Endoscopy 2003; 35(8): 659-662
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41512
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic Hemoclipping Using a Transparent Cap in Technically Difficult Cases

J.  I.  Kim1 , S.  S.  Kim1 , S.  Park1 , J.  Han1 , J.  K.  Kim1 , S.  W.  Han1 , K.  Y.  Choi1 , I.  S.  Chung1 , K.  W.  Chung1 , H.  S.  Sun1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 1 July 2002

Accepted after Revision 13 March 2003

Publication Date:
20 August 2003 (online)

Background and Study Aims: Technical difficulties have been experienced in endoscopic hemoclipping on the posterior wall of the body of the stomach because the angle of approach is tangential. It has been suggested that the use of a transparent cap on the tip of the endoscope could help to solve this problem. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of endoscopic hemoclipping using a transparent cap over the tip of the endoscope.
Patients and Methods: A total of 74 patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer or stigmata of recent hemorrhage underwent endoscopic hemoclipping. Technical difficulty in hemoclipping was experienced in 18 patients and the transparent cap was used in these cases. We therefore conducted a nonrandomized prospective study to compare bleeding control with the hemoclip with and without the aid of a transparent cap.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the patients treated with the cap and those treated without the cap with regard to the initial hemostasis rate (94.4 % vs. 91.1 %), the rebleeding rate (11.7 % vs. 11.8 %), or the permanent hemostasis rate (94.4 % vs. 96.4 %).
Conclusions: Although there was no statistically significant difference between patients treated with or without a transparent cap, hemoclipping with the aid of the cap made it possible to clip a lesion too tangential to be clipped without it. However, this study did not compare conventional hemoclipping with hemoclipping using a cap because the cap was only used in cases in which conventional clipping had failed.

References

  • 1 Nagayama K, Tazawa J, Sakai Y. et al . Efficacy of endoscopic clipping for bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer: comparison with topical ethanol injection.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 2897-2901
  • 2 Fuke H, Sato H, Saito K. et al . Benefits and limitations of endoscopic hemostasis for upper gastrointestinal bleeding with clipping and gelfoam (in Japanese).  Gastroenterol Endosc. 1996;  38 1993-1998
  • 3 Cook D J, Cuyatt G H, Salena B J, Laine L A. Endoscopic therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.  Gastroenterology. 1992;  102 139-148
  • 4 Chung I K, Sung J R, Lee T Y. et al . Hemostatic effect of endoscopic hemoclip method, hypertonic saline epinephrine injection method and their combined method for bleeding peptic ulcer.  Kor J Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  17 335-345
  • 5 Chung S S, Lau J Y, Sung J J. et al . Randomized comparison between adrenaline injection alone and adrenaline injection plus heat probe treatment for actively bleeding ulcers.  BMJ. 1997;  314 1307-1311
  • 6 Qvist P, Arnese K E, Jacobsen C D, Rosseland A R. Endoscopic treatment and restrictive surgical policy in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding. Five years experience in a central hospital.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;  29 569-576
  • 7 James Y W, Joseph J Y, Lam Y H. et al . Endoscopic retreatment compared with surgery in patients with recurrent bleeding after initial endoscopic control of bleeding ulcers.  N Eng J Med. 1999;  340 751-756
  • 8 Ko J H, Lee K J, Jeoung S T. et al . Comparison of various endoscopic injection therapies and hemoclipping for bleeding peptic ulcers.  Kor J Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  18 817-824
  • 9 Binmoeller K F, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Endoscopic hemoclip treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 167-170
  • 10 Villanueva C, Balanzo J, Torras X. et al . Value of second-look endoscopy after injection therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer: a prospective and randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 34-39
  • 11 Choudari C P, Rajgopal C, Palmer K R. Comparison of endoscopic injection therapy versus the heater probe in major peptic ulcer hemorrhage.  Gut. 1992;  33 1159-1161
  • 12 Pulanic R, Vucelic B, Rosandic M. et al . Comparison of injection sclerotherapy and laser photocoagulation for bleeding peptic ulcers.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 291-297
  • 13 Laine L. Multipolar electrocoagulation versus injection therapy in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers: a prospective randomized trial.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  99 1303-1306
  • 14 Hachisu T, Yamada H, Satoh S. et al . Endoscopic clipping with a new rotatable clip-device and a long clip.  Dig Endosc. 1996;  8 127-133
  • 15 Hachisu T. Evaluation of endoscopic hemostasis using an improved clipping apparatus.  Surg Endosc. 1988;  2 13-17

I. S. Chung, M. D.

Kang Nam St. Mary's Hospital

53 Banpo-dong · Seocho-gu · Seoul 137-040 · South Korea

Fax: + 82-2-3779-1331

Email: isc@cmc.cuk.ac.kr

    >