  Estudios genéticos en Cucurbita y consideraciones agronómicas.  Physis. 18 331-347
  • 04 Dafni,  A.. (1992) Pollination Ecology. A practical approach. Oxford; Oxford University Press pp. 1-250
  • 05 Delesalle,  V. A., and Buchmann,  S. L.. (1991);  Outcrossing hypothesis and weak preference for pistillate flowers in the monoecious cucurbit, Apodanthera undulata. .  Evolutionary Trends in Plants. 5 37-41
  • 06 Dobson,  H. E. M.. (1994) Floral volatiles in insect biology. Insect-plant interactions. Bernays, E. A., ed. Boca Raton; CRC Press Inc. pp. 47-81
  • 07 Galen,  C.,, Plowright,  R. C.,, and Thompson,  J. B.. (1985);  Floral biology and regulation of seed set and seed size in lily, Clintonia borealis. .  American Journal of Botany. 72 1522-1544
  • 08 Hunziker,  A. T., and Subils,  R.. (1975);  Sobre la importancia taxonomica de los nectarios foliares en especies silvestres y cultivadas de Cucurbita. .  Kurtziana. 8 43-47
  • 09 Hurd,  P. D., and Linsley,  E. G.. (1970) A classification of the squash and gourd bees Peponapis and Xenoglossa. . London; University of California Press pp. 1-39
  • 10 Hurd,  P. D.,, Linsley,  E. G.,, and Whitaker,  T. W.. (1971);  Squash and gourd bees (Peponapis, Xenoglossa) and the origin of the cultivated Cucurbita. .  Evolution. 25 218-234
  • 11 Jeffrey,  C.. (1980);  A review of the Cucurbitaceae.  Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 81 233-247
  • 12 Kearns,  C. A., and Inouye,  D. S.. (1997);  Pollinators, flowering plants, and conservation biology: much remains to be learned about pollinators and plants.  Bioscience. 47 297-307
  • 13 Kearns,  C. A.,, Inouye,  D. W.,, and Waser,  N. M.. (1998);  Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions.  Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic. 29 83-112
  • 14 Kevan,  P. G.,, Thomas,  V. G.,, and Belaussoff,  S.. (1997);  AgrECOLture: Defining the ecology in agriculture.  Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 9 109-129
  • 15 Krupnick,  G. A.,, Brown,  K. M.,, and Stephenson,  A. G.. (1999);  The influence of fruit on the regulation of internal ethylene concentrations and sex expression in Cucurbita texana. .  International Journal of Plant Sciences. 160 321-330
  • 16 Lau,  T., and Stephenson,  A. G.. (1993);  Effects of soil nitrogen on pollen production, pollen grain size, and pollen performance in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae).  American Journal of Botany. 80 763-768
  • 17 Leiva,  D. P., and Iannone,  N.. (1994);  Manejo de insectos plaga del cultivo de maíz.  Revista del Instituto nacional de tecnología agropecuaria de Pergamino. 1 1-73
  • 18 Lloyd,  D. G.. (1980);  Sexual strategies in plants I. An hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive session.  New Phytologist. 86 69-79
  • 19 Lloyd,  D. G., and Schoen,  D. J.. (1992);  Self- and cross-fertilization in plants I. Functional dimentions.  International Journal of Plant Sciences. 153 358-369
  • 20 Mabberley,  D. J.. (1997) The plant-book. Cambridge; Cambridge University press pp. 1-809
  • 21 Mallo,  R.. (1939);  Contribución al conocimiento de la biología de Astylus atromaculatus. .  Boletín Técnico del Instituto nacional de tecnología agropecuaria. 6 1-20
  • 22 Martínez-Crovetto,  R.. (1974) Cucurbitaceae. Flora ilustrada de la provincia de Entre Ríos. Burkart, A., ed. Buenos Aires; Instituto nacional de tecnología agropecuaria pp. 63-94
  • 23 Murawski,  D. A.. (1987);  Floral resource variation, pollinator response, and potential pollen flow in Psiguria warscewiczii. .  Ecology. 68 1273-1282
  • 24 Nepi,  M., and Pacini,  E.. (1993);  Pollination, pollen viability and pistil receptivity in Cucurbita pepo. .  Annals of Botany. 72 527-536
  • 25 Nepi,  M.,, Pacini,  E.,, and Willemse,  T. M.. (1996);  Nectary biology of Cucurbita pepo: ecophysiological aspects.  Acta Botanica Neerlandica. 45 41-54
  • 26 Rathcke,  B. J., and Jules,  E. S.. (1993);  Habitat fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions.  Current Science. 65 273-277
  • 27 Richards,  A. J.. (1997) Plant Breeding Systems. London; Chapman and Hall pp. 1-529
  • 28 Rodríguez,  N.,, Falcon,  L. M.,, and Pieri,  S. M.. (1997);  Malezas: reconocimiento de semillas y plántulas.  Revista Estación Experimental Agraria Manfredi. 2 1-204
  • 29 Saade,  R. L.,, Andres,  T. C.,, and Nee,  M.. (1995) Cucurbita L. Estudios taxonómicos y ecogeográficos de las Cucurbitáceas latinoamericanas de importancia económica. Saade, R. L., ed. Rome, Italy; International Plant Genetic Resources pp. 1-115
  • 30 Schlichting,  C. D.,, Stephenson,  A. G.,, and Small,  L. E.. (1990);  Pollen loads and progeny vigor in Cucurbita pepo: the next generation.  Evolution. 44 1358-1372
  • 31 Sokal,  R. R., and Rohlf,  F. J.. (1995) Biometry. New York; Freeman and Company pp. 1-887
  • 32 Stanghellini,  M. S.,, Ambrose,  J. T.,, and Schultheis,  J. R.. (1997);  The effects of honey bee and bumble bee pollination on fruit set and abortion of cucumber and watermelon.  American Bee Journal. 137 386-391
  • 33 Steffan-Dewenter,  I., and Tscharntke,  T.. (1999);  Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set.  Oecologia. 121 432-440
  • 34 Stephenson,  A. G.,, Winsor,  J. A.,, and Davis,  L. E.. (1986) Effects of pollen load size on fruit maturation and sporophyte quality in Zucchini. Biotechnology and ecology of pollen. Mulcahy, D. L., Mulcahy, G. B., and Ottaviano, E., eds. New York; Springer-Verlag pp. 429-434
  • 35 Stephenson,  A. G.,, Lau,  T.,, Quesada,  M.,, and Winsor,  J. A.. (1992) Factors that affect pollen performance. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. Wyatt, R., ed. New York; Chapman and Hall pp. 119-136
  • 36 Sutherland,  S.. (1986);  Patterns of fruit-set: What controls fruit-flower ratios in plants?.  Evolution. 40 117-128
  • 37 Sutherland,  S.. (1987);  Why hermaphroditic plants produce many more flowers than fruits: experimental tests with Agave Mckenveyana. .  Evolution. 41 750-759
  • 38 Teran,  A. L.. (1965);  Relaciones existentes entre insector y flores de Cucurbitáceas de interés agrícola.  Revista agronómica del Noroeste Argentino. 4 187-193
  • 39 Waser,  N. M.,, Chittka,  L.,, Price,  M. V.,, Williams,  N. M.,, and Ollerton,  J.. (1996);  Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters.  Ecology. 77 1043-1060
  • 40 Whitaker,  T. W.. (1931);  Sex ratio and sex expression in the cultivated cucurbits.  American Journal of Botany. 18 359-366
  • 41 Wiens,  D.,, Calvin,  C. L.,, Wilson,  C. A.,, Davern,  C. I.,, Frank,  D.,, and Seavey,  S. R.. (1987);  Reproductive success, spontaneous embryo abortion and genetic load in flowering plants.  Oecologia. 71 501-509
  • 42 Wilson,  H. D.. (1990);  Gene flow in squash species.  BioScience. 40 449-455
  • 43 Wilson,  H. D., and Payne,  J. S.. (1994);  Crop/weed microgametophyte competition in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae).  American Journal of Botany. 81 1531-1537
  • 44 Winsor,  J. A.,, Davis,  L. E.,, and Stephenson,  A. G.. (1987);  The relationship between pollen load and fruit maturation and the effect of pollen load on offspring vigor in Cucurbita pepo. .  American Naturalist. 29 643-656
  • 45 Winsor,  J. A.,, Peretz,  S.,, and Stephenson,  A. G.. (2000);  Pollen competition in a natural population of Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae).  American Journal of Botany. 87 527-532

L. Ashworth

Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

Casilla de Correo 495
5000 Córdoba
Argentina

eMail: lash@imbiv.unc.edu.ar

Section Editor: G. Gottsberger

    >