Download PDF
Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care 2005; 13(1): 26-33
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-836372
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

The Titanium Gamma Nail as Routine Treatment of Pertrochanteric Femoral Fractures

J. Klanke1 , J. Franke1 , K. Westermann1
  • 1Klinikum Hannover, Nordstadt Hospital, Clinic for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 March 2005 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

A retrospective study was aimed at determining whether complications like cut-out and femoral shaft fracture, which are associated with the first-generation Gamma nail, could be diminished by using the improved, third-generation Gamma nail, the so-called titanium Gamma nail. The study described here consisted of 71 patients with pertrochanteric femur fracture that were treated operatively with the titanium Gamma nail in our clinic in 2001. The evaluation was carried out on the basis of patients' records, X-ray analyses and, in some cases, telephone interviews. Specific complications included one femoral-shaft fracture far below the nail and one mal-positioned femoral neck screw. No typical cut-out of the femoral neck screw occurred in any of the patients. The rates of complications not associated with the implant, e. g., wound infection, were comparable to those reported in the literature. Due to improvements of the implant, particularly of the femoral lag screw, and to improvements of the surgical instruments, the titanium Gamma nail is considered to be a safe implant for all fractures of the trochanteric region of the femur.

Key words

cut-out - lag screw - femoral shaft fracture - complications - implant failure - fixed-nail plate - sliding-screw plate

References

  • 1 Al-Yassari G, Langstaff R J, Jones J WM, Al-Lami M. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture.  Injury. 2002;  33 395-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Banan H, Al-Sabti A, Jimulia T, Hart A J. The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) - our first 60 cases.  Injury. 2002;  33 401-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bannister G C, Orth M C, Gibson A G, Ackroyd C E, Newman J H. The fixation and prognosis of trochanteric fractures.  Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1990;  254 242-246
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Benum P, Grontvedt T, Braten M, Walloe A, Ekeland A, Raugstad S, Fasting O. Gamma nail versus CHS in intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: a preliminary report of a prospective randomized study.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;  63 (Suppl 247) 7-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bonnaire F, Götschin U, Kuner E H. Früh- und Spätergebnisse nach 200 DHS-Osteosynthesen zur Versorgung pertrochanterer Femurfrakturen.  Unfallchirurg. 1992;  95 246-253
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bonnaire F, Hellmund R, Lein T. DHS - Stärken und Schwächen der Platten-Schrauben-Kombinationen.  Trauma Berufskrankh. 2003;  5 (Suppl 2) 162-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Brandt S E, Lefever S, Janzing H MJ, Broos P LO, Pilot P, Houben B JJ. Percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) versus the dynamic hip screw for pertrochanteric hip fractures: preliminary results.  Injury. 2002;  33 413-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bridle S H, Patel A D, Bircher M, Calvert P T. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1991;  73 330-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chinoy M A, Parker M J. Fixed nail plates versus sliding hip systems for the treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures: a meta analysis of 14 studies.  Injury. 1999;  30 157-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Davis T RC, Sher J L, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter B B, Checketts R G. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1990;  72 26-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fornander P, Thorngren K G, Törnqvist H, Ahrengart L, Lindgren U. A Swedish experience of the first 209 randomized patients with Gamma nail vs. screw plate.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;  63 (Suppl 248) 90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Friedl W, Colombo-Benkmann M, Dockter S, Machens H G, Mieck U. Gammanagel-Osteosynthese per- und subtrochanterer Femurfrakturen.  Chirurg. 1994;  65 953-963
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Goldhagen P R, O'Connor D R, Schwarze D, Schwartz E. A prospective comparative study of the compression hip screw and the Gamma nail.  J Orthop Trauma. 1994;  8 367-372
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gonschorek O, Verheyden A P, Tiemann A, Josten C. Komplikationen mit dem proximalen Femurnagel.  Trauma Berufskrankh. 2003;  5 (Suppl 2) 171-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Guyer P, Landoldt M, Eberle C, Keller H. Der Gamma-Nagel als belastungsstabile Alternative zur DHS bei der instabilen proximalen Femurfraktur des alten Menschen.  Helv Chir Acta. 1992;  58 697-703
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Haidukewych G J, Israel T A, Berry D J. Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2001;  83 643-650
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Heinz T, Vécsei V. Komplikationen und Fehler bei der Anwendung des Gammanagels.  Chirurg. 1994;  65 943-952
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hoffmann R, Linskey T G. Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur; a randomized prospective comparison of the Gamma nail and the Ambi hip screw.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1993;  75 (Suppl 1) 50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hoffmann R, Schmidmaier G, Schulz R, Schütz M, Südkamp N P. Classic-Nagel vs. Dynamische Hüftschraube (DHS).  Unfallchirurg. 1999;  102 182-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hogh J, Andersen K, Duus B, Hansen D, Hellberg S, Jakobsen B, Jensen J, Jensen P E, Mikkelsen S, Schroder H, Soelberg M. Gamma nail versus DHS in the treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;  63 (Suppl 248) 87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Karich B. Probleme mit dem γ-Nagel - Optimierungsmöglichkeiten.  Trauma Berufskrankh. 2003;  5 (Suppl 2) 175-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kaufer H. Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries.  Clin Orthop. 1980;  146 53-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Klanke J, Stepanek E, Westermann K. Injury of a branch of the arteria profunda femoris after a pertrochanteric femur fracture.  Osteo Trauma Care. 2002;  10 76-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Manner M, Ruf W. Die dynamische Hüftschraube.  Unfallchirurg. 1988;  91 299-306
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 McLaren C AN, Buckley J R, Rowley D I. Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: a randomized prospective trial comparing the Pugh nail with the dynamic hip screw.  Injury. 1991;  22 193-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mills H J, Horne G. Displacement of subcapital fractures during internal fixation: a real problem?.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1989;  59 249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Müller M E. Klassifikation und internationale AO-Dokumentation der Femurfrakturen.  Unfallheilkunde. 1980;  83 251-259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Parker M J, Pryor G A. Gamma versus DHS-nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures.  Int Orthop. 1996;  20 163-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Parker M J, Handoll H HG. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures (Cochrane revue). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2001. Update Software, Oxford, www.update-software.com/CLIP/CL…F = &H = &D = 1&L = 376N = 400&M = 1081&C = 398&T = *
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Radford P J, Needoff M, Webb J K. A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1993;  75 789-793
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ragnarsson J I, Hansson L I, Karrholm J. Stability of femoral neck fractures. A postoperative roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;  60 283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sabharval S, O'Brien P J, Meek R N, Blachut P, Broekhuyse H M. Intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation - Gamma versus dynamic hip screw. A randomized prospective study.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1992;  74 (Suppl 3) 281
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sim E, Berzlanovich A. The influence of biomechanically inadequate internal fixation on dynamic hip screws.  Osteo Trauma Care. 2002;  10 13-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Simmermacher R KJ, Bosch A M, Werken C Van der. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures.  Injury. 1999;  30 327-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Swiontkowski M F, Harrington R M, Keller T S, Patten P K Van. Torsion and bending analysis of internal fixation techniques for femoral neck fractures: the role of implant design and bone density.  J Orthop Res. 1987;  5 433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Valverde J A, Alonso M G, Porro J G, Ruede D, Larrauri P M, Soler J J. Use of the Gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur.  Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1998;  350 56-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. med. Jörg Klanke

Klinikum Hannover · Nordstadt Hospital · Clinic for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery

Haltenhoffstraße 41

30167 Hannover

Germany

Phone: + 49/5 11/9 70 12 34

Fax: + 49/5 11/9 70 16 41

Email: joerg.klanke.nordstadt@klinikum-hannover.de

      >