Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2002; 23(4): 245-256
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35799
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Prosody in Apraxia of Speech

Frank R. Boutsen, Sarah S. Christman
  • The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 December 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Prosody is a complex process that involves modulation of pitch, loudness, duration, and linearity in the acoustic stream to serve linguistic and affective communication goals. It arises from the interaction of distributed neural networks that may be anatomically and functionally lateralized. Intrinsic prosody is mediated largely through left hemisphere mechanisms and encompasses those elements of linguistic microstructure (e.g., syllabic magnitudes and durations, basic consonantal and vocalic gesture specifications, and so) that yield the segmental aspects of speech. Extrinsic prosody is processed primarily by right hemisphere (RH) mechanisms and involves manipulation of intonation across longer perceptual groupings. Intrinsic prosody deficits can lead to several core symptoms of speech apraxia such as difficulty with utterance initiation and syllable transitionalization and may lead to the establishment of inappropriate syllable boundaries. The intrinsic prosody profiles associated with acquired apraxia of speech, developmental speech apraxia, and ataxic dysarthria may aid in the clinical differentiation of these disorders.

KEYWORDS

Intrinsic prosody - extrinsic prosody - dysprosody in apraxia of speech

REFERENCES

  • 1 Sherrington C S. Problems of muscular receptivity.  Nature . 1924;  113 892-894
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gage N, Poeppel D, Roberts T PL, Hickok G. Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds.  Brain Res . 1998;  814 236-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hertrich I, Mathiak K, Lutzenberger W, Ackermann H. Differential impact of periodic and aperiodic speech-like acoustic signals on magnetic M50-M100 fields.  Neuroreport . 2000;  11 4017-4020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Poeppel D, Yellin E, Phillips C. Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked M100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds.  Cognitive Brain Research . 1996;  4 231-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Liss J M, Weismer G. Qualitative acoustic analysis in the study of motor speech disorders.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1992;  92 2984-2987
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ross E D. The aprosodias: functional-anatomic organization of the affective components of language in the right hemisphere.  Arch Neurol . 1981;  38 561-569
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bunton K, Kent R D, Kent J F. Perceptuo-acoustic assessment of prosodic impairment in dysarthria.  Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics . 2000;  14 13-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brown G, Yule G. Discourse Analysis.  Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Gerken L, McGregor K. An overview of prosody and its role in normal and disordered child language.  American Journal of Speech Language Pathology . 1998;  7 38-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chafe W L. The flow of thought and the flow of language. In: Givon T, ed. Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax, Vol 12. New York: Academic Press 1979: 159-182
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Darley F L, Aronson A E, Brown J R. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria.  J Speech Hear Res . 1969;  12 249-269
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Darley F L, Aronson A E, Brown J R. Cluster of deviant speech dimensions in the dysarthrias.  J Speech Hear Res . 1969;  12 462-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Munhall K G. Functional imaging during speech production.  Acta Psychologica . 2001;  107 95-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Holstege G, Bandler R, Saper C B, eds. The Emotional Motor Pathway. Progress in Brain Research, Vol.  107. New York: Elsevier; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 15 DeNil L, Abbs J H. Influence of rate on the upper lip, lower lip, and jaw peak velocity sequencing during bilabial closing movements.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1991;  89 845-849
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Larson C R, Burnett T A, Kiran S, Hain T C. Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice F0 responses.  J Acoust Soc Am . 2000;  107 559-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Larson C R, Burnett T A, Bauer J J, Kiran S, Hain T C. Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.  J Acoust Soc Am . 2001;  110 845-848
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Cotterill R MJ. Cooperation of the basal ganglia, cerebellum, sensory cerebrum, and hippocampus: possible implications for cognition, consciousness, intelligence, and creativity.  Prog Neurobiol . 2001;  64 1-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fujimura O. The C/D model and prosodic control of articulatory behavior.  Phonetica . 2000;  57 128-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kent R D. Research on speech motor control and its disorders. A review and prospective.  J Commun Disord . 2000;  33 391-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Boutsen F R, Christman S S. Aprosodia: whether, where and why?. In: Maassen B, Hulstijn W, Kent R, van Lieshout PHMM, eds. Speech Motor Control in Normal and Disordered Speech. Nijmegen: Vantilt; 2001: 232-236
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Davis B L, MacNeilage P F, Matyear C L, Powell J K. Prosodic correlates of stress in babbling: an acoustical study.  Child Dev . 2000;  71 1258-1270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kewley-Port D, Preston M S. Early apical stop production: a voice onset time analysis.  Journal of Phonetics . 1974;  2 195-210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Macken M A, Barton D. The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: a study of voice onset time in word initial stop consonants.  Journal of Child Language . 1980;  7 433-458
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ackermann H, Graber S, Hertrich I, Daum I. Categorical speech perception in cerebellar disorders.  Brain Lang . 1997;  60 323-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ackermann H, Graber S, Hertrich I, Daum I. Cerebellar contributions to the perception of temporal cues within the speech and nonspeech domain.  Brain Lang . 1999;  67 228-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Auzou P, Ozsancak C, Morris R J. Voice onset time in aphasia, apraxia and dysarthria: a review.  Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics . 2000;  14 131-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Laforce Jr R, Doyon J. Distinct contribution of the striatum and cerebellum to motor learning.  Brain and Cognition . 2001;  45 189-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Salmelin R, Schnitzler A, Schmitz F, Freund H J. Single word reading in developmental stutterers and fluent speakers.  Brain . 2000;  123 1184-1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mayer M, Dogil G, Ackermann H. Prosody in speech function: a paradigm for functional imaging and first result. Proceedings on the Fifth Seminar on Speech Production: Models and Data. Munich: Universitat Munchen; 2000: 281-284
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Hirano S, Kojima H, Naito Y. Cortical speech processing mechanisms while vocalizing visually presented languages.  Neuroreport . 1997;  8 363-367
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hirano S, Kojima H, Naito Y. Cortical processing mechanism for vocalization with auditory feedback.  Neuroreport . 1997;  8 2379-2382
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Houde J F, Nagarajan S, Merzenich M. Modulation of auditory cortex during speech production: a MEG study. Proceedings on the Fifth Seminar on Speech Production: Models and Data. Munich: Universitat Munchen; 2000: 249-252
    Google Scholar
  • 34 McGuire P K, Silbersweig D A, Frith C D. Functional anatomy of verbal self monitoring.  Brain . 1996;  119 907-917
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ball T, Schreiber A, Feige B. The role of higher order motor areas in voluntary movement as revealed by high resolution EEG and fMRI.  Neuroimage . 1999;  10 682-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Martin R E, Goodyear B, Gati J, Menon R. Cerebral cortical representation of automatic and volitional swallowing in humans.  J Neurophysiol . 2001;  85 938-950
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Cunnington R, Windischberger L, Deecke L, Moser E. The preparation of self-initiated and externally triggered movement: a study of event-related fMRI.  Neuroimage . 2000;  15 373-385
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sidtis J J, Strother S C, Anderson J R, Rottenberg D A. Are brain functions really additive?.  Neuroimage . 1999;  9 490-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Fowler C A. An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective.  Journal of Phonetics . 1986;  14 3-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Buccino C, Binkofski G R, Fink G R. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study.  Eur J Neurosci . 2000;  13 400-404
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Shergill S S, Bullmore E T, Brammer M J. A functional study of auditory verbal imagery.  Psychol Med . 2001;  31 241-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Studdert-Kennedy M. Imitation and the emergence of segments.  Phonetica . 2000;  57 276-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Ferguson C A, Farwell C B. Words and sounds in early language acquisition.  Language . 1975;  15 419-439
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Vihman M M. Phonological development.  Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Kuhn G M. On the front cavity resonance and its possible role in speech perception.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1975;  58 428-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Remez R E, Rubin P F, Berns S M, Pardo J S, Lang J R. On the perceptual organization of speech.  Psychol Rev . 1994;  101 129-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 McNeil M, Robin D A, Schmidt R A. Apraxia of speech: definition, differentiation, and treatment. In: McNeil MR, ed. Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders Stuttgart: Thieme 1997: 311-344
    Google Scholar
  • 48 McNeil M R, Doyle P, Wambaugh J. Apraxia of speech: a treatable disorder of motor planning and programming. In: Nadeau E, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Crosson B, eds. Aphasia and Language New York: The Guilford Press 2000: 221-266
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Van der Merwe A. A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech and sensorimotor control. In: McNeil MR, ed. Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders Stuttgart: Thieme 1997: 1-25
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Odell K, Shriberg L D. Prosody-voice characteristics of children and adults with apraxia of speech.  Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics . 2001;  15 275-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >