Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963418
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Transarterielle Chemoperfusion des Beckens
Ergebnisse bei symptomatischen Rezidivtumoren und LymphknotenmetastasenTransarterial Chemoperfusion of the PelvisResults in Symptomatic Locally Recurrent Tumors and Lymph Node MetastasesPublication History
eingereicht: 19.12.2006
angenommen: 18.7.2007
Publication Date:
05 September 2007 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Zielsetzung: Evaluation der lokoregionären transarteriellen Chemoperfusion (TACP) bei therapierefraktären malignen Rezidivtumoren und Lymphknotenmetastasen im Becken anhand der klinischen Symptomatik, des lokalen Tumoransprechens und des Überlebens. Material und Methodik: Zwischen 2003 und 2005 wurden bei 24 Patienten (medianes Alter 56,5 Jahre, Bereich 33 - 82) 128 ambulante TACP (mind. 3, im Mittel 5 /Patient) in vierwöchigen Abständen durchgeführt. Mitomycin C (6 mg/m2) wurde in Kombination mit Gemcitabine (1500 mg/m2) über 60 min durch einen je nach Tumorlokalisation und -gefäßversorgung in der A. abdominalis oder A. iliaca interna platzierten Katheter verabreicht. Die Tumorgröße wurde mit CT oder MRT bestimmt. Das radiologische Ansprechen wurde nach dem RECIST-Standard (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) in „complete response” (CR), „partial response” (PR), „stable disease” (SD) und „progressive disease” (PD) eingeteilt. Eine deutliche Verbesserung klinischer Symptome wurde als „responseclinical”, eine Stabilisierung als „stable diseaseclinical” und eine Verschlechterung bzw. ein Auftreten neuer Symptome als „progressionclinical” bewertet. Ergebnisse: Alle Patienten tolerierten das ambulante Therapiemanagement gut und ohne relevante Komplikationen. Es wurde keine Grad-III/IV-Toxizität nach CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) beobachtet. Bei tumorassoziierten Schmerzen, Blutungen, eingeschränkter Beweglichkeit der unteren Extremitäten, Inkontinenz, Harnabflussstörungen und Obstipation wurde ein klinisches Gesamtansprechen von 54 % erreicht. Radiologisch zeigten 4 / 24 (17 %) Patienten eine PR, 12 / 24 (50 %) eine SD und 8 / 24 (33 %) eine PD. Das radiologische Ansprechen (medianes Überleben seit erster TACP) war wie folgt: kolorektales Karzinom: 2 PR, 7 SD, 2 PD (11,5 Monate), Ovarial-Ca: 1 SD, 2 PD (8,5 Mon), Zervix-Ca: 1 PR, 1 SD (6 Mon), Mamma-Ca: 2 SD (6 Mon), Magen-Ca: 1 PD (11 Mon), Nebennieren-Ca: 1 PD (12 Mon), Anal-Ca: 1 PD (10 Mon), Prostata-Ca: 1 PD (20 Mon), Gartner-Gang-Ca: 1 PR (20 Mon), Nierenzell-Ca: 1 SD (10 Mon). Schlussfolgerung: Da in 54 % lokale tumorassoziierte Beschwerden verbessert und in 67 % eine Kontrolle (PR + SD) des Tumorwachstums erzielt werden konnten, sollte die TACP in der palliativen onkologischen Betreuung bei Patienten mit Beckenrezidivtumoren als Option in Erwägung gezogen werden.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate local transarterial chemoperfusion (TACP) of therapy-resistant, locally recurrent malignant tumors and lymph node metastases in the pelvis with respect to clinical response, tumor response and survival. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2005, 24 outpatients (median age 56.5 years, range 33 - 82) were treated with 128 TACPs (min. 3; mean 5 sess/patient) in 4-week intervals. Depending on the tumor location and vascularization, a fluoroscopy catheter was placed either in the abdominal aorta or internal pelvic artery. A combination of mitomycin C (6 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1500 mg/m2) was administered over 60 minutes. The tumor size was measured using CT or MRI. The radiological response was classified according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) as “complete response” (CR), “partial response” (PR), “stable disease” (SD) and “progressive disease” (PD). The clinical response was classified as “responseclinical” if the symptoms improved distinctly, “stable diseaseclinical” if complaints were stabilized, and “progressionclinical” if symptoms deteriorated or new symptoms appeared. After the third TACP, patients were evaluated for clinical and radiological response. In the case of clinical and radiological progression, therapy was stopped and the patient was referred to the hospital’s tumor board. In the case of radiological response and clinical progression or clinical response and radiological progression, therapy was continued. Therapy could be stopped by the patient at any time. Results: Treatment was tolerated well by all patients. No clinically relevant problems and no grade III or IV toxicity according to CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) appeared. Tumor-related pain, bleeding, restricted mobility of the lower extremities, incontinence, urinary tract obstruction, and constipation were reduced in 9 / 17, 5 / 6, 3 / 3, 1 / 3, 2 / 5, and 1 / 3 of cases (clinical response rate: 54 %). Radiologically, 4 / 24 (17 %) patients showed PR, 12 / 24 (50 %) SD, and 8 / 24 (34 %) PD (tumor control (PR + SD): 67 % of cases). Tumor response (median survival since first TACP) was as follows: colorectal: 2 PR, 7 SD, 2 PD (11.5 months), ovarian: 1 SD, 2 PD (8.5 mon), cervical: 1 PR, 1 SD (6 mon), breast: 2 SD (6 mon), gastric: 1 PD (11 mon), adrenal gland: 1 PD (12 mon), anal: 1 PD (10 mon), prostate: 1 PD (20 mon), Gartner’s duct: 1 PR (20 mon), renal cell carcinoma: 1 SD (10 mon). Conclusion: Since tumor-related complaints were improved in 54 % of the cases and control of tumor growth (PR + SD) was achieved in 67 % of the cases, TACP for recurrent pelvic malignancies should be considered as a palliative oncological treatment option.
Key words
transarterial chemoperfusion - pelvis - clinical response - colorectal cancer
Literatur
- 1
Damjanovic D, Thompson P, Findlay M.
Evidence-based update of chemotherapy options for metastatic colorectal cancer.
ANZ J Surg.
2004;
74
781-787
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Nicum S, Midgley R, Kerr D J.
Colorectal Cancer.
Acta Oncologica.
2003;
42
263-275
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Poveda A.
Ovarian cancer: is the news good enough?.
Int J Gynecol Cancer.
2005;
15
298-306
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Colombo N, Parma G, Lapresa M T. et al .
Role of conservative surgery in ovarian cancer: the European experience.
Int J Gynecol Cancer.
2005;
15
206-211
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Vogl T J, Trapp M, Pegios W. et al .
Volumetrische und morphologische CT-Parameter zur Prognoseabschätzung und Therapiekontrolle
des Hepatozellulären Karzinoms unter arterieller Chemoembolisation.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
1997;
167
219-226
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Li X P, Meng Z Q, Guo W J. et al .
Treatment for liver metastases form breast cancer: results and prognostic factors.
World J Gastroenterol.
2005;
11
3782-3787
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Kemeny N, Eid A, Stockman J. et al .
Hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine and dexamethasone plus high-dose mitomycin
C for patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
J Surg Oncol.
2005;
91
97-101
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Kemeny N, Huang Y, Cohen A. et al .
Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from
colorectal cancer.
N Engl J Med.
1999;
341
2039-2048
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Vogl T J, Herzog C, Zangos S. et al .
Transpulmonale Chemoembolisation (TPCE) als palliatives Behandlungskonzept bei primären
Lungentumoren.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2007;
179
300-307
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Vogl T J, Heller M, Zangos S. et al .
Transarterielle Chemoperfusion des inoperablen Pankreaskarzinoms und Lokalrezidivs.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2003;
175
695-704
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Rohde S, Turowski B, Berkefeld J. et al .
Klinische und histopathologische Ergebnisse nach lokaler Chemoembolisation oraler
und oropharyngealer Karzinome - Vergleich mit intraarterieller Chemoperfusion.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2006;
178
979-978
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Kato T, Nemoto R, Mori H. et al .
Arterial chemoembolization with mitomycin C microcapsules in the treatment of primary
or secondary carcinoma of the kidney, liver, bone and intrapelvic organs.
Cancer.
1981;
48
674-680
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Tseng M H, Park H C.
Pelvic intra-arterial mitomycin C infusion in previously treated patients with metastatic,
unresectable, pelvic colorectal cancer and angiographic determination of tumor vascularity.
J Clin Oncol.
1985;
3
1093-1100
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Toschi L, Finocchiaro G, Bartolini S. et al .
Role of gemcitabine in cancer therapy.
Future Oncol.
2005;
1
7-17
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Burris H A, Moore M, Anderson J. et al .
Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy
for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial.
J Clin Oncol.
1997;
15
2403-2413
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E. et al .
New guidelines to evaluate response to treatment in solid tumors.
J Nat Cancer Inst.
2000;
92
205-216
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Chen H SG, Gross J F.
Intra-arterial infusion of anticancer drugs: theoretic aspects of drug delivery and
review of responses.
Cancer Treat Rep.
1980;
64
31-40
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Stephens F O.
Pharmacokinetics of intraarterial chemotherapy.
Recent Results Cancer Res.
1983;
86
1-12
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Dedrick R L.
Arterial drug infusion: pharmacokinetic problems and pitfalls.
J Nat Cancer Inst.
1988;
80
84-89
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Müller H, Hilger R.
Curative and palliative aspects of regional chemotherapy in combination with surgery.
Support Care Cancer.
2003;
11
1-10
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Strocchi E, Iaffaioli R V, Facchini G. et al .
Stop-flow technique for loco-regional delivery of high dose chemotherapy in the treatment
of advanced pelvic cancers.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
2004;
30
663-670
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Guadagni S, Fiorentini G, Palumbo G. et al .
Hypoxic pelvic perfusion with mitomycin C using a simplified balloon-occlusion technique
in the treatment of patients with unresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer.
Arch Surg.
2001;
136
105-112
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Unal A, Bayar S, Tez M.
Pelvic perfusion for locally recurrent unresectable rectal tumors.
Hepatogastroenterology.
2005;
52
757-760
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Ijken M G, Etten van B, Guetens G. et al .
Biochemotherapeutic strategies and the (dis)utility of hypoxic perfusion of liver,
abdomen and pelvis using balloon catheter technique.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
2005;
31
807-816
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Ikeda O, Mizukami N, Murata Y. et al .
Randomized comparison of intra-arterial chemotherapy versus intra-arterial chemotherapy
and gelfoam embolization for treatment of advanced cervical cancer.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.
2005;
28
736-734
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Nagata Y, Araki N, Kimura H. et al .
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy by transcatheter arterial infusion method for uterine cervical
cancer.
JVIR.
2000;
11
313-319
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Hasuo Y. et al .
Neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomie and/or radiotherapy
for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Gynecol Oncol.
1998;
69
130-136
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Jacobs van S C, Menashe D S, Mewissen M W. et al .
Intraarterial cisplatin infusion in the management of transitional cell carcinoma
of the bladder.
Cancer.
1989;
64
388-391
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Stewart D, Eapan L, Hirte W E. et al .
Intra-arterial cisplatin for bladder cancer.
J Urol.
1987;
138
302-305
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Wallace S S, Chuang V P, Samuels M. et al .
Transcatheter intra-arterial infusion of chemotherapy in advanced bladder cancer.
Cancer.
1984;
49
640-645
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Galetti T P, Pontes J E, Montie J. et al .
Neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced transitional
cell carcinoma of the bladder: results and follow-up.
J Urol.
1989;
142
1211-1215
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Textor H J, Wilhelm K, Strunk H. et al .
Lokoregionäre Chemoperfusion mit Mitoxantron zur palliativen Therapie blutender Blasenkarzinome
im Vergleich zur Chemoembolisation.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2000;
172
462-466
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Manivit P, Polo R, Tabary D. et al .
Initial locoregional chemotherapy in recurrent and locoregional advanced or inoperable
stages of pelvic uterine and anorectal cancers.
Bull Cancer.
1995;
82
137-148
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Görich J, Hasan I, Kunze V. et al .
Intraarterielle Behandlung von therapierefraktären Tumorrezidiven des Beckens.
Strahlenther Onkol.
1995;
171
671-678
MissingFormLabel
Prof. Thomas J. Vogl
Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, J. W. Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt
Theodor-Stern Kai 7
60596 Frankfurt
Phone: ++ 49/69/63 01 72 77
Fax: ++ 49/69/63 01 72 58
Email: T.vogl@em.uni-frankfurt.de