Download PDF
Endoscopy 2006; 38(12): 1241-1245
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-945003
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in post-Whipple patients

P.  Chahal1 , T.  H.  Baron1 , M.  D.  Topazian1 , B.  T.  Petersen1 , M.  J.  Levy1 , C.  J.  Gostout1
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Maryland, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 3 March 2006

Accepted after revision 8 August 2006

Publication Date:
11 December 2006 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an established modality for evaluation and treatment of pancreaticobiliary disorders. However, it is technically more challenging in patients with post-surgical anatomy. The success rate of ERCP in patients with prior pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple resection) is unknown. We assessed the technical success and safety of ERCP in this patient population.
Patients and methods: Post pancreaticoduodenectomy patients who had undergone ERCP between January 2002 and May 2005 were identified through a computerized medical index system. ERCP was considered successful if the duct of clinical interest had been cannulated and endoscopic therapy had been performed when indicated.
Results: ERCP was attempted 88 times in 51 patients with prior pancreaticoduodenectomy, including 37 procedures for pancreatic indications, 44 for biliary obstruction, and 7 for both biliary and pancreatic indications. The overall technical success rate of ERCP based on the intention behind the procedure was 51 % (45 of the 88 procedures). Success was significantly more likely for biliary indications (37/44, 84 %) than for pancreatic indications (3/37, 8 %) (P ≤ .001). Complications occurred in 2 % of the procedures and included one self- contained perforation treated medically and one Mallory-Weiss tear.
Conclusions: When performed by experienced endoscopists, ERCP in patients with prior pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe, with a high success rate for biliary indications and a low success rate for pancreatic duct indications. Better methods of achieving pancreatic duct cannulation after pancreaticoduodenectomy are needed.

References

  • 1 Hintze R E, Adler A, Veltzke W. et al . The clinical importance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP).  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 182-187
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Suissa A, Yassin K, Lavy A. Outcome and early complications of ERCP: a prospective single center study.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;  52 352-355
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Safrany L, Neuhaus B, Portocarrero G, Krause S. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy.  Endoscopy. 1980;  12 16-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Katon R M, Bilbao M K, Parent J A, Smith F W. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy (Billroth II): a case for the forward look.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1975;  21 164-165
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Siegel J H, Yatoo R P. ERCP and endoscopic papillotomy in patients with a Billroth II gastrectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1983;  28 116-118
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Al-Kawas F H, Gellar A. A new approach to sphincterotomy in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 253-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Osnes M, Rosseland A R, Aabakken L. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic papillotomy in patients with a previous Billroth II resection.  Gut. 1986;  27 1193-1198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kim M H, Lee S K, Lee M H. et al . Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and needle knife sphincterotomy in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy: a comparative study of the forward-viewing endoscope and the side-viewing endoscope.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 82-85
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mosca S. How can we reduce complication rates and enhance success rates in Billroth II patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 589-590
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Costamagna G. ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in Billroth II patients: a demanding technique for experts only?.  Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;  30 306-309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Aabakken L, Holthe B, Sandstad O. et al . Endoscopic pancreaticobiliary procedures in patients with a Billroth II resection: a 10-year follow-up study.  Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;  30 301-305
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Prat F, Fritsch J, Choury A D. et al . Endoscopic sphincteroplasty: a useful therapeutic tool for biliary endoscopy in Billroth II gastrectomy patients.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 79-81
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bedogni G, Bertoni G, Contini S. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with Billroth II partial gastrectomy: comparison of three different techniques.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1984;  30 300-304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 van Buuren H R, Boender J, Nix G A, van Blankenstein M. Needle-knife sphincterotomy guided by a biliary endoprosthesis in Billroth II gastrectomy patients.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 229-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bergman J J, van Berkel A M, Bruno M J. et al . A randomized trial of endoscopic balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones in patients with a prior Billroth II gastrectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 19-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lin L F, Siauw C P, Ho K S, Tung J C. ERCP in post-Billroth II gastrectomy patients: emphasis on technique.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 144-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Faylona J MV, Qadir A, Chan A CW. et al . Small-bowel perforations related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 546-549
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hintze R E, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H. Endoscopic access to the papilla of Vater for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 69-73
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Feitoza A B, Baron T H. Endoscopy and ERCP in the setting of previous upper GI tract surgery: Part II: postsurgical anatomy with alteration of the pancreaticobiliary tree.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  55 75-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Feitoza A B, Baron T H. Endoscopy and ERCP in the setting of previous upper GI tract surgery: Part I: reconstruction without alteration of pancreaticobiliary anatomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 743-749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wright B E, Cass O W, Freeman M L. ERCP in patients with long-limb Roux-en-Y gastro-jejunostomy and intact papilla.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 225-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hintze R E, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H. Endoscopic sphincterotomy using an S-shaped sphincterotome in patients with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 74-78
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Elton E, Hanson B L, Qaseem T, Howell D A. Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP using an enteroscope and a pediatric colonoscope in long-limb surgical bypass patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 62-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gostout C J, Bender C E. Cholangiopancreatography, sphincterotomy, and common duct stone removal via Roux-en-Y limb enteroscopy.  Gastroenterology. 1988;  95 156-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rios G, Conrad A, Cole D, Adams D. et al . Trends in indications and outcomes in the Whipple procedure over a 40-year period.  Am Surg. 1999;  65 889-893
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Yeo C J, Cameron J L, Sohn T A. et al . Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990 s: pathology, complications, and outcomes.  Ann Surg. 1997;  226 248-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jimenez R E, Fernandez del Castillo C, Rattner D W. et al . Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis.  Ann Surg. 2000;  231 293-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Trede M. Technique of Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy. In: Trede M, Carter DC, eds Surgery of the pancreas. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1997: 487-498
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Farnell M B, Nagorney D M, Sarr M G. The Mayo Clinic approach to the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.  Surg Clin N Am. 2001;  81 611-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pitt H A. Curative treatment for pancreatic neoplasms. Standard resection.  Surg Clin N Am. 1995;  75 891-904
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Geoghegan J, Pappas T N. Clinical uses of gut peptides.  Ann Surg. 1997;  225 145-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rumalla A, Baron T H, Leontovich O. et al . Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;  76 29-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Baron T H, Harewood G C, Rumalla A. et al . A prospective comparison of digital image analysis and routine cytology for the identification of malignancy in biliary tract strictures.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 214-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Khan S A, Davidson B R, Goldin R. et al . Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: consensus document.  Gut. 2002;  51 Suppl 6 Vl1-Vl9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Gores G J. Cholangiocarcinoma: current concepts and insights.  Hepatology. 2003;  37 961-969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tarnasky P R, Cotton P B, Baille J, Branch M S, Affronti J, Jowell P. et al . Proximal migration of biliary stents: attempted endoscopic retrieval in forty-one patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 513-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

T. H. Baron, M. D.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine

200 First St SW · Rochester · MN, 55901 · USA

Fax: +01-507-266-3939

Email: baron.todd@mayo.edu

      >