Endoscopy 2006; 38(3): 214-217
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-921172
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Improvement in Colonoscopy Performance with Adjunctive Magnetic Endoscope Imaging: A Randomized Controlled Trial

H.  Y.  S.  Cheung1 , C.  C.  Chung1 , S.  Y.  Kwok1 , W.  W.  C.  Tsang1 , M.  K.  W.  Li1
  • 1Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong, SAR, China
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 23 February 2005

Accepted after revision 6 June 2005

Publication Date:
10 March 2006 (online)

Background and Study Aim: Although magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI) has been reported to improve the performance of colonoscopy, so far only a few randomized controlled studies have been published supporting its adjunctive role. This randomized study was designed to evaluate the role of MEI on the overall performance of colonoscopy.
Patients and Methods: Patients admitted for elective colonoscopy were recruited. They were randomly allocated into two groups, either with an MEI view (study group) or without (control group). Examinations were performed by one of the two designated, trained endoscopists. The primary end point was intubation time. Other outcome measures included completion rate, pain score graded by patients, and ease of procedure as reflected by the number of attempts at straightening the scope, the number of times of hand pressure was applied abdominally, and the need to change the patient’s position. Endoscopists were also asked to score the ease of procedure. Finally, in the MEI group, endoscopists were asked to comment on whether MEI helped to locate colonic lesions during endoscopy.

Results: In a 12-month period, 120 patients were recruited, with 60 patients in each group. The two groups were matched for age, gender distribution, and indications for colonoscopy. No complication occurred in either group. No significant difference was observed in the intubation time and colonoscopy completion rate. Other measures of ease of procedure and pain score were also similar. However, MEI was reported by endoscopists to be helpful in locating colonic lesions in 32 % of examinations with positive findings.
Conclusion: For trained endoscopists, the device confers no benefit in terms of performance improvement. The only identified benefit is in locating lesions. Thus, while the routine use of MEI cannot be recommended, the device could be selectively offered to patients for follow-up examination after local treatment, or to patients with small colorectal tumors in whom laparoscopic surgery is planned.

References

  • 1 Abulafi A M, Marks C G. The role of colonoscopy in coloproctological practice.  Hosp Med. 1998;  59 612-616
  • 2 Cappell M S, Friedel D. The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: endoscopic findings, therapy, and complications.  Med Clin N Am. 2002;  86 1253-1288
  • 3 Ball J E, Osbourne J, Jowett S. et al . Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study.  BMJ. 2004;  329 665-667
  • 4 Mitchell R M, McCallion K, Gardiner K R. et al . Successful colonoscopy; completion rates and reasons for incompletion.  Ulster Med J. 2002;  71 34-37
  • 5 Korman L Y, Overholt B F, Box T, Winker C K. Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 554-557
  • 6 Ker T S, Wasserberg N, Beart R W Jr. Colonoscopic perforation and bleeding of the colon can be treated safely without surgery.  Am Surg. 2004;  70 922-924
  • 7 Misra S P. Colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 957-960
  • 8 Geenen R W, Hussain S M, Cademartiri F. et al . CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection.  Radiographics. 2004;  24 e18. Epub 2003
  • 9 Shah S G, Brooker J C, Williams C B, Thapar C, Saunders B P. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2000;  356 1718-1722
  • 10 Bladen J S, Anderson A P, Bell G D. et al . Non-radiological technique for three-dimensional imaging of endoscopes.  Lancet. 1993;  34 719-722
  • 11 Saunders B P, Bell G D, Williams C B. et al . First clinical results with a real time, electronic imager as an aid to colonoscopy.  Gut. 1995;  36 913-917
  • 12 Shah S G, Thomas-Gibson S, Lockett M. et al . Effect of real-time magnetic endoscope imaging on the teaching and acquisition of colonoscopy skills: results from a single trainee.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 421-425
  • 13 Shah S G, Brooker J C, Thapar C. et al . Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on patient tolerance and sedation requirements during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 832-827
  • 14 Wehrmann K, Fruhmorgen P. Evaluation of a new three-dimensional magnetic imaging system for use during colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  3 905-908
  • 15 Suzuki T, Matsushima M, Ihara K. et al . Clinical significance of the use of magnetic endoscope imaging for colonoscopy.  Dig Endosc. 2004;  16 322-326
  • 16 Shah S G, Brooker J C, Thapar C. et al . Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 435-440
  • 17 Chung C C, Tsang W WC, Kwok S Y, Li M KW. Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease.  Colorect Dis. 2003;  5 528-543

H. Y. S. Cheung, M. D.

Department of Surgery

Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital · Chai Wan · Hong Kong

Fax: +852-251-53195

Email: yui92549@yahoo.com

    >