Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2006; 19(1): 026-032
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-939528
Copyright © 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Laparoscopy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pushing the Envelope

Peter W. Marcello1
  • 1Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 April 2006 (online)

ABSTRACT

Despite the slower learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy and the lack of prospective randomized trials, laparoscopic procedures have repeatedly demonstrated a shortened length of stay, reduction in postoperative ileus, and earlier resumption of diet. However, laparoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease has unique challenges that must be overcome. For the patient with uncomplicated terminal ileal Crohn's disease, there are definite reproducible advantages to a minimally invasive approach. As surgeons gain experience, more complex cases may be attempted laparoscopically with a low threshold to alternate the approach if difficulties are encountered. We will continue to “push the envelope” in patients with complex Crohn's disease to allow more to be done in complex cases. For the patient with Crohn's colitis and ulcerative colitis, the role of a minimally invasive approach is less well defined. In experienced hands, a laparoscopic total colectomy can be performed safely and offers the patient all the advantages seen with laparoscopic segmental resection. Outcomes are likely to improve with better training, techniques, and equipment. As the field of minimally invasive surgery continues to expand, what is being “pushed” today will be routine in the future.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Bauer J J, Harris M T, Grumbach N M et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection for Crohn's disease. Which patients are good candidates?.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996;  23 44-46
  • 2 Wu J S, Birnbaum E H, Kodner I J et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resections in patients with Crohn's disease: are abscesses, phlegmons, or recurrent disease contraindications?.  Surgery. 1997;  122 682-688
  • 3 Dunker M S, Stiggelbout A M, van Hogezand R A et al.. Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 1334-1340
  • 4 Wong S K, Marcello P W, Hammerhoffer K A et al.. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: an analysis of 92 cases.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 S4 , (Abstract)
  • 5 Canin-Endres J, Salky B, Gattorno F et al.. Laparoscopic assisted intestinal resection in 88 patients with Crohn's disease.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 595-599
  • 6 Alabaz O, Irotulam A J, Nessim A et al.. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and conventional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.  Eur J Surg. 2000;  166 213-217
  • 7 Bemelman W A, Slors J FM, Dunker M S et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted vs open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a comparative study.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 721-725
  • 8 Young-Fadok T M, Hall Long K, McConnell E J et al.. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn's disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 450-454
  • 9 Schmidt C M, Talamini M A, Kaufman H S et al.. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: a single institution experience.  Ann Surg. 2001;  233 733-739
  • 10 Milsom J W, Hammerhofer K A, Bohm B et al.. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1-9
  • 11 Duepree H J, Senagore A J, Delaney C P et al.. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 605-610
  • 12 Shore G, Gonzalez Q H, Bondora A et al.. Laparoscopic vs. conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn's disease.  Arch Surg. 2003;  138 76-79
  • 13 Benoist S, Panis Y, Beaufour A et al.. Laparoscopic ileocecal resection in Crohn's disease: a case-matched comparison with open resection.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 814-818
  • 14 Bergamaschi R, Pessaux P, Arneaud J P. Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1129-1133
  • 15 Tabet J, Hong D, Kim C W et al.. Recurrence after laparoscopic bowel resection for Crohn's disease: comparison to open technique.  Can J Gastroenterol. 2001;  15 237-242
  • 16 Rosman A S, Melis M, Fichera A. Metaanalysis of trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for Crohn's disease.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 1549-1555
  • 17 Schmitt S L, Cohen S M, Wexner S D et al.. Does laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalization?.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994;  9 134-137
  • 18 Reissman P, Salky B A, Pfeifer J et al.. Laparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.  Am J Surg. 1996;  171 47-50
  • 19 Milsom J W, Ludwig K A, Church J M et al.. Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 675-678
  • 20 Meijerink W JH, Eijsbouts Q AJ, Cuesta M A et al.. Laparoscopically assisted bowel surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 882-886
  • 21 Marcello P W, Milsom J W, Wong S K et al.. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 604-608
  • 22 Seshadri P A, Poulin E C, Schlachta C M et al.. Laparoscopic total colectomy and proctocolectomy: short and long term results.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 837-842
  • 23 Hamel C, Hilderbrandt U, Weiss E et al.. Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: ileocolic resection versus subtotal colectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 642-645
  • 24 Marcello P W, Milsom J W, Wong S K et al.. Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case control study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1441-1445
  • 25 Brown S R, Eu K W, Seow-Choen F. Consecutive series of laparoscopic-assisted vs. minilaparotomy restorative proctocolectomies.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 397-400
  • 26 Dunker M S, Bemelman W A, Slors J F et al.. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1800-1807
  • 27 Ky A J, Sonoda T, Milsom J W. One-stage laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: an alternative to the conventional approach?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 207-211
  • 28 Bell R L, Seymour N E. Laparoscopic treatment of fulminant ulcerative colitis.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 1778-1782
  • 29 Rivadeneira D E, Marcello P W, Roberts P L et al.. Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47 1613-1619
  • 30 Kienle P, Weitz J, Benner A et al.. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 716-720
  • 31 Nakajima K, Lee S W, Cocilovo C et al.. Hand assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery using Gelport: initial experience with a new hand access device.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18 102-105
  • 32 Larson D W, Dozios E J, Piotrowicz K et al.. Laparoscopic assisted vs. open pouch anal anastomosis: functional outcomes in a case matched series.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 1845-1850

Peter W MarcelloM.D. 

Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery

Lahey Clinic, 41 Mall Rd., Burlington, MA 01805

Email: peter.w.marcello@lahey.org

    >