Free-Flap Monitoring Using a Chimeric Sentinel Muscle Perforator Flap

ABSTRACT

Muscle perforator flaps have become an important resource for the creation of cutaneous flaps based on musculocutaneous perforators, but without inclusion of the involved muscle. As a chimeric flap with or without the muscle, the cutaneous perforator flap can specifically serve as a sentinel or monitoring flap to allow the early detection of anastomotic compromise involving the common source vessel, without the need for direct observation of the major free-flap component. This can be a valuable adjunctive use of muscle perforator flaps for the continuous assessment of free muscle flaps or as an exteriorized flap for the monitoring of buried free flaps.

KEYWORDS

Muscle perforator flaps - flap monitoring - sentinel flaps

REFERENCES

• 1 Disa J J, Cordeiro P G, Hidalgo D A. Efficacy of conventional monitoring techniques in free tissue transfer: an 11-year experience in 750 consecutive cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104 97-101
• 2 Hirigoyen M B, Urken M L, Weinberg H. Free flap monitoring: a review of current practice.  Microsurgery. 1995;  16 723-726
• 3 Khouri R K, Cooley B C, Kunselman A R et al.. International Microvascular Research Group. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  102 711-721
• 4 Whitaker I S, Oliver D W, Ganchi P A. Postoperative monitoring of microvascular tissue transfers: current practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  111 2118-2119
• 5 Yoshimura M, Imura S, Shimamura K, Yamauchi S, Nomura S. Peroneal flap for reconstruction in the extremity: preliminary report.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;  74 402-409
• 6 Hallock G G, Koch T J. External monitoring of vascularized jejunum transfers using laser doppler flowmetry.  Ann Plast Surg. 1990;  24 213-215
• 7 Choo B C, Shin D P, Byun J S, Park J W, Baik B S. Monitoring flap for buried free tissue transfer: its importance and reliability.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110 1249-1258
• 8 Furuta S, Hataya Y, Ishigaki Y, Watanabe T. Monitoring the free radial forearm flap in pharyngo-oesophageal reconstruction.  Br J Plast Surg. 1997;  50 40-42
• 9 Iwasawa M, Furuta S, Hayasi M, Ohtsuka Y, Kushima H. Use of a monitor muscle flap in buried free forearm flap transfer.  Ann Plast Surg. 1996;  37 364-366
• 10 Wei F C, Jain V, Suomineu S, Chen H C. Confusion among perforator flaps: what is a true perforator flap?.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107 874-876
• 11 Hallock G G. Doppler sonography and color duplex imaging for planning a perforator flap.  Clin Plast Surg. 2003;  30 347-357
• 12 Yokoo S, Komori T, Furudoi S, Umeda M, Nomura T, Tahara S. Rare variant of the intrasoleus musculocutaneous perforator: clinical considerations in raising a free peroneal osteocutaneous flap.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2001;  17 225-228
• 13 Hallock G G. The gracilis (medial circumflex femoral) perforator flap: a medial groin free flap?.  Ann Plast Surg. 2003;  51 623-626
• 14 Hallock G G. Simplified nomenclature for compound flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  105 1465-1470
• 15 Jenkins S, Sepka R, Barwick W J. Routine use of laser Doppler flowmetry for monitoring autologous tissue transplants.  Ann Plast Surg. 1988;  21 423-426