An Effective Sialylation Method Using N-Troc- and N-Fmoc-protected β-Thiophenyl Sialosides and Application to the One-pot Two-step Synthesis of 2,6-Sialyl-T Antigen

Masaatsu Adachi; Hiroshi Tanaka; Takashi Takahashi

doi:10.1055/s-2004-817759

RSS-Feed abonnieren

Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000083.xml

Teilen / Bookmarken

Facebook X Linkedin Weibo

PDF herunterladen

Synlett 2004(4): 609-614
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-817759

LETTER

An Effective Sialylation Method Using N-Troc- and N-Fmoc-protected β-Thiophenyl Sialosides and Application to the One-pot Two-step Synthesis of 2,6-Sialyl-T Antigen

Masaatsu Adachi, Hiroshi Tanaka, Takashi Takahashi*
Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan
Fax: +81(3)57342884; e-Mail: thiroshi@apc.titech.ac.jp;

Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 4 December 2003
Publikationsdatum:
10. Februar 2004 (online)

Abstract
Volltext
Referenzen

Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

We describe an efficient sialylation method using β-thiosialosides with various N-protecting groups. Modification of the C-5 amino group of β-thiosialosides into N-Fmoc and N-Troc derivatives enhanced their reactivity in glycosidation. In addition, a minimum amount of MS-3 Å was effective to improve the yield of α-linked sialoside. Branched type one-pot glycosylation initiating glycosidation of the N-Troc-protected β-thiophenyl sialoside at a primary alcohol provided the protected 2,6-sialyl-T antigen in good yield, which was converted to the fully deprotected glycosyl amino acid.

Key words

sialic acids - one-pot glycosylation - glycopeptides - glycosyl amino acids - thioglycosides

References

1a Gottschalk A. Nature (London, U. K.) 1951, 167: 845

Crossref Google Scholar
1b Sialic Acids: Chemistry, Methabolism and Function Vol. 10: Schauer R. Springer-Verlag; Wien-New York: 1982.

Crossref Google Scholar
1c Suzuki Y. Nagano Y. Kato H. Matsumoto M. Nerome K. Nakajima K. Nobusaka E. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261: 17057

Crossref Google Scholar
1d Varki A. Glycobiology 1993, 3: 97

Crossref Google Scholar
1e Biology of Sialic Acids Rosenberg A. Plenum Press; New York, London: 1995.

Crossref Google Scholar
1f Angata T. Varki A. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102: 439

Crossref Google Scholar
2a Fukuda M. Carlsson SR. Klock JC. Dell A. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261: 12796

Google Scholar
2b Hull SR. Bright A. Carraway KL. Abe M. Hayes DF. Kufe DW. Cancer Commun. 1989, 1: 261

Google Scholar
2c Saitoh O. Gallagher RE. Fukuda M. Cancer Res. 1991, 51: 2854

Google Scholar
3a Kurosawa A. Kitagawa H. Fukui S. Numata Y. Nakada H. Funakoshi I. Kawasaki T. Ogawa T. Iijima H. Yamashita I. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263: 8724

Google Scholar
3b Itzkowitz SH. Yuan M. Montgomery CK. Kjeldsen T. Takahashi HK. Bigbee WL. Kim YS. Cancer Res. 1989, 49: 197

Google Scholar
3c Toyokuni T. Singhal AK. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995, 24: 137

Google Scholar
For recent review of glycopeptide synthesis, see:
4a Meldal M. St Hilaire PM. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1: 552

Crossref Google Scholar
4b Herzner H. Reipen T. Schultz M. Kunz H. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100: 4495

Crossref Google Scholar
4c St Hilaire PM. Meldal M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39: 1162

Crossref Google Scholar
4d Macmillan D. Bertozzi CR. Tetrahedron 2000, 56: 9515

Crossref Google Scholar
4e Seitz O. ChemBioChem 2000, 1: 214

Crossref Google Scholar
4f Seitz O. Heinemann I. Mattes A. Waldmann H. Tetrahedron 2001, 57: 2247

Crossref Google Scholar
4g Davis BG. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102: 579

Crossref Google Scholar
4h Brocke C. Kunz H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10: 3085

Crossref Google Scholar
4i Marcaurelle LA. Bertozzi CR. Glycobiology 2002, 12: 69R

Crossref Google Scholar
5a Takahashi T. Tsukamoto H. Yamada H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38: 8223

Google Scholar
5b Takahashi T. Tsukamoto H. Yamada H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1: 1885

Google Scholar
5c For review of glycosidation of sialic acid, see: Okamoto K. Goto T. Tetrahedron 1990, 46: 5835

Google Scholar
5d DeNinno MP. Synthesis 1991, 583

Google Scholar
5e Ito Y. Gaudino JJ. Paulson JC. Pure Appl. Chem. 1993, 65: 753

Google Scholar
5f Boons G.-J. Demchenko AV. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100: 4539

Google Scholar
5g Halcomb RL. Cappell MD. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2002, 21: 723

Google Scholar
6 Bochkov AF. Zaikov GE. Chemistry of the Glycosidic Bond Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1979.

Google Scholar
7a Demchenko AV. Boons G.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39: 3065

Google Scholar
7b Demchenko AV. Boons G.-J. Chem.-Eur. J. 1999, 5: 1278

Google Scholar
8a Yu C.-S. Niikura K. Lin C.-C. Wong C.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40: 2900

Crossref Google Scholar
8b Mukaiyama T. Mandai H. Jona H. Chem. Lett. 2002, 1182

Crossref Google Scholar
9a Komba S. Galustian C. Ishida H. Feizi T. Kannagi R. Kiso M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38: 1131

Crossref Google Scholar
9b Komba S. Yamaguchi M. Ishida H. Kiso M. Biol. Chem. 2001, 382: 223

Crossref Google Scholar
9c Meo CD. Demchenko AV. Boons G.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66: 5490

Crossref Google Scholar
9d Meo CD. Demchenko AV. Boons G.-J. Aust. J. Chem. 2002, 55: 131

Crossref Google Scholar
11 Marra A. Sinäy P. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 187: 35

Crossref Google Scholar
12a Sugita T. Higuchi R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37: 2613

Google Scholar
12b Sugita T. Kan Y. Nagaregawa Y. Miyamoto T. Higuchi R. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1997, 16: 917

Google Scholar
13a Paguet A. Can. J. Chem. 1982, 60: 976

Artikel in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
13b Lapatsanis L. Milias G. Froussios K. Kolovos M. Synthesis 1983, 671

Artikel in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
14 Byramova NE. Tuzikov AB. Bovin NV. Carbohydr. Res. 1992, 237: 161

Crossref Google Scholar
15 Hasegawa A. Nagahama T. Ohki H. Hotta K. Ishida H. Kiso M. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1991, 10: 493

Crossref Google Scholar
16a Konradsson P. Udodong U. Fraser-Reid B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31: 4313

Crossref Google Scholar
16b Veeneman GH. van Leeuwen SH. van Boom JH. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31: 1331

Crossref Google Scholar
17 Glycosidation of the N-Troc-protected β-thiophenyl sialoside 2f with a primary alcohol has already been reported. However, in this report, improvement of the yield in glycosidation was not noted. See: Ren C.-T. Chen C.-S. Wu S.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 1376

Crossref Google Scholar
18a Dabrowski U. Friebolin H. Brossmer R. Supp M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20: 4637

Crossref Google Scholar
18b Paulsen H. Tietz H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21: 927

Crossref Google Scholar
20 Ando H. Koike Y. Ishida H. Kiso M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44: 6883

Crossref Google Scholar
21 Seeberger PH. Haase W.-C. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100: 4349

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
22 Raghavan S. Kahne D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115: 1580

Crossref Google Scholar
23a Yamada H. Harada T. Miyazaki H. Takahashi T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35: 3979

Crossref Google Scholar
23b Yamada H. Harada T. Takahashi T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116: 7919

Crossref Google Scholar
23c Yamada H. Kato T. Takahashi T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40: 4581

Crossref Google Scholar
24 Douglas NL. Ley SL. Lücking UL. Warriner SL. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 51

Crossref Google Scholar
25 Zang Z. Ollmann IR. Ye X.-S. Wischnat R. Baasov T. Wong C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121: 734

Crossref Google Scholar
26a Yamada H. Takimoto H. Ikeda T. Tsukamoto H. Harada T. Takahashi T. Synlett 2001, 1751

Crossref Google Scholar
26b Tanaka H. Adachi M. Tsukamoto H. Ikeda T. Yamada H. Takahashi T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4: 4213 ; and references therein

Crossref Google Scholar
27 Takahashi T. Adachi M. Matsuda A. Doi T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 2599

Crossref Google Scholar
28a Iijima H. Ogawa T. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 186: 95

Artikel in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
28b Qiu D. Gandhi SS. Koganty RR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37: 595

Artikel in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
28c Sames D. Chen X.-T. Danishefsky SJ. Nature (London) 1997, 389: 587

Artikel in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
28d Schwarz JB. Kuduk SD. Chen X.-T. Sames D. Glunz PW. Danishefsky SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121: 2662

Artikel in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
28e Brocke C. Kunz H. Synlett 2003, 2052

Artikel in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
For the related approaches using GalNAcα(1→3)-Ser or -Thr derivatives as building blocks, see:
29a Nakahara Y. Iijima H. Ogawa T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35: 3321

Crossref Google Scholar
29b Liebe B. Kunz H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35: 8777

Crossref Google Scholar
29c Meinjohanns E. Meldal M. Paulsen H. Schleyer A. Bock K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 985

Crossref Google Scholar
29d Liebe B. Kunz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 36: 2830

Crossref Google Scholar
29e Chen X.-T. Sames D. Danishefsky SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120: 7760

Crossref Google Scholar
34a Matsumoto T. Maeta H. Suzuki K. Tsuchihashi G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29: 2567

Google Scholar
34b Suzuki K. Maeta H. Matsumoto T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 3029: 4853

Google Scholar
35 Windholz TB. Johnston DBR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 8: 2555

Crossref Google Scholar

10

We have reported a preliminary result of the sialylation in 83rd Spring Meeting (Tokyo) in 2002 of Japan Chemical Society (3D1-12).

19

Selected ¹H NMR assignment of disaccharide 4e-g: For 4e-α-isomer: H-3eq (δ = 2.70 ppm), H-4 (δ = 4.90 ppm), J _7,8 = 9.2 Hz, Δδ{H-9′-H-9} = 0.31 ppm. For 4e-β-isomer: H-3eq (δ = 2.54 ppm), H-4 (δ = 5.21 ppm), J _7,8 = 8.7 Hz, Δδ{H-9′-H-9} = 0.93 ppm. For 4f-α-isomer: H-3eq (δ = 2.72 ppm), H-4 (δ = 4.98 ppm), Δδ{H-9′-H-9} = 0.27 ppm. For 4f-β-isomer: H-3eq (δ = 2.54 ppm), H-4 (δ = 5.25 ppm), J _7,8 = 4.8 Hz, Δδ{H-9′-H-9} = 0.91 ppm. For 4g-α-isomer: H-3eq (δ = 2.70 ppm), H-4 (δ = 4.99 ppm), J _7,8 = 8.8 Hz, Δδ{H-9′-H-9} = 0.30 ppm. For 4g-β-isomer: H-3eq (δ = 2.45 ppm), H-4 (δ = 5.21 ppm), Δδ{H-9′-H-9} = 0.91 ppm.

30

The α/β ratio was determined by HPLC analysis based on refractive index detection (Eluent: hexane/2-propanol = 90:10, 3.0 mL/min; Retention time: α-isomer 10.7 min, β-isomer 11.7 min). The anomeric configuration of disaccharide 8 was determined by ¹H NMR measurement of the isolated isomers according to empirical rule.

31

Analytical data of 8: For 8-α: [α]_D ²¹ +43.4 (c 1.00, CHCl₃). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.30-7.60 (m, 15 H, aromatic), 5.89 (d, 1 H, Ser-NH, J = 8.3 Hz), 5.40 (ddd, 1 H, Neu-H-8), 5.36 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-7, J _6,7 = 1.4 Hz, J _7,8 = 8.8 Hz), 5.35 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 12.2 Hz), 5.14 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 12.6 Hz), 5.11 (d × 2, 2 H), 5.00 (br dd, 1 H, Neu-H-4, J _3ax,4 = 4.9 Hz, J _3eq,4 = 10.8 Hz), 4.94 (d, 1 H, Neu-Troc-NH, J = 10.3 Hz), 4.90 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 12.2 Hz), 4.79 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 11.7 Hz), 4.78 (d, 1 H, GalNAc-H-1, J _1,2 = 3.4 Hz), 4.65 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 11.2 Hz), 4.60 (m, 1 H, Ser-α), 4.36 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 12.2 Hz), 4.24 (d, 1 H, Neu-H-9′, J _8,9’ = 1.9 Hz, J _gem = 12.7 Hz), 4.16 (br d, 1 H, Neu-H-6, J = 10.8 Hz), 4.06 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-9, J _8,9 = 4.9 Hz, J _gem = 12.7 Hz), 3.91-4.01 (m, 3 H, GalNAc-H-6′, Ser-β), 3.79-3.85 (m, 3 H, GalNAc-H-3, H-4, H-6), 3.65-3.69 (m, 4 H, Neu-H-5, OMe), 3.52 (br dd, 1 H, GalNAc-H-5), 3.36 (dd, 1 H, GalNAc-H-2, J _1,2 = 3.0 Hz, J _2,3 = 10.3 Hz), 2.66 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-3eq, J _3eq,4 = 4.9 Hz, J _gem = 13.2 Hz), 2.25 (d, 1 H, GalNAc-H-3, OH, J = 8.8 Hz), 1.97, 2.00, 2.09, 2.11 (4 s, 12 H, Ac), 1.92 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-3ax, J _3ax,4 = 10.8 Hz). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 172.0, 170.7, 170.5, 169.8, 166.6, 156.0, 154.5, 138.0, 136.0, 134.9, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 127.8, 98.7, 98.2, 95.5, 77.9, 77.2, 75.4, 74.4, 72.3, 71.8, 70.7, 69.2, 68.4, 68.2, 68.1, 67.9, 67.2, 63.3, 62.7, 60.4, 53.8, 52.7, 50.9, 37.0, 20.9, 20.8, 20.7, 20.6. IR (KBr): 3347, 2534, 2109, 1745, 1523, 1369, 1218, 1038, 738, 738, 698 cm^-1. Anal. Calcd for C₅₂H₆₀Cl₃N₅O₂₂: C, 41.47; H, 4.98; N, 5.77. Found: C, 51.03; H, 5.02; N, 5.47. For 8-β: [α]_D ²² +37.5 (c 1.00, CHCl₃). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.30-7.39 (m, 15 H, aromatic), 6.36 (d, 1 H, Ser-NH, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.22 (d, 1 H, Neu-Troc-NH, J = 10.3 Hz), 5.54 (ddd, 1 H, Neu-H-4, J _3ax,4 = 12.2 Hz, J _3eq,4 = 4.4 Hz), 5.47 (br s, 1 H, Neu-H-7), 5.37 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 13.9 Hz), 5.34 (m, 1 H, Neu-H-8), 5.12 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 13.9 Hz), 5.11 (d × 2, 2 H), 4.96 (br d, 1 H, Neu-H-9′, J = 11.2 Hz), 4.89 (d, 1 H, GalNAc-H-1, J _1,2 = 2.9 Hz), 4.76 (m, 1 H, Ser-α), 4.75 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 12.2 Hz), 4.69 (d × 2, 2 H), 4.53 (d, 1 H, J _gem = 11.7 Hz), 4.10 (m, 1 H, Ser-β′), 4.03 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-9, J _8,9 = 8.8 Hz, J _gem = 12.7 Hz), 3.94 (m, 2 H, Neu-H-6, GalNAc-H-5), 3.62 (m, 9 H, Neu-H-5, OMe, GalNAc-H-3, H-4, H-6′, H-6, Ser-β), 3.36 (dd, 1 H, GalNAc-H-2, J _1,2 = 2.9 Hz, J _2,3 = 10.8 Hz), 2.51 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-3eq, J _3eq,4 = 4.4 Hz, J _gem = 13.9 Hz), 1.96 (d, 1 H, GalNAc-H-3-OH), 1.91, 1.97 × 2, 2.01 (3 s, 12 H, Ac), 1.83 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-3ax, J _3ax,4 = 12.2 Hz). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 170.7, 170.3, 170.0, 169.8, 169.7, 167.7, 156.0, 154.0, 138.0, 156.0, 138.0, 136.1, 135.1, 128.5, 128.5, 128.1, 128.0, 128.0, 127.8, 99.3, 98.4, 95.3, 76.6, 75.1, 74.4, 71.9, 69.6, 69.1, 68.3, 68.0, 67.9, 67.5, 67.3, 67.0, 63.0, 62.2, 60.8, 54.4, 52.8, 51.4, 37.7, 21.0, 20.8, 20.7, 20.6. IR (KBr): 3368, 2955, 2110, 1744, 1530, 1370, 1223, 1036, 944, 736, 696 cm^-1.

32

The α/β ratio was determined by HPLC analysis based on refractive index detection (Eluent: hexane/2-propanol = 95:5, 3.0 mL/min; Retention time: α-isomer 12.9 min, β-isomer 16.1 min).

33

Selected analytical data of 10: For α-sialoside 10 (α-isomer): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 5.61 (dd, 1 H, Gal-H-2, J _1,2 = 3.4 Hz, J _2,3 = 10.3 Hz), 5.55 (d, 1 H, Gal-H-1, J _1,2 = 3.4 Hz). For α-sialoside 10 (β-isomer): [α]_D ²¹ +23.8 (c 1.36, CHCl₃). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 8.05 (d, 2 H, aromatic), 7.13-7.57 (m, 33 H, aromatic), 5.74 (dd, 1 H, Gal-H-2, J _1,2 = 7.3 Hz, J _2,3 = 8.2 Hz), 5.74 (d, 1 H, Ser-NH, J = 6.8 Hz), 5.39 (m, 1 H, Neu-H-8), 5.35 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-7, J _6,7 < 1 Hz, J _7,8 = 8.3 Hz), 5.09-5.17 (m, 4 H), 5.05 (d, 1 H, J = 11.2 Hz), 4.97 (ddd, 1 H, Neu-H-4, J _3ax,4 = 12.2 Hz, J _3aq,4 = 4.9 Hz, J _4,5 = 9.6 Hz), 4.94 (d, 1 H, J = 11.7 Hz), 4.90 (d, 1 H, J = 12.7 Hz), 4.87 (d, 1 H, J = 10.8 Hz), 4.77 (d, 1 H, Gal-H-1, J _1,2 = 7.8 Hz), 4.69 (d, 1 H, GalNAc-H-1, J _1,2 = 3.4 Hz), 4.67 (d, 1 H, J = 12.2 Hz), 4.61 (d, 1 H, J = 11.2 Hz), 4.58 (d, 1 H, J = 11.7 Hz), 4.56 (m, 1 H, Ser-α), 4.53 (d, 1 H, J = 12.7 Hz), 4.46 (d, 1 H, J = 12.2 Hz), 4.45 (d, 1 H, J = 12.2 Hz), 4.29 (br dd, 1 H, Neu-H-9′, J _gem = 11.2 Hz), 4.14 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-9, J _8,9 = 4.9 Hz, J _gem = 11.2 Hz), 4.13 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-6, J _5,6 = 9.8 Hz, J _6,7 < 1 Hz), 4.05 (br dd, 1 H, Gal-H-4), 3.89-3.99 (m, 4 H, Ser-β, Gal-H-3, H-6′), 3.67-3.69 (m, 6 H, GalNAc-H-4, H-6, Gal-H-3, H-5, H-6, H-6′), 3.59-3.64 (m, 4 H, Neu-H-5, OMe), 3.50 (dd, 1 H, GalNAc-H-2, J _1,2 = 3.0 Hz, J _2,3 = 11.2 Hz), 3.20 (ddd, 1 H, GalNAc-H-5, J = 4.9 Hz, J = 9.3 Hz), 2.56 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-3eq, J _3eq,4 = 9.3 Hz, J _gem = 12.7 Hz), 1.97, 1.99, 2.07, 2.11 (4 s, 12 H, Ac), 1.84 (dd, 1 H, Neu-H-3ax, J _3ax,4 = 12.2 Hz). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 170.6, 170.3, 170.1, 169.8, 169.6, 169.6, 167.7, 165.3, 156.0, 154.0, 138.6, 138.5, 137.7, 137.6, 136.2, 135.1, 132.8, 132.8, 130.2, 129.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7, 127.6, 127.4, 127.3, 102.6, 99.3, 98.4, 95.4, 79.7, 77.2, 76.8, 75.3, 74.5, 74.4, 74.3, 73.6, 73.4, 72.6, 72.1, 72.0, 71.8, 69.8, 68.7, 68.6, 68.4, 68.3, 67.5, 67.1, 63.8, 62.1, 59.4, 54.5, 52.7, 51.5, 37.7, 21.0, 20.7, 20.7. IR (KBr): 3347, 2952, 2109, 1745, 1520, 1454, 1218, 1040, 737, 698 cm^-1.

36

Analytical data for 1a: [α]_D ²⁶ +67.0 (c 0.16, H₂O). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, D₂O, 303 K): δ = 4.88 (d, 1 H, GalNAc-H-1, J _1,2 = 3.9 Hz), 4.43 (d, 1 H, Gal-H-1, J _1,2 = 7.8 Hz), 4.31 (dd, 1 H, GalNAc-H-2, J _1,2 = 3.4 Hz, J _2,3 = 11.2 Hz), 4.22 (br d, GalNAc-H-4, J = 2.9 Hz), 4.10 (dd, 1 H, Ser-β′, J _α, _β _′ = 2.4 Hz, J _gem = 10.7 Hz), 4.04 (dd, 1 H, GalNAc-H-3, J _2,3 = 11.2 Hz, J _3,4 = 2.9 Hz), 4.01 (m, 1 H, GalNAc-H-5), 3.97 (dd, 1 H, Ser-α, J _α, _β _′ = 2.4 Hz, J _α, _β = 4.9 Hz), 3.90 (dd, 1 H, Ser-β, J _α, _β = 4.9 Hz, J _gem = 10.7 Hz), 3.61-3.88 (12 H, Neu5Ac-H-4,5,6,7,8,9′,9, GalNAc-H-6′,6, Gal-H-5,6′), 3.58 (dd, 1 H, Gal-H-3, J _2,3 = 10.3 Hz, J _3,4 = 3.9 Hz), 3.55 (dd, 1 H, Gal-H-6, J _5,6 = 1.0 Hz, J _gem = 10.3 Hz), 3.48 (dd, 1 H, Gal-H-2, J _1,2 = 7.8 Hz, J _2,3 = 10.3 Hz), 2.70 (dd, 1 H, Neu5Ac-H-3eq, J _3eq,4 = 4.9 Hz, J _gem = 12.7 Hz), 2.00, 2.01 (2 s, 6 H, Ac), 1.65 (dd, 1 H, Neu5Ac-H-3ax, J _3ax,4 = 12.2 Hz). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, D₂O, acetone-d ₆): δ = 175.8, 175.4, 173.9, 172.0, 105.5, 100.9, 99.1, 77.4, 75.8, 73.5, 73.4, 72.4, 71.4, 70.3, 69.4, 69.3, 69.7, 68.9, 67.3, 64.6, 63.5, 61.8, 54.8, 52.6, 49.2, 40.9, 22.9 × 2. IR (KBr): 3330, 1641, 1572, 1393, 1121, 1055, 930, 669 cm^-1. MS (ESI-TOF): Calcd for C₂₈H₄₇N₃O₂₁Na [M + Na]⁺ 784.3; found: 784.3.