Endoscopy 2003; 35(1): 55-60
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-36419
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Minilaparoscopy in the Diagnosis of Cirrhosis: Superiority in Patients with Child-Pugh A and Macronodular Disease

I.  Helmreich-Becker 1 , P.  Schirmacher 2 , U.  Denzer 3 , A.  Hensel 3 , K.  H.  Meyer zum Büschenfelde 3 , A.  W.  Lohse 3
  • 1Gastroenterological Clinic, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • 2Department of Pathology, University of Cologne, Germany
  • 3Department of Medicine I, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted: 6 June 2001

Accepted after Revision: 21 May 2002

Publication Date:
02 January 2003 (online)

Background and Study Aims: The diagnosis of cirrhosis has prognostic and therapeutic implications, but early forms are difficult to diagnose. Laparoscopy with histology has been reported to be superior to histology alone, but is often considered to be too invasive. This study aimed to assess whether minilaparoscopy offers similarly high sensitivity coupled with only minor invasiveness.
Patients and Methods: Minilaparoscopy with biopsy was performed in 226 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease. Cirrhosis was diagnosed macroscopically primarily on the basis of nodularity in a nontumorous liver. A histological diagnosis using the modified Knodell score was made without knowledge of the macroscopic assessment.
Results: Biopsies from 22 patients were inadequate for histological assessment, and 16 of these were considered to be cirrhotic from macroscopic observation. Out of 204 liver biopsies, 94 (46 %) were macroscopically identified as cirrhotic; 68/204 (33 %) showed stage 5 or 6 fibrosis (incomplete or complete cirrhosis). Histological understaging occurred mainly in patients who were otherwise diagnosed as having early Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, macroscopically incomplete cirrhosis and macronodular cirrhosis; 4/204 (2 %) of patients with cirrhosis histologically were understaged macroscopically.
Conclusions: Macroscopic evaluation during minilaparoscopy increases the sensitivity of detection of liver cirrhosis, compared with biopsy alone, by more than 30 %. Because of its minimal invasiveness, minilaparoscopy combined with biopsy is recommended as a superior method for the staging of chronic liver disease.

References

  • 1 Gambarin-Gelwan M, Wolf D C, Shapiro R. et al . Sensitivity of commonly available screening tests in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 1535-1538
  • 2 Schalm S W, Fattovich G, Brower J T. Therapy of hepatitis C: patients with cirrhosis.  Hepatology. 1997;  26 (Suppl. 1) 128S-132S
  • 3 Gaiani S, Gramantieri L, Venturoli N. et al . What is the criterion for differentiating chronic hepatitis from compensated cirrhosis? A prospective study comparing ultrasonography and percutaneous liver biopsy.  J Hepatol. 1997;  27 979-985
  • 4 Nord H J. Biopsy diagnosis of cirrhosis: blind percutaneous versus guided direct vision techniques. A review.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1982;  28 102-104
  • 5 Jeffers L J, Findor A, Thung S N. et al . Minimizing sampling error with laparoscopic guided liver biopsy of the right and left lobes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 A266
  • 6 Menghini G. One-second needle biopsy of the liver.  Gastroenterology. 1958;  35 190
  • 7 Lindner H. Grenzen und Gefahren der percutanen Leberbiopsie mit der Menghini Nadel.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967;  92 1751
  • 8 Vido I, Wildhirt E. Korrelation des laparoskopischen und histologischen Befundes bei chronischer Hepatitis und Leberzirrhose.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1969;  94 1633-1637
  • 9 Pagliaro L, Rinaldi F, Craxi A. et al . Percutaneous blind biopsy versus laparoscopy with guided biopsy in diagnosis of cirrhosis. A prospective, randomized trial.  Dig Dis Sci. 1983;  28 39-43
  • 10 Eposito C, Garipoli V, Vecchione R. et al . Laparoscopy-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of liver disorders in children.  Liver. 1997;  17 288-292
  • 11 Boyd W P, Nord H J. Diagnostic laparoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 189-197
  • 12 Saeian K, Reddy K R. Diagnostic laparascopy: an update.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 103-109
  • 13 Helmreich-Becker I, Meyer zum Büschenfelde K H, Lohse A W. Safety and feasibility of a new minimally invasive diagnostic laparoscopy technique.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 756-762
  • 14 Denzer U, Helmreich-Becker I, Mergener K. et al . Safety and value of minilaparoscopically guided liver biopsy in high risk patients.  Hepatology. 1999;  30 166A
  • 15 Nader A K, Jeffers L J, Reddy K R. et al . Small diameter (2 mm) laparoscope in the evaluation of liver disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 620-623
  • 16 Henning H, Look D. Laparoskopie. Atlas und Lehrbuch. Stuttgart; Thieme Verlag 1985: 32-46
  • 17 Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L. et al . Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis.  J Hepatol.. 1995;  22 696-699
  • 18 Poniachik J, Bernstein D E, Reddy R. et al . The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of cirrhosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 568-571
  • 19 Lock G, Knöll A, Hauer S. et al . Leberhistologie bei Hepatitis C: Korrelation mit verschiedenen biochemischen und virologischen Parametern.  Med Klinik. 2000;  95 603-607
  • 20 Saadeh S, Cammell G, Carey W D. et al . The role of liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis C.  Hepatology. 2001;  33 196-200
  • 21 Adamek H E, Maier M, Benz C. et al . Schwerwiegende Komplikationen der diagnostischen Laparoskopie.  Med Klinik. 1996;  91 694-697
  • 22 Schneider A RJ, Riemann J F, Arnold J C. Stellenwert der Minilaparoskopie im Vergleich zur konventionellen Laparoskopie in der Diagnostik von Lebererkrankungen - Zwischenergebnisse einer prospektiven, randomisierten Studie.  Z Gastroenterol. 2001;  39 15-18

A. W. Lohse, M.D.

I. Department of Medicine · Johannes Gutenberg University

Langenbeckstr. 1 · 55101 Mainz · Germany

Fax: + 49-6131-172728

Email: lohse@mail.uni-mainz.de

    >