Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2007; 11(3): 101-109
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963310
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Umsetzung der ICF und der ICF-Core-Sets für lumbale Rückenschmerzen in der Rehabilitation

Teil 1Applying the ICF and ICF Core Sets for Low Back Pain in Rehabilitation MedicinePart 1M. Kirschneck1 , A. Gläßel1 , S. Wilke2 , G. Stucki1, 2
  • 1Institut für Gesundheits- und Rehabilitationswissenschaften, ICF Research Branch of the WHO CC FIC (DIMDI), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
  • 2Klinik und Poliklinik für Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 11.7.2006

Manuskript akzeptiert: 30.8.2006

Publication Date:
17 July 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die ICF ist eine umfassende Klassifikation zur Einschätzung der funktionalen Gesundheit unter Berücksichtigung der Bereiche Funktion, Struktur, Aktivitäten und Partizipation sowie Umweltfaktoren eines Patienten. Die Gesundheitsstörung LBP gehört zu den Erkrankungen mit den höchsten, durch Arbeitsunfähigkeit verursachten Kosten. Ein umfassendes Patientenmanagement der funktionalen Probleme zielt darauf ab, diese Situation zu verbessern.

Der 1. Teil des Artikels zeigt, wie die Einführung der ICF-Core-Sets für LBP ein optimiertes Verständnis für die Krankheitskonsequenzen und einhergehende Behinderung von Menschen mit LBP fördern kann. Darüber hinaus werden Zusammenhänge zwischen der ICF und Instrumenten zur Messung des Gesundheitszustands dargestellt, die den Prozess der Assessments in der Therapie und Rehabilitation unterstützen können.

Abstract

The ICF is a comprehensive classification which considers the areas of function, structure, activity and participation as well as the patient's environment in order to assess functional physical health. The impairment LBP belongs to the diseases which lead to the highest costs due to high rates of unfitness for work. Comprehensive patient management of functional problems aims at the improvement of this situation.

The first part of this article shows how the implementation of ICF Core Sets for LBP can support the optimised understanding of disease consequences and disability of patients with LBP. In addition, the correlation between the ICF and instruments used for the evaluation of physical health state are portrayed. This may support the process of assessment in therapy and rehabilitation.

Schlüsselwörter

ICF - ICF-Core-Set - Funktionsfähigkeit - Gesundheitszustand - LBP

Key words

ICF - ICF Core Set - capability - physical health state - LBP

Literatur

  • 1 Andersson G BJ. The epidemiology of spinal disorders. Frymoyer JW The adult spine: principles and practice Philadelphia; Lippincott-Raven 1997 2nd ed
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Andersson G B. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain.  Lancet. 1999;  354 581-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Atalay A, Arslan S, Dincer F. Psychosocial function, clinical status, and radiographic findings in a group of chronic low back pain patients.  Rheumatol Int. 2001;  21 62-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bekkering G E, Hendriks H JM, Koes B W. et al .National practice guidelines for physical therapy in patients with low back pain. 29.03.06 www.cebp.nl/media/m31.pdf>
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Beurskens A JHM, Vet H CW, Köke A JA. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments.  Pain. 1996;  65 71-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bombardier de C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations.  Spine. 2000;  25 3100-3103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bullinger M, Morfeld M, Kohlmann T. et al . Der SF-36 in der rehabilitationswissenschaftlichen Forschung - Ergebnisse aus dem Norddeutschen Verbund für Rehabilitationsforschung (NVRF) im Förderschwerpunkt Rehabilitationswissenschaften.  Rehablitation (Stuttg). 2003;  42 218-225
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T. et al . Linking Health-Status Measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.  J Rehabil Med. 2002;  34 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cieza A, Ewert T h, Üstün Bedirhan T. et al . Development of ICF Core Sets for Patients with Chronic Conditions.  J Rehabil Med. 2004;  36 (Suppl 44) 9-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cieza A, Stucki G, Weigl M. et al . ICF Core Sets for Low Back Pain.  J Rehabil Med. 2004;  Suppl 44 69-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S. et al . ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned.  Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2005;  37 212-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cieza A, Stucki G. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): A Basis for Multidisciplinary Clinical Practice. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Clinical care in rheumatic diseases Atlanta; ACR in press 3rd ed
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Daltroy L H, Cats-Baril W L, Katz J N. et al . The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument. Reliability and Validity Tests.  Spine. 1996;  21 741-749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens A JHM. et al . Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain Research. A Proposal for Standardized Use.  Spine. 1998;  23 2000-2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Deyo R A, Weinstein J N. Low back pain.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 363-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dionne C E, Borbonnais R, Frémont P. et al . A clinical return-to work rule for patients with back pain.  CMAJ. 2005;  172 1559-1567
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ehrlich G E, Khaltaev N G. Low back pain initiative. Department of Noncommunicable Diesease Management. Geneva; World Health Organization 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Ehrlich G E. Back Pain.  The Journal of Rheumatology. 2003;  30 26-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ehrlich G E. Low Back Pain.  Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003;  81 671-676
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ewert T, Geyh S, Grill E. et al . Die Anwendung der ICF der Neurorehabilitation anhand des ICF-Modellblattes und der ICF Core Sets.  Neurol Rehabil. 2005;  11 179-188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Fairbank J C, Pynsent P B. The Oswestry Disability Index.  Spine. 2000;  25 2940-2952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Fritz J M, Piva S R. Physical impairment index: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with acute low back pain.  Spine. 2003;  28 1189-1194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Füßl M. Das biopsychosoziale Modell der ICF in der Manuellen Therapie.  Manuelle Therapie. 2003;  7 189-195
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Von Garnier K, Stamm T A, Ewert T. et al . Anwendung der Internationalen Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (ICF) in der Ergotherapie. Ein Fallbeispiel.  ergoscience. 2006;  1 1-7
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Guyatt G H, Sullivan M J, Thompson P J. et al . The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure.  Can Med Assoc J. 1985;  132 919-923
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hoogendoorn W E, Poppel M N, Bongers P M. et al . Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain.  Spine. 2000;  25 2114-2125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hunt S M, McEwen van J, McKenna S P. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists.  J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985;  35 185-188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hurwitz E L, Morgenstern H, Yu F. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of low-back pain and related disability with psychological distress among patients enrolled in the UCLA Low-Back Pain Study.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;  56 463-471
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jones T, Kumar S. Physical ergonomics in low-back pain prevention.  J Occup Rehabil. 2001;  11 309-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Tulder van M. et al . Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working-age adults: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.  Spine. 2001;  26 262-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kendall N AS, Linton S J, Main C J. Guide to assessing psychological yellow flags in acute low back pain: Risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. Wellington; Accident and Rehabilitation & Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Maetzel A, Li L. The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001.  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002;  16 23-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Main C J. The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ).  J Psychosom Res. 1983;  27 503-514
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mayer T G, Barnes D, Kishino N D. et al . Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation I. A standardized Protocol and Normative Database.  Spine. 1988;  13 993-997
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mayer T G, Barnes D, Nichols G. et al . Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation II. A comparison with Isokinetic Lifting in a disabled chronic low back pain industrial population.  Spine. 1988;  13 998-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Moldofsky H. Sleep and pain.  Sleep Med Rev. 2001;  5 385-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Nordin M, Welser S, Campello M A. et al . Self-care techniques for acute episodes of low back pain.  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002;  16 89-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Picavet H S, Schouten J S. Physical load in daily life and low back problems in the general population -The MORGEN study.  Prev Med. 2000;  31 506-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Pincus T, Burton A K, Vogel S. et al . A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain.  Spine. 2002;  27 E109-E120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.  Spine. 2000;  25 3115-3124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Schochat T, Rehberg W, Kempis von J. et al . The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument: Übersetzung und psychometrische Analyse der deutschen Version an einer Stichprobe von Rehabilitanden mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen.  Z Rheumatol. 2000;  9 303-313
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Schoppink L EM, Tulder M W, Koes B W. et al . Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.  Phys Ther. 1996;  76 268-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Steiner W A, Ryser van L, Huber E. et al . Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine.  Phys Ther. 2002;  82 1098-1107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Stucki G, Sangha O. Clinical quality management: putting the pieces together.  Arthritis Care Res. 1996;  9 405-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Stucki G, Sangha O. Principles of rehabilitation. Klippel JH, Dieppe PA Rheumatology London; Mosby 1997 2nd ed
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T. et al . Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice.  Disabil Rehabil. 2002;  24 281-282
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine.  Disabil Rehabil. 2002;  24 932-938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Stucki G, Sigl T. Assessment of the impact of disease on the individual.  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;  17 451-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 The Euroqol Group . Euroqol - a facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.  Health Policy. 1990;  16 199-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Verbunt J A, Seelen H A, Vlaeyen J W. et al . Disuse and deconditioning in chronic low back pain: concepts and hypotheses on contributing mechanisms.  Eur J Pain. 2003;  7 9-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Ware J E, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). A. Conceptual framework and item selection.  Medical Care. 1992;  30 473-483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Ware J E, Kosinski M, Keller S D. SF-12. How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Boston; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Wessely S, Hotopf M, Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue and its syndromes. Oxford; Oxford University Press 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 54 World Health Organization (WHO) .International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). Geneva; WHO 1992 10th Rev
    Google Scholar
  • 55 World Health Organization (WHO) .International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva; WHO 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 56 World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Report Series .The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. Geneva; WHO 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 57 World Health Organisziation (WHO) . Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (ICF).  09.03.06;  , www.dimdi.de/de/klassi/ICF/icf_dimdi_final_draft_1.pdf>
    Google Scholar

Michaela Kirschneck

Institut für Gesundheits- und Rehabilitationswissenschaften, ICF Research Branch of the WHO CC FIC (DMDI), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität

Marchioninistr. 15

81377München

Email: Michaela.Kirschneck@med.uni- muenchen.de

      >