Endoscopy 2006; 38(6): 553-560
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925164
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Accuracy of General Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Performed by Nurse or Medical Endoscopists

C.  Meaden1 , M.  Joshi2 , S.  Hollis2 , A.  Higham1 , D.  Lynch3
  • 1 Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK
  • 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
  • 3 Blackburn Royal Infirmary, Blackburn, UK
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 7 February 2005

Accepted after revision 18 August 2005

Publication Date:
27 June 2006 (online)

Background and Study Aims: Rising demand for general diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the UK is outgrowing the capacity of doctors to provide this service within a reasonable time. One solution is to train nurses to carry out the procedure, but it is not known whether nurses can perform general diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as competently as doctors.
Patients and Methods: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial compared the adequacy and the accuracy of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed by five medical and two nurse endoscopists. The videotaped procedures were assessed by a consultant gastroenterologist blinded to the identity of the endoscopist.
Results: 641 patients were randomly allocated (before attendance and consent procedure) to endoscopy carried out either by a doctor or a nurse. Of these, 412 were enrolled and 367 (89 %) were included in the analysis. An adequate view was obtained throughout in 53.4 % (93/177) of doctor endoscopies and 91.6 % (174/190) of nurse endoscopies (difference 38.2 %, 95 % CL 30.5 %, 47.2 %). In adequately viewed areas, the mean agreement between doctor and expert was 81.0 % and between nurse and expert it was 78.3 % (difference between the means 2.7 %, 95 % CL - 1.0 %, 6.4 %). There was no difference between doctors and nurses in the rate of biopsy performance (90.4 % and 91.1 %, respectively, P = 0.862). Nurses took longer (8.1 minutes vs. 4.6 minutes, P < 0.001) and used intravenous sedation more often (57.6 %, P = 0.027). Adequacy of view correlated positively with endoscopy duration (P < 0.001), but diagnostic accuracy correlated inversely with duration (P < 0.001). Neither adequacy or accuracy correlated significantly with use of intravenous sedation.
Conclusions: In endoscopies performed by nurses, the proportion of adequate examinations was much higher than that found for doctors. In areas with an adequate view, there is no significant difference in accuracy between nurses and doctors. Nurses can provide an accurate general diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy service as competently as doctors.

References

  • 1 What is the NHS cancer plan? (Editorial).  Nurs Times. 2000;  96 13
  • 2 British Society of Gastroenterology . The nurse endoscopist.  Gut. 1995;  36 795
  • 3 Maule W F. Screening for colorectal cancer by nurse endoscopists.  N Engl J Med. 1994;  330 183-187
  • 4 Schoenfeld P, Lipscomb S, Crook J. et al . Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomized trial.  Gastroenterology. 1999;  117 312-318
  • 5 Wildi S M, Wallace M B, Glenn T F. et al . Accuracy of esophagoscopy performed by a non-physician endoscopist with a 4-mm diameter battery-powered endoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 305-310
  • 6 Smale S, Bjarnason I, Forgacs I. et al . Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed by nurses: scope for the future?.  Gut. 2003;  52 1090-1094
  • 7 Pathmakanthan S, Murray I, Smith K. et al . Nurse endoscopists in United Kingdom health care: a survey of prevalence, skills and attitudes.  J Adv Nurs. 2001;  36 705-710
  • 8 Wright K B. A description of the gastroenterology nurse endoscopist role in the United States.  Gastroenterol Nurs. 2000;  23 78-82
  • 9 Bowles C J, Leicester R, Romaya C. et al . A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?.  Gut. 2004;  53 277-283
  • 10 Stolte M, Sticht T, Eidt S. et al . Frequency, location, and age and sex distribution of various types of gastric polyp.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 659-665
  • 11 Foutch P G. Angiodysplasia of the gastrointestinal tract.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;  88 807-818
  • 12 Foutch P G, Rex D K, Lieberman D A. Prevalence and natural history of colonic angiodysplasia among healthy asymptomatic people.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 564-567
  • 13 Neumann M, Friedl S, Meining A. et al . A score card for upper GI endoscopy: evaluation of interobserver variability in examiners with various levels of experience.  Z Gastroenterol. 2002;  40 857-862
  • 14 Shah S G, Thomas-Gibson S, Brooker J C. et al . Use of video and magnetic endoscope imaging for rating competence at colonoscopy: validation of a measurement tool.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 568-573
  • 15 Mokhashi M S, Hawes R H. Struggling toward easier endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 432-440

C. Meaden, M. D.

Royal Lancaster Infirmary

Ashton Road · Lancaster LA14RP · UK·

Fax: +44-1524-583166·

Email: chrismeaden@aol.com

    >