Male Cones in Taxaceae s. l. - an Example of Wettstein's Pseudanthium Concept

Abstract

Male cones of Taxus baccata L. and Torreya californica Torr. are mostly regarded as simple strobili (“flowers”). In the past some authors assumed that every single “sporangiophore” of Taxus baccata represents a whole “flower”. The male cone of Taxus would then represent a compound strobilus (“inflorescence”). A cone of Cephalotaxus harringtonia (Knight ex J. Forbes) K. Koch and Cephalotaxus fortunei Hook. can easily be recognized as a compound strobilus composed of several simple strobili.

Our developmental studies by SEM give clues to the assumption that a simple male strobilus in Cephalotaxus is not homologous to the male strobili in Taxus and Torreya. Developmental, morphological and anatomical studies suggest that the simple strobili of Taxus and Torreya are derived from the compound strobili in Cephalotaxus by a transformation of the simple strobili into single sporangiophores. With respect to morphology, the male cones in Taxus and Torreya are simple strobili, but comparative developmental studies show that they are derived from compound strobili in a process similar to Wettstein's pseudanthium hypothesis. In the light of our studies, it is not unlikely that the male cones in Pinaceae also represent transformed compound strobili.

Key words

Gymnosperms - Taxaceae - Cephalotaxus - taxonomy - morphology

References

• 01 Čelakowsk¿,  L. J.. (1879);  Zur Gymnospermie der Coniferen.  Flora. 62 257-264, 272 - 283
• 02 Čelakowsk¿,  L. J.. (1898);  Nachtrag zu meiner Schrift über die Gymnospermen.  Bot. Jahrb. Syst.. 24 202-231
• 03 Chaw,  S. M.,, Sung,  H. M.,, Long,  H.,, Zharkikh,  A.,, and Li,  W. H.. (1995);  The phylogenetic positions of the conifer genera Amentotaxus, Phyllocladus, and Nageia inferred from 18S rRNA sequences.  J. Mol. Evol.. 41 224-230
• 04 Cheng,  Y. C.,, Nicolson,  R. G.,, Tripp,  K.,, and Chaw,  S. M.. (2000);  Phylogeny of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae genera inferred from chloroplast matK gene and nuclear rDNA ITS region.  Mol. Phylogen. Evol.. 14 353-365
• 05 Coulter,  J. M., and Land,  W. J. G.. (1905);  Gametophytes and embryo of Torreya taxifolia. .  Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville). 39 161-178
• 06 Doyle,  J.. (1945);  Developmental lines in pollination mechanism in the Coniferales.  Sci. Proc. Roy. Dub. Soc.. 24 43-62
• 07 Dluhosch,  H.. (1937) Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über die Mikrosporophyllgestaltung der Coniferen. Die Blüten der Coniferen III, Vol. 114 (3). Hirmer, M., ed. Bibl. Bot. pp. 1-24
• 08 Dupler,  A. W.. (1919);  Staminate strobilus of Taxus canadensis. .  Bot. Gaz.. 68 345-366
• 09 Florin,  R.. (1938 - 1945);  Die Koniferen des Oberkarbons und des unteren Perms.  Palaeontographica. 85 B 1-729
• 10 Florin,  R.. (1951);  Evolution in cordaites and conifers.  Acta Horti Bergiani. 15 285-388
• 11 Florin,  R.. (1954);  The female reproductive organs of conifers and taxads.  Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.. 29 367-389
• 12 Gerlach,  D.. (1984) Botanische Mikrotechnik, 3 Ed. Stuttgart; Thieme
• 13 Gerstberger,  P., and Leins,  P.. (1978);  Rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Blütenknospen von Physalis philadelphia (Solanaceae).  Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.. 91 381-387
• 14 Hirmer,  M.. (1936) Entwicklungsgeschichte und vergleichende Morphologie des weiblichen Blütenzapfens der Coniferen. Die Blüten der Coniferen I, Vol. 114. Hirmer, M., ed. Bibl. Bot. pp. 1-100
• 15 Mundry,  J.. (2000);  Morphologische und morphogenetische Untersuchungen zur Evolution der Gymnospermen.  Bibl. Bot.. 152 1-90
• 16 Pilger,  R.. (1926) Gymnospermae. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol. 13. Berlin; Duncker Humblot
• 17 Singh . (1961);  The life history and systematic position of Cephalotaxus drupacea Sieb. et Zucc.  Phytomorphology. 11 153-197
• 18 Stefanoviac,  S.,, Jager,  M.,, Deutsch,  J.,, Broutin,  J.,, and Masselot,  M.. (1998);  Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences.  Am. J. Bot.. 85 688-697
• 19 Stützel,  Th.. (1984);  Blüten- und infloreszenzmorphologische Studien zur Systematik der Eriocaulaceen.  Diss. Bot.. 71 108
• 20 Stützel,  T., and Röwekamp,  I.. (1999);  Female reproductive structures in Taxales.  Flora. 194 145-157
• 21 Thomson,  R. B.. (1940);  The structure of the cone in the Coniferae.  Bot. Rev. (Lancaster). 6 73-84
• 22 Wettstein,  R.. (1935) Systematische Botanik, 4th Ed. Leipzig,Wien; Franz Deuticke
• 23 Wilde,  M. H.. (1975);  A new interpretation of microsporangiate cones in Cephalotaxaceae and Taxaceae.  Phytomorphology. 25 434-450
• 24 Wordsell,  W. C.. (1901);  The morphology of the “flower” of Cephalotaxus. .  Ann. Bot. (London). 15 637-652
• 25 Zimmermann,  W.. (1959) Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen, 2nd Ed. Stuttgart; Gustav Fischer

1 By Wordsell, 1901 and Florin, 1938 - 1945 termed “flowers”.

2 By Wordsell, 1901 and Florin, 1938 - 1945 termed “inflorescences”.

Section Editor: G. Gottsberger