Stories of Origin in the Identification of Hearing Loss among Neonates

Parental reactions to the initial indication of possible hearing loss among newborn infants were gathered through two focus-group interviews. All of the infants had been screened in a state-wide universal hearing screening program. Stories of origin told by parents in which they recounted their initial discovery of a problem were examined qualitatively for thematic content. Analysis of these stories revealed six troublesome features of informing practices surrounding the identification of hearing loss, which we classify as nonhearings, mishearings, misunderstandings, responses to parental questions, inaccurate information, and inadequate explanations. In light of these findings, conduit and constructivist models of communication are considered with respect to their viability for understanding and possibly improving professional practices of informing in this setting.

Neonatal hearing screening - family-centered services - qualitative analysis

REFERENCES

• 1 Mastergeorge A M. Revelations of family perceptions of diagnosis and disorder through metaphor. In: Kovarsky D, Duchan J, Maxwell M Constructing (In)Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum 1999: 245-256
• 2 Corcoran J A, Stewart M, Glynn M, Woodman D. Stories of parents of children with hearing loss: a qualitative analysis of interview narratives. In: Seewald RC A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification: Proceedings of an International Conference. Chicago, IL; Phonak 2000: 167-173
• 3 Roush J. Staying family-centered. In: Kurtzer-White E, Luterman D Early Childhood Deafness. Baltimore, MD; York Press 2001: 49-62
• 4 Roush J. Implementing parent-infant services: advice from families. In: Seewald RC A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification: Proceedings of an International Conference. Chicago, IL; Phonak 2000: 159-165
• 5 Yoshinaga-Itano C, de Uzcategui C A. Early identification and social-emotional factors of children with hearing loss and children screened for hearing loss. In: Kurtzer-White E, Luterman D Early Childhood Deafness. Baltimore, MD; York Press 2001: 12-28
• 6 Maxwell M, Power D, Hyde M. Language policies and deaf identity. Sydney, Australia; International Communication Association (panel) July 1994
• 7 Meyers G. Displaying opinions: topics and disagreements in focus groups.  Lang in Soc. 1998;  27 85-112
• 8 Morgan D L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Methods Series. Vol. 16. Newbury Park, CA; Sage 1998: 5-83
• 9 Cicourel A V. Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. New York; Free Press 1974
• 10 Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 2nd ed. London; Routledge 1995
• 11 Patton M Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA; Sage Press 1999
• 12 Bruner J. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press 1986
• 13 Tannen D. Talking Voices. New York; Cambridge University Press 1989
• 14 Hill J H, Irvine J T. Introduction. In: Hill JH, Irvine JT Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press 1993: 1-23
• 15 Grimshaw A. Mishearings, misunderstandings, and other nonsuccesses at talk: a plea for redress of speaker-oriented bias.  Sociol Inq. 1980;  40 31-74
• 16 Rance G, Beer D E, Cone-Wesson B et al.. Clinical findings for a group of infants and young children with auditory neuropathy.  Ear Hear. 1999;  20 238-252
• 17 Labov W, Fanshel D. Therapeutic Discourse. New York; Academic Press 1977
• 18 Bruder M B. Family-centered intervention: clarifying our values for the new millennium.  Topics Early Child Spec Ed. 2000;  20 105-115
• 19 Kovarsky D, Singer J, Beatty L, Iacono T, Franklin A. Evaluative reactions to service delivery: “oracular reasoning.”  New Perspectives Com Sci Disord. 2000;  27 153-163
• 20 Simmons-Mackie N, Damico J S. Social negotiation in aphasia therapy: competence, incompetence and conflict. In: Kovarsky D, Duchan J, Maxwell M Constructing (In)Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum 1999: 313-341
• 21 Stillman R, Snow R, Warren K. “I used to be good with kids.” Encounters between speech-language pathology students and children with pervasive developmental disorders (PDD). In: Kovarsky D, Duchan J, Maxwell M Constructing (In)Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum 1999: 29-48
• 22 Reddy M J. The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In: Ortony A Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press 1979: 284-324
• 23 Duchan J, Maxwell M, Kovarsky D. Introduction. In: Kovarsky D, Duchan J, Maxwell M Constructing (In)Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum 1999: 3-26
• 24 Coupland N, Giles H, Wiemann J M. “Miscommunication” and Problematic Talk. Newbury Park, CA; Sage 1991
• 25 Gumperz J J, Tannen D. Individual and social differences in language use. In: Fillmore C, Kempler D, Wang WS-Y Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior. New York; Academic Press 1979: 305-325
• 26 Hanks W F. Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder, CO; Westview Press 1996