Sex Allocation in a Long-Lived Monocarpic Plant

Abstract

Hermaphroditic plants with perfect flowers often show within-inflorescence flower differentiation, lower female success (and therefore female investment) as the inflorescence develops, and size-dependent sex allocation to male and female functions. Here, I present the results of a descriptive and experimental study in the long-lived monocarpic Saxifraga longifolia, a sequentially blooming plant showing a large variation in the size of the inflorescence. Natural patterns of relative investment in male and female reproductive components were explored, and flowers were removed from different positions, in order to test two models on sex allocation which predict that female investment increases with resource availability. Results of this study agree with this prediction at the flower level (within inflorescences), but not at the plant level. Pre- and post-mating female allocation declined from early to late-position flowers, while the pollen : ovule increased. Removal of flowers indicated that architectural effects do not prevent full compensation for overall seed production, although the participation of terminal flowers in female reproduction was low in most cases. There seem to be some ontogenic differences in specialization among early- and late-produced flowers, so that the progressive maleness over time is reinforced after fertilization by a sink-source effect, possibly combined with selective abortion. Overall seed production was significantly correlated with plant size; nevertheless, female success was not maximum for the largest plants, but for intermediate sized plants.

Flower position - reproductive success - functional gender - resource translocation - non-fruiting flowers

References

• 1 Aker Ch. L.. Regulation of flower, fruit and seed production by a monocarpic perennial, Yucca whipplei. .  Journal of Ecology. (1982);  70 357-372
• 2 Ashman T.-L., Hitchens M. S.. Dissecting the causes of variation in intra-inflorescence allocation in a sexually polymorphic species, Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae).  American Journal of Botany. (2000);  87 197-204
• 3 Bawa K. S., Webb C. J.. Floral variation and sexual differentiation in Muntingia calabura (Elaeocarpaceae), a species with hermaphrodite flowers.  Evolution. (1983);  37 1271-1282
• 4 Brunet J.. Male reproductive success and variation in fruit and seed set in Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae).  Ecology. (1996);  77 2458-2471
• 5 Brunet J., Charlesworth D.. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants.  Evolution. (1995);  49 70-79
• 6 Burd M.. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set.  Botanical Review. (1994);  60 83-139
• 7 Burd M.. “Excess” flower production and selective fruit abortion: a model of potential benefits.  Ecology. (1998);  79 2123-2132
• 8 Campbell D. R.. Inflorescence size: test of the male function hypothesis.  American Journal of Botany. (1989);  76 730-738
• 9 Campbell D. R., Halama K. J.. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population.  Ecology. (1993);  74 1043-1051
• 10 Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B.. Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites.  Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. (1981);  15 57-74
• 11 Charnov E. L.. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton NJ; Princeton University Press (1982)
• 12 de Jong T. J., Klinkhamer P. G. L.. Size-dependency of sex-allocation in hermaphroditic, monocarpic plants.  Functional Ecology. (1989);  3 201-206
• 13 Devlin B., Stephenson A. G.. Sexual variation among plants of a perfect-flowered species.  American Naturalist. (1987);  130 199-218
• 14 Diggle P. K.. Architectural effects and the interpretation of patterns of fruit and seed development.  Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. (1995);  26 531-552
• 15 Dudash M. R.. Variation in pollen limitation among individuals of Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae).  Ecology. (1993);  74 959-962
• 16 Ehrlén J.. Proximate limits to seed production in a herbaceous perennial legume, Lathyrus vernus. .  Ecology. (1992);  73 1820-1831
• 17 Goldman D. A., Willson M. F.. Sex allocation in functionally hermaphroditic plants: a review and critique.  The Botanical Review. (1986);  52 157-194
• 18 Ishii H. S., Sakai S.. Temporal variation in floral display and individual floral sex allocation in racemes of Narthecium asiaticum (Liliaceae).  Americal Journal of Botany. (2002);  89 441-446
• 19 Janzen D. H.. A note on optimal mate selection by plants.  American Naturalist. (1977);  111 365-371
• 20 Klinkhamer P. G. L., de Jong T. J.. Plant size and seed production in the monocarpic perennial Cynoglossum officinale .  L. New Phytologist. (1987);  106 773-783
• 21 Klinkhamer P. G. L., de Jong T. J.. Size-dependent allocation to male and female reproduction. Bazzaz, F. A. and Grace, J., eds. Plant resource allocation. San Diego; Academic Press (1997): 211-229
• 22 Lloyd D. G.. Sexual strategies in plants.  I. An hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive session. New Phytologist. (1980);  86 69-79
• 23 Lloyd D. G., Bawa K. S.. Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions.  Evolutionary Biology. (1984);  17 255-336
• 24 Mazer S. J., Dawson K. A.. Size-dependent sex allocation within flowers of the annual herb Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae): ontogenetic and among-plant variation.  American Journal of Botany. (2001);  88 819-831
• 25 Montalvo A. M., Ackerman J. D.. Limitations to fruit production in Ionopsis utricularioides (Orchidaceae).  Biotropica. (1987);  19 24-31
• 26 Nicholls M. S.. Spatial pattern of ovule maturation in the inflorescence of Echium vulgare: demography, resource allocation and the constraints of architecture.  Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society. (1987);  31 247-256
• 27 Obeso J. R.. Selective fruit and seed maturation in Asphodelus albus Miller (Liliaceae).  Oecologia. (1993);  93 564-570
• 28 Ross M.. Sexual asymmetry in hermaphroditic plants.  Trends in Ecology and Evolution. (1990);  5 43-47
• 29 Stephenson A. G.. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions.  Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. (1981);  12 253-279
• 30 Stephenson A. G., Winsor J. A.. Lotus corniculatus regulates offspring quality through selective fruit abortion.  Evolution. (1986);  40 453-458
• 31 Stöcklin J., Favre P.. Effects of plant size and morphological constraints on variation in reproductive components in two related species of Epilobium. .  Journal of Ecology. (1994);  82 735-746
• 32 Sutherland S.. Patterns of fruit-set: what controls fruit-flower ratios in plants?.  Evolution. (1986);  40 117-128
• 33 Thomson J. D.. Deployment of ovules and pollen among flowers within inflorescences.  Evolutionary Trends in Plants. (1989);  3 65-68
• 34 Vaughton G.. Nonrandom patterns of fruit set in Banksia spinulosa (Proteaceae): interovary competition within and among inflorescences.  International Journal of Plant Sciences. (1993);  154 306-313
• 35 Webb D. A., Gornall R. J.. Saxifrages of Europe. Kent, U. K.; Christopher Helm Pub. (1989)
• 36 Wright S. I., Barret C. H.. Size-dependent gender modification in a hermaphroditic perennial herb.  Proceedings of the Royal Society of London series B. (1999);  266 225-232
• 37 Wyatt R.. Inflorescence architecture: how flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit set.  American Journal of Botany. (1982);  69 585-594
• 38 Zimmerman M., Pyke G. H.. Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set.  American Naturalist. (1988);  131 723-738

Section Editor: G. Gottsberger