Preoperative Laparoscopic Examination Using Surgical Manipulation and Ultrasonography for Pancreatic Lesions

Background and Study Aims: Unnecessary laparotomies in patients with advanced pancreatic disease are unlikely to provide any benefits and may compromise both the quality and duration of survival. The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound to the diagnosis or staging, or both, of pancreatic lesions.
Patients and Methods: Fifty-two patients were diagnosed preoperatively with pancreatic cancer. The diagnoses made by laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) were compared with those made prior to the operation. Laparoscopic visualization of the body of the pancreas was obtained via an infragastric approach. For the laparoscopic examination of the head of the pancreas, a retroduodenal approach was used.
Results: In 52 patients with cancer of the pancreatic head and body, unresectable findings were observed in 13 patients. Portal vein displacement without other unresectable findings was evident in six patients using LUS, and was confirmed at exploratory laparotomy in five patients. The surgical approaches were changed, with seven patients undergoing an open exploration for biliary drainage and the other six patients receiving endoscopic endoprostheses. In six of the 52 patients, LUS-guided needle biopsies and frozen-section examinations detected chronic pancreatitis (n = 4), a malignant lymphoma (n = 1), and an abdominal tuberculosis (n = 1), which were diagnosed preoperatively as pancreatic cancers and cysts. Only one patient undergoing the laparoscopic procedure had acute pancreatitis; this patient was treated conservatively.
Conclusions: LUS, when combined with laparoscopic manipulations, may overcome many of the limitations of laparoscopy alone in the investigation of pancreatic lesions by providing an accurate diagnosis and assessment of the size and extent of the local dissemination.

References

• 1 Watt I, Stewart I, Anderson D. et al . Laparoscopy, ultrasound and computed tomography in cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia: a prospective comparison for detecting intra-abdominal metastases.  Br J Surg. 1989;  76 1036-1039
• 2 Warshaw A L, Gu Z Y, Wittenberg J. et al . Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer.  Arch Surg. 1990;  125 230-233
• 3 Cuesta M A, Meijer S, Borgstein P J. Laparoscopy and assessment of digestive tract cancer.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 486-487
• 4 Carter D C. Cancer of the pancreas.  Gut. 1990;  31 494-496
• 5 Gillen P, Peel A LG. Failure to improve survival by improved diagnostic techniques in patients with malignant jaundice.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 631-633
• 6 Cuschieri A, Hall A W, Clark J. Value of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic carcinoma.  Gut. 1978;  19 672-677
• 7 John T G, Greig J D, Carter D C. et al . Carcinoma of the pancreatic head and periampullary region. Tumor staging with laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography.  Ann Surg. 1995;  221 156-164
• 8 Castillo C F, Warshaw L. Peritoneal metastases in pancreatic carcinoma.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1993;  40 430-432
• 9 van den Bosch R P, van der Schelling G P, Klinkenbijl J HG. et al . Guidelines for the application of surgery and endoprostheses in the palliation of obstructive jaundice in advanced cancer of the pancreas.  Ann Surg. 1994;  219 18-24
• 10 Campbell J P, Wilson S R. Pancreatic neoplasms: how useful is evaluation with US?.  Radiology. 1988;  167 341-344
• 11 Lindsell D RM. Ultrasound imaging of pancreas and biliary tract.  Lancet. 1990;  335 390-393
• 12 Barthet M, Portal I, Boujaoude J. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonographic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer complicating chronic pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 487-491
• 13 Cahn M, Chang K, Nguyen P. et al . Impact of endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration on the surgical management of pancreatic cancer.  Am J Surg. 1996;  172 470-472
• 14 Balthazar E J, Chako A C. Computed tomography of pancreatic masses.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;  85 343-349
• 15 Spencer J A, Ward J, Guthrie J A. et al . Robinson PJ. Assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer with dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging: technique, surgical correlation, and patient outcome.  Eur Radiol. 1998;  8 23-29
• 16 Rong G H, Sindelar W F. Aberrant peripancreatic arterial anatomy: considerations in performing pancreatectomy for malignant neoplasms.  Am Surg. 1987;  53 726-729
• 17 Ishida H. Peritoneoscopy and pancreas biopsy in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1983;  29 211-218
• 18 Cuschieri A. Laparoscopy for pancreatic cancer: does it benefit the patient?.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 1988;  14 41-44
• 19 Miles W FA, Paterson-Brown S, Garden O J. Laparoscopic contact hepatic ultrasonography.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 419-420
• 20 Cuesta M A, Meijer S, Borgstein P J. et al . Laparoscopic ultrasonography for hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancy.  Br J Surg. 1993;  80 1571-1574
• 21 Hann L E, Conlon K C, Dougherty E C. et al . Laparoscopic sonography of peripancreatic tumors: preliminary experience.  Am J Roentgenol. 1997;  169 1257-1262
• 22 Conlon K C, Dougherty E, Klimstra D S. et al . The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy.  Ann Surg. 1996;  223 134-140
• 23 Forse R A, Babineau T, Bleday R. et al . Laparoscopy/thoracoscopy for staging, 1: staging endoscopy in surgical oncology.  Semin Surg Oncol. 1993;  9 51-55
• 24 Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R. et al . Mechanism, management, and prevention of laparoscopic bowel injuries.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 572-574
• 25 Nordestgaard A G, Bodily K C, Osborne R W . et al . Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic procedures.  Am J Surg. 1995;  169 543-545