Download PDF
Ultraschall Med 2003; 24(1): 40-44
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37411
Technik und Naturwissenschaft
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Nicht-thermische, nicht-kavitative Wirkungen von Ultraschall

Non-thermal Non-cavitational Effects of UltrasoundE.  Rosenfeld1
  • 1Fachhochschule Merseburg, FB Informatik und Angewandte Naturwissenschaften
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 February 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die nicht-thermischen, nicht-kavitativen (NTNC-) Effekte von medizinischem Ultraschall basieren im Wesentlichen auf den unmittelbaren und mittelbaren Wirkungen des Schallstrahlungsdruckes. Der Artikel führt in die Biophysik der zugrunde liegenden Mechanismen ein und beschreibt anhand ausgewählter Beispiele mögliche klinische Implikationen. Es kann festgestellt werden, dass durch NTNC-Wirkungen im Allgemeinen kein zusätzliches Sicherheitsrisiko bei der Anwendung von diagnostischem Ultraschall entsteht. Signifikante Wirkungen werden erst unter therapeutischen Expositionsbedingungen beobachtet. Die Frage, ob die Impulsdopplerverfahren als völlig harmlos gelten können, ist zur Zeit noch nicht abschließend zu beantworten. Auch die synergistischen Effekte von Ultraschall und Kontrastmitteln sind noch wenig untersucht.

Abstract

The non-thermal, non-cavitational (NTNC-) effects of medical ultrasound are based essentially on the direct and indirect effects of the sound radiation pressure. This article introduces the biophysics of the basic mechanisms and describes possible clinical implications using selected examples. It has been determined that generally no additional risks ensue through the effects of NTNC used purely for diagnostic purposes. Significant effects can only be detected under the conditions which prevail during therapeutic exposure. The question as to whether the pulse Doppler technique is completely harmless cannot be answered conclusively at this time. The synergetic effects between ultrasound and contrast media have not yet been examined thoroughly.

Literatur

  • 1 Barnett S B, ter Haar G R, Ziskin M C, Rott H D, Duck F A, Maeda K. International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;  26 355-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Koch C. Thermische Wirkungen von Ultraschall.  Ultraschall Med. 2001;  22 146-152
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jenne J. Kavitation in biologischem Gewebe.  Ultraschall Med. 2001;  22 200-207
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Beissner K. Die Schallstrahlungskraftmessung als Teil der Ultraschallexposimetrie.  Z Med Phys. 1997;  7 110-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Millner R (Hrsg). Wissensspeicher Ultraschalltechnik. Leipzig; Fachbuchverlag 1987: 121
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Gröschl M. Ultrasonic separation of suspended particles - Prt I: Fundamentals.  Acustica. 1998;  84 432-447
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 King L V. On the acoustic radiation pressure on spheres.  Proc Roy Soc London. 1934;  147 212-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Yosioka K, Kawasima Y. Acoustic radiation pressure on compressible spheres.  Acoustica. 1955;  5 167-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Brayman A A, Miller M W. Bubble cycling and standing waves in ultrasonic cell lyses.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1992;  18 411-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Miller D L, Williams A R. Nucleation and evolution of ultrasonic cavitation in a rotating exposure chamber.  J Ultrasound Med. 1992;  11 407-412
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Leighton T G, Walton A J, Pickworth M JW. Primary Bjerknes forces.  Eur J Phys. 1990;  11 47-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bjerkness V FK. Die Kraftfelder. Braunschweig; Vieweg und Sohn 1909
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Crum L A. Bjerknes forces on bubbles in astationary sound field.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1975;  57 1363-1371
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Weiser M AH, Apfel R E. Interparticle forces between two fluid speres in an acoustic field.  Acoustica. 1984;  56 114-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Zheng X, Apfel R E. Acoustic interaction forces between two fluid spheres in an acoustic field.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;  97 2218-2226
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nyborg W L. Theoretical criterion for acoustic aggregation.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989;  15 93-99
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nyborg W L. Acoustic streaming. In: Mason W (Ed) Physical acoustics. Vol IIB. New York; Academic Press Inc. 1965: 265-331
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Starritt H C, Hoad C L, Duck F A, Nassiri D K, Summers I R, Vennart W. Measurement of acoustic streaming using magnetic resonance.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;  26 321-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Liebermann L N. The second viscosity of liquids.  Phys Rev. 1949;  75 1415-1422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Starrit H, Duck F A, Humphrey V F. An experimental investigation of streaming in pulsed diagnostic ultrasound beams.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989;  15 363-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pohl P, Rosenfeld E, Millner R. Effects of Ultrasound on the steady-state transmembrane pH gradient and the Permeability of Acetic Acid through Bilayer Lipid.  Membranes Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;  1145 279-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pohl P, Antonenko Y A, Rosenfeld E. Effect of Ultrasound on the pH profiles in the unstirred layers near planar bilayer lipid membranes measured by microelectrodes.  Biochem Biophys Acta. 1993;  1152 155-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wu J, Winkler A J, O'Neill T P. Effect of acoustic streaming on ultrasound heating.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994;  20 195-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Barnett S B, ter Haar G R, Ziskin M C, Rott H D, Duck F A, Maeda K. International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;  26 355-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Barnett S B, ter Haar G R, Ziskin M C, Nyborg W L, Maeda K, Bang J. Current status of research on biophysical effects of ultrasound.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994;  20 205-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Goa L, Parker K, Lerner R, Levinson S. Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue - a review.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;  22 959-977
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nightingale K R, Nightingale R W, Palmeri M L, Trahey G F. A finite element model of remote palpation of breast lesions using radiation force: factors affecting tissue displacement.  Ultrason Imaging. 2000;  22 35-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gavrilov L R, Gersuni G V, Ilynski O B, Sirotyuk M G, Tsirunlnikov E M, Shehekanov E E. Use of focused ultrasound for stimulation of nerve structures.  Akust Zh. 1975;  21 318-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dalecki D, Raeman C H, Child S Z, Carstensen E L. Effects of pulsed ultrasound on the frogheart: III. The radiation force mechanism.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;  23 275-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gröschl M, Burger W, Handl B. Ultrasonic separation of suspended particles - Part III: Fundamentals.  Application in Biotechnology. 1998;  84 815-822
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Grundy M A, Bolek W E, Coakley W T, Benes E. Rapid agglutination testing in an ultrasonic standing wave.  Journal immunol methods. 1993;  165 47-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Thomas N E, Coakley W T. Measurement of antigen concentration by an ultrasound-enhanced latex immunoagglutination assay.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;  22 1277-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Dyson M, Pond J B, Woodward B, Broadbent J. The production of blood cell stasis and endothelial damage in the blood vessels of chick embryos treated with ultrasound in a stationary wave field.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1974;  1 133-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 ter Haar G, Wyard S J. Blood cell banding in ultrasonic standing waves.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1978;  4 111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Williams A R, Rosenfeld E H, Williams K A. Gelsectioning technique to evaluate phonophoresis in vitro.  Ultrasonics. 1990;  28 132-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lenart I, Ausländer D. The effect of ultrasound on diffusion through membranes.  Ultrasonics. 1980;  216-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Rosenfeld E, Pohl P, Salz H. Experimental investigations on the influence of acoustic streaming on membrane processes. In: Tagkagi K (Ed) Proc Ultrasonic World Congress. Yokohama; 1997: 470-471
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Schmidt P, Rosenfeld E, Millner R, Czerner R, Schellenberger A. Theoretical and experimental studies on the influence of ultrasound on immobilized enzymes.  Biotech Bioeng. 1987;  30 928-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Nightingale K R, Kornguth P J, Trahey G E. The Use of Acoustic Streaming in Breast Lesion Diagnosis - A Clinical-Study.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;  25 75-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lauer G L, Burge R, Tang D B, Bass B G, Gomez E R, Alving B M. Effect of ultrasound on tissue-type plasminogen activiator-induced thrombolysis.  Circulation. 1992;  86 1257-1264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Behrens S, Daffershofer M, Spiegel D, Hennerice M. Low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound accelerates thrombolysis through the skull.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;  25 269-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Riggs P N, Rancis C W, Bartos S R, Penney D P. Ultrasound enhancement of rabbit femoral artery thrombolysis.  Cardiovascular Surgery. 1997;  5 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Akiyama M, Ishibashi T, Yamada T, Furuhata H. Low-frequency ultrasound penetrates the cranium and enhances thrombolysis in vitro.  Neurosurgery. 1998;  43 828-833
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rosenfeld E, Romanowski U, Williams A R. Positive and negative effects of diagnostic intensities of ultrasound on erythrocyte blood group markers.  Ultrasonics. 1990;  28 155-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Miller D L, Lamore B J, Boraker D K. Lack of effect of pulsed ultrasound on AB0 antigens of human erythrocyte in vitro.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1986;  12 209-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Pohl E, Rosenfeld E, Pohl P, Millner R. Effects of Ultrasound on Agglutination and Aggregation of Human Erythrocytes in vitro.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;  21 711-719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hart J. The use of ultrasound therapy in wound healing.  J Wound Care. 1998;  7 25-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 ter Haar G. Therapeutic ultrasound.  Europ J Ultrasound. 1999;  9 3-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Sakamoto S, Watanabe Y. Effects of existence of microbubbles for increase of acoustic streaming.  Jpn J Appl Phys. 1999;  38 3050-3052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. Dr. E. Rosenfeld

Fachhochschule Merseburg · FB Informatik und Angewandte Naturwissenschaften

Geusaer Straße · 06217 Merseburg

Email: eike.rosenfeld@in.fh-merseburg.de

      >