Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care 2004; 12(3): 121-129
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-822776
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Modern Concepts of Intramedullary Nailing of the Humerus

J. Blum1 , P. M. Rommens1
  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 September 2004 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The last ten years have shown that intramedullary nailing is not just limited to the femoral and tibial fractures, but is also very appropriate in humeral fractures. Basic ideas for humeral nailing are less invasive approaches to the humerus, less soft tissue damage, e. g., lower rates of radial nerve palsy, possibly closed reduction and the biomechanical aspects of a central implant with elastic fixation properties. Nailing of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures is an equivalent alternative to plate osteosynthesis, nailing of proximal metaphyseal humeral fractures is still new and needs more reliable scientific data to clarify its advantages compared to other fixation techniques. Nailing of distal metaphyseal humeral fractures is not a serious option at the moment. For proximal fractures or fracture components, angular stable interlocking systems show better fixation qualities, although in very osteoporotic bone cut-outs are known. The torsional load occurring during the usual movement of the upper limbs requires high torsional stability of the fracture fixation. Here static interlocking shows the best performance, as it is part of the modern concepts. Possible complications of humeral nailing have to be realized. There is an important learning curve for surgeons, starting from plating and changing to humeral nailing.

References

Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Jochen Blum

Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie · Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

Langenbeckstr. 1

55131 Mainz

Germany

Phone: Phone: +49/61 31-17 28 45

Fax: +49/61 31-17 40 43

Email: blum@unfall.klinik.uni-mainz.de